Literature DB >> 27464565

Health-Related Quality of Life and the Desire for Revision Surgery Among Children With Cleft Lip and Palate.

Kavitha Ranganathan1, Danielle Shapiro, Oluseyi Aliu, Christian J Vercler, Michaella Baker, Steven J Kasten, Seth A Warschausky, Steven R Buchman, Jennifer F Waljee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Children with cleft lip with or without palate (CLCP) require multiple reconstructive procedures, however, little is known about their desire for surgical revision. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the desire for revision.
METHODS: The authors surveyed children with CLCP (n = 71) and their caregivers regarding general and cleft-specific HRQOL and the desire for revision surgery. The authors used logistic regression models to evaluate the relationship between HRQOL and the desire for revision stratified by age, and determined the level of agreement between caregivers and children.
RESULTS: In this cohort, 54.9% of children desired revision, primarily of the nose (n = 23), lip (n = 20), and dentoalveolar structures (n = 19). Children 11 years or older were more likely to desire revision than younger children (OR 3.39, 95% CI [1.19, 9.67], P <0.05). Children who reported poorer HRQOL with respect to appearance (OR 2.31, 95% CI [1.25-4.29], P = 0.008), social development (OR 0.91, 95% CI [0.84-0.99], P = 0.02), and communication (OR 0.94, 95% CI [0.89-0.99], P = 0.02) were significantly more likely to desire revision than children who reported more positive HRQOL. Caregivers' and children's desires for revision were only modestly correlated (r = 0.41).
CONCLUSIONS: Children with CLCP who report poorer HRQOL are more likely to desire revision than children with higher HRQOL; these differences are further magnified among older children. Given the modest correlation between patient and caregiver goals for revision, it is important to evaluate both perspectives when considering revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27464565     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

1.  Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Karen Wy Wong Riff; Natasha M Longmire; Asteria Albert; Gregory C Allen; Mustafa Asim Aydin; Stephen B Baker; Stefan J Cano; Andrew J Chan; Douglas J Courtemanche; Marieke M Dreise; Jesse A Goldstein; Timothy E E Goodacre; Karen E Harman; Montserrat Munill; Aisling O Mahony; Mirta Palomares Aguilera; Petra Peterson; Andrea L Pusic; Rona Slator; Mia Stiernman; Elena Tsangaris; Sunil S Tholpady; Federico Vargas; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Revisional Techniques for Secondary Cleft Lip Deformities.

Authors:  Shayan M Sarrami; Anna J Skochdopole; Andrew M Ferry; Edward P Buchanan; Larry H Hollier; Robert F Dempsey
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  The Effect of Cleft Orthognathic and Nasal Reconstruction on Perceived Social Traits.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Posnick; Srinivas M Susarla; Brian E Kinard
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-31

4.  Decision-Making in Cleft-Related Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patients and Caregivers.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Annie K Patterson; Kylie Schafer; Madeleine Haase; Kavitha Ranganathan; Noelle Carlozzi; Christian J Vercler; Steven J Kasten; Steven R Buchman; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-08-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.