OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms is often challenging. Differentiating between pleomorphic adenomas (PA) and other basaloid neoplasms, especially basal cell adenoma (BCA) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), can be difficult in cellular aspirates. PLAG1 (PA gene 1) is a proto-oncogene, which is frequently rearranged in PAs, leading to the aberrant expression of its protein. PLAG1 IHC expression has been reported to be positive in most PAs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of PLAG1 to differentiate PA from other basaloid neoplasms. STUDY DESIGN: Immunohistochemical evaluation of PLAG1 was performed on 125 cases (52 FNAs and 73 surgical excisions). Nuclear staining of tumor cells was scored by the intensity and percentage of positive tumor cells. A combined score of >5 was defined as positive. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The sensitivity (55%) and specificity (75%) of PLAG1 in diagnosing PA in FNAs is relatively modest thus limiting its diagnostic utility. BCAs and AdCCs showed PLAG1 false positivity, in surgical excision specimens and less so in FNAs. This may be due to limited sampling or tumor heterogeneity. Hence, PLAG1 is a modest marker for PAs in FNAs.
OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms is often challenging. Differentiating between pleomorphic adenomas (PA) and other basaloid neoplasms, especially basal cell adenoma (BCA) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), can be difficult in cellular aspirates. PLAG1 (PA gene 1) is a proto-oncogene, which is frequently rearranged in PAs, leading to the aberrant expression of its protein. PLAG1 IHC expression has been reported to be positive in most PAs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of PLAG1 to differentiate PA from other basaloid neoplasms. STUDY DESIGN: Immunohistochemical evaluation of PLAG1 was performed on 125 cases (52 FNAs and 73 surgical excisions). Nuclear staining of tumor cells was scored by the intensity and percentage of positive tumor cells. A combined score of >5 was defined as positive. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The sensitivity (55%) and specificity (75%) of PLAG1 in diagnosing PA in FNAs is relatively modest thus limiting its diagnostic utility. BCAs and AdCCs showed PLAG1 false positivity, in surgical excision specimens and less so in FNAs. This may be due to limited sampling or tumor heterogeneity. Hence, PLAG1 is a modest marker for PAs in FNAs.
Authors: Nora Katabi; Bin Xu; Achim A Jungbluth; Lei Zhang; Sung Y Shao; Jason Lane; Ronald Ghossein; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Histopathology Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Adepitan A Owosho; Olufunlola M Adesina; Oluwole Odujoko; Hezekiah Akinyemi; Akinwumi Komolafe; Simon Tadros; Robert Bauer; Kurt F Summersgill Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2022-02-15