Literature DB >> 27462346

Design Space Toolbox V2: Automated Software Enabling a Novel Phenotype-Centric Modeling Strategy for Natural and Synthetic Biological Systems.

Jason G Lomnitz1, Michael A Savageau2.   

Abstract

Mathematical models of biochemical systems provide a means to elucidate the link between the genotype, environment, and phenotype. A subclass of mathematical models, known as mechanistic models, quantitatively describe the complex non-linear mechanisms that capture the intricate interactions between biochemical components. However, the study of mechanistic models is challenging because most are analytically intractable and involve large numbers of system parameters. Conventional methods to analyze them rely on local analyses about a nominal parameter set and they do not reveal the vast majority of potential phenotypes possible for a given system design. We have recently developed a new modeling approach that does not require estimated values for the parameters initially and inverts the typical steps of the conventional modeling strategy. Instead, this approach relies on architectural features of the model to identify the phenotypic repertoire and then predict values for the parameters that yield specific instances of the system that realize desired phenotypic characteristics. Here, we present a collection of software tools, the Design Space Toolbox V2 based on the System Design Space method, that automates (1) enumeration of the repertoire of model phenotypes, (2) prediction of values for the parameters for any model phenotype, and (3) analysis of model phenotypes through analytical and numerical methods. The result is an enabling technology that facilitates this radically new, phenotype-centric, modeling approach. We illustrate the power of these new tools by applying them to a synthetic gene circuit that can exhibit multi-stability. We then predict values for the system parameters such that the design exhibits 2, 3, and 4 stable steady states. In one example, inspection of the basins of attraction reveals that the circuit can count between three stable states by transient stimulation through one of two input channels: a positive channel that increases the count, and a negative channel that decreases the count. This example shows the power of these new automated methods to rapidly identify behaviors of interest and efficiently predict parameter values for their realization. These tools may be applied to understand complex natural circuitry and to aid in the rational design of synthetic circuits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  System Design Space; biochemical systems theory; code:python; gene regulatory circuits; synthetic biology

Year:  2016        PMID: 27462346      PMCID: PMC4940394          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


  31 in total

1.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T S Gardner; C R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Phenotypic deconstruction of gene circuitry.

Authors:  Jason G Lomnitz; Michael A Savageau
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.642

3.  DNA looping in cellular repression of transcription of the galactose operon.

Authors:  N Mandal; W Su; R Haber; S Adhya; H Echols
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Phenotypic repertoire of the FNR regulatory network in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Dean A Tolla; Michael A Savageau
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Regulatory design governing progression of population growth phases in bacteria.

Authors:  Agustino Martínez-Antonio; Jason G Lomnitz; Santiago Sandoval; Maximino Aldana; Michael A Savageau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Unrelated toxin-antitoxin systems cooperate to induce persistence.

Authors:  Rick A Fasani; Michael A Savageau
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Synthetic biology.

Authors:  Steven A Benner; A Michael Sismour
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Strategy revealing phenotypic differences among synthetic oscillator designs.

Authors:  Jason G Lomnitz; Michael A Savageau
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.110

9.  Elucidating the genotype-phenotype map by automatic enumeration and analysis of the phenotypic repertoire.

Authors:  Jason G Lomnitz; Michael A Savageau
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2015-09-28

10.  A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator.

Authors:  Jesse Stricker; Scott Cookson; Matthew R Bennett; William H Mather; Lev S Tsimring; Jeff Hasty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The best models of metabolism.

Authors:  Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2017-05-19

2.  HillTau: A fast, compact abstraction for model reduction in biochemical signaling networks.

Authors:  Upinder S Bhalla
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Rapid Discrimination Among Putative Mechanistic Models of Biochemical Systems.

Authors:  Jason G Lomnitz; Michael A Savageau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Clb3-centered regulations are recurrent across distinct parameter regions in minimal autonomous cell cycle oscillator designs.

Authors:  Thierry D G A Mondeel; Oleksandr Ivanov; Hans V Westerhoff; Wolfram Liebermeister; Matteo Barberis
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2020-04-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.