Effects of low-dose ketamine on succinylcholine-induced postoperative myalgia in outpatient surgeries: a randomized, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the many complications of succinylcholine, it is still widely used as a superior muscle relaxant for rapid sequence induction. One of these complications is postoperative myalgia (POM). The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic effect of low-dose ketamine on the incidence and severity of POM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind clinical study, a total of 148 patients scheduled for general anesthesia were randomly divided into two equal groups. Initially, in Group K, 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine was injected intravenously, whereas in Group N, the same volume (5 mL) of normal saline was injected. Thereafter, anesthesia was induced in all patients, by injecting 1.5 mg/kg of fentanyl and 2 mg/kg of propofol intravenously. Following the loss of eyelid reflex, 1.5 mg/kg of succinylcholine was injected intravenously as a muscle relaxant and then the patients were intubated. POM was defined as a pain with no surgical interferences, and its intensity was graded based on a four-point scale. The incidence and severity of myalgia were assessed by a blinded observer 24 hours after surgery.
RESULTS: In terms of demographic data, the results of this study showed that there is no significant difference between patients in both groups (P>0.05). Overall, the incidence of POM in Group K was significantly less, when compared with Group N (P<0.05), but both groups were comparable based on the grade 2 of POM. After the induction of anesthesia, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were found to reduce in both groups (P<0.05). However, the changes were somehow similar, and repeated measures of variance analysis showed no significant difference in the two study groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The addition of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine to propofol for the induction of anesthesia can be effective in reducing the incidence of low-grade POM.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes

Introduction

For >60 years, succinylcholine is still being administered as a selective relaxant for rapid sequence intubation by anesthesiologists in many countries.1 It has been shown to possess unique features such as low cost, fast-acting, short half-life, safe metabolites, and causing excellent muscle relaxation for intubation;2 however, it has many side effects as well. Postoperative myalgia (POM), with an incidence rate of ~41%–92%, is one of the most common side effects of this drug and can take several days to cause significant discomfort in patients.3 However, its effect is felt more in the throat, neck, shoulder, and abdominal muscles and is common among patients with outpatient surgery.4 Due to its unknown real context of pathogenesis and in an effort to reduce the incidence and severity of succinylcholine-induced myalgia, various medications including nondepolarizing muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines, magnesium sulfate, opioids, gabapentin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been tested, with varying degrees of success.5,6

Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with excellent analgesic activity, and at subanesthetic doses it is capable of preventing central sensitization, hyperalgesia, drug resistance creation, and reduction of postoperative pain.7 Although, ketamine administration could produce unpleasant psychogenic complications, no disagreeable effects have been recorded in patients who received a low dose of ketamine. The effects of ketamine on postelectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) myalgia have been studied earlier, and the results showed that ketamine could not prevent this type of myalgia.8

To the best of our knowledge, the effect of ketamine on the prevention of POM is yet to be determined. Therefore, in this randomized, double-blind study, the prophylactic effect of low-dose ketamine on the incidence and severity of myalgia caused by succinylcholine injection in patients undergoing outpatient surgery was investigated.

Materials and methods

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences and was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT2014062412789N5). A complete description of the study was also presented to each participant, and written informed consent was obtained. The sample size was calculated based on the assumption that the incidence of POM in outpatient cases is ~70%, and intervention that can cause 25% reduction in incidence of POM will be interesting. To consider this difference and type I error equal to 5% and 90% power of the study, 72 patients were required to be in each group (α=0.05 and β=90%), but in order to avoid possible loss of samples during the study, the number of patients in each group was increased to 74. Thus, 148 patients, who were scheduled for outpatient surgery under general anesthesia, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II within the age of 18–70 years, were included in this double-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients with a history of allergy to medications; substance abuse; malignant hyperthermia; myopathy; cardiovascular, liver, and advanced kidney diseases; and the risk of difficult intubation based on physical examination were excluded from the study.

Before surgery, patients were evaluated by the anesthesiologists. The study protocol and evaluation of myalgia based on Kararmaz’s criteria were described to the patients.4 Based on a computer-generated random sequence, the 148 patients were enrolled into one of the two groups (ketamine or saline). The patients did not receive premedication.

In the operating room, standard monitoring of the noninvasive blood pressure, electrocardiogram, heart rate, and pulse oximetry was done, and the preliminary values were recorded. Thereafter, a venous cannula (G=18) was placed on the dorsum of a patient’s hand. Before the induction of anesthesia in patients of Group K, 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine (a 5 mL volume was reached by adding distilled water) was injected intravenously and 5 mL of normal saline was injected intravenously slowly into patients in Group N. Drugs were prepared in 5 mL syringes by an anesthesia nurse who was unaware of the grouping. After injecting the study drugs, 1.5 mg/kg of fentanyl was injected intravenously within 60 seconds and subsequently 2 mg/kg of propofol was administered intravenously within 30 seconds for the induction of anesthesia. Following the loss of eyelid reflex, 1.5 mg/kg of succinylcholine was injected intravenously and patients were ventilated using bag and mask and with 100% oxygen. After fasciculation, the values of heart rate and blood pressure were measured and recorded, and tracheal intubation was performed. The maintenance of anesthesia continued using a mixture of oxygen, N2O (40/60), and isoflurane 1 MAC. After 5 minutes of tracheal intubation, the values of heart rate and blood pressure were obtained and recorded again. For maintenance of muscle relaxation, 0.2 mg/kg of atracurium was used as suggested by the surgeon. At the end of the surgery, muscle relaxation was reversed using neostigmine and atropine. After the desired spontaneous ventilation, the patients were extubated. The patients were transferred to the recovery room and complications, if any, were recorded during recovery. After meeting the discharge criteria, the patients were discharged to be taken home and cared for by a responsible adult. The incidence and severity of myalgia in the patients were determined 24 hours after surgery by a medical student who was unaware of the grouping. Myalgia is defined as “a pain with no surgical interference” and is graded based on Kararmaz et al’s4 four-point scale as follows: 0= no muscle pain, 1= muscle stiffness limited to one area of the body, 2= muscle pain or stiffness noticed spontaneously by a patient who requires analgesics, and 3= incapacitating generalized, severe muscle stiffness or pain.

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 12.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). The comparison profile of the patients was performed using the analysis of variance test. The incidence and severity of myalgia were compared using the chi-square and independent t-tests. The value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In this study, a total of 207 patients were scheduled for outpatient surgery from July 2013 to August 2014. Of them, 29 patients could not meet the entry criteria. Twenty-seven patients had no willingness to participate in the study, and the surgery of three patients was canceled. The remaining 148 patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Two patients in Group N due to nausea, vomiting, and pain and one patient in Group K due to arrhythmia were turned from outpatient to inpatient. Two persons from Group K did not cooperate with the evaluation of POM. The data associated with the 72 patients in Group N and 71 patients in Group K were analyzed (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Flow diagram.

There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex, and duration of surgery between both groups (Table 1). In Group K, 13 (18.1%) out of the 71 patients had myalgia, whereas 36 (50%) out of the 72 patients had myalgia in Group N (P=0.001). Grade 1 POM was lower in Group K when compared with Group N (nine in Group K versus 33 in Group N; P<0.001), whereas the incidence of grade 2 POM was comparable among patients of the two groups (Table 2). The baseline values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate in both groups were similar. After the induction of anesthesia, the values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in both groups (P<0.05). However, these changes were somehow similar in the two groups, and repeated measures of variance analysis showed no significant difference in both groups (P>0.05). Changes in heart rate after induction and intubation between the two groups were compared and repeated measures of variance analysis showed no significant difference in the two groups (P>0.05; Table 3).

Table 1

Patients’ demographic data and duration of surgery for the normal saline (5 mL of saline IV) and ketamine (0.5 mg/kg of ketamine IV) groups

	Ketamine, n=71	Saline, n=72	P-value
Age, years	39.2±2.6	41.4±2.5	0.9
Sex (male/female)	39/33	41/31	0.9
Weight, kg	69.8±3.8	71.8±3.2	0.6
Duration of surgery	27.5±26	31±18	0.7
Type of surgery ENT/breast/abdomen/upper extremity	14/9/36/12	11/13/38/10	0.9

Note: Data are presented either as n or mean ± standard deviation.

Abbreviations: IV, intravenously; ENT, ear–nose–throat.

Table 2

Incidence and grade of myalgia in the normal saline (5 mL of saline IV) and ketamine (0.5 mg/kg of ketamine IV) groups

	Ketamine, n=71	Saline, n=72	P-value
Incidence, number (%)	13 (18.1)	36 (50)	0.001
Grade
0	59 (81.9)	36 (50)	0.001
1	9 (12.5)	33 (45.8)	0.001
2	4 (5.6)	3 (4.2)	0.9
3	0	0

Abbreviation: IV, intravenously.

Table 3

Cardiovascular parameters in the normal saline (5 mL of saline IV) and ketamine (0.5 mg/kg of ketamine IV) groups

	Ketamine, n=71	Saline, n=72	P-value
Systolic blood pressure
Base	139±20	132±10	0.55
After anesthesia induction	118±13	111±14	0.04
5 minutes after intubation	117±15	115±23	0.55
Diastolic blood pressure
Base	81±12	82±13	0.51
After anesthesia induction	73±11	68±12	0.01
5 minutes after intubation	72±12	71±13	0.51
Heart rate
Base	89±15	88±17	0.57
After anesthesia induction	82±20	78±15	0.04
5 minutes after intubation	81±20	88±15	0.06

Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Abbreviation: IV, intravenously.

Discussion

The results of this study showed that ketamine significantly reduced the incidence of succinylcholine-induced myalgia.

Succinylcholine is a muscle relaxant that is commonly used due to deep neuromuscular blocks for intubation in patients undergoing ambulatory anesthesia, but associated myalgia has been shown to occur in 41%–92% of patients.9,10 Since ambulation increases the possibility of myalgia and its intensity, ambulatory patients are suitable for investigating this complication. Therefore, this group of patients was chosen for the study. Myalgia is most prevalent following the use of succinylcholine in the first day of surgery.11 As shown in a study, 92% of patients reported myalgia in the first 24 hours of study and the incidence of myalgia did not differ at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery.8 In this study, myalgia was evaluated only in the first 24 hours after surgery.

It seems that the intrafusal contraction of muscle fibers caused damage to spindles and subsequently myalgia.12 In vitro studies have shown that active, excessive, and continuous muscle contractions increase the uptake of calcium, activation of phospholipase A2, arachidonic acid, and prostaglandins production, thereby increasing the risk of muscle damage and pain.13 The results of this study showed that 50% of the patients in Group N experienced myalgia after anesthesia was induced with propofol. In a meta-analysis, the average incidence of myalgia in the first 24 hours with thiopental was 49.2% and with propofol was 65.4%.14 The incidence of myalgia in the present study was slightly lower when compared with the aforementioned meta-analysis. It appears that participants in this study belonged to low-level POM in general.

Ketamine creates a complex combination of both antinociceptive and pronociceptive actions. In fact, based on the mechanisms of analgesia with a direct receptor, the analgesic effect of ketamine is associated with the plasma levels of drugs and pain reduces with subanesthetic doses of ketamine.15,16 In general, it seems that the NMDA receptor plays an important role in the pathophysiology of pain, and the Supra spinal block of the NR2B NMDA subunit by ketamine has an important antinociceptive effect.17 Recent studies have shown the role of NMDA receptors in facilitating the process of pain in the central nervous system, this receptor is also responsible for central sensitization and windup phenomenon. The administration of NMDA receptor antagonists prevents the development of sensitization, hyperalgesia, and drug resistance.18 Ketamine is an antagonist of this receptor and has excellent analgesic activity at doses under anesthesia.19 It strengthens the performance of mu and kappa opioid receptors and also has direct effects on the delta opioid receptor. As such, ketamine certainly modulates the response of opioid receptors and reduces tolerance to opioids.20 It also strengthens the endogenesis of antinociceptive systems, in part, by its aminergic (serotonergic and noradrenergic) activation and inhibition of reuptake.21 It inhibits the synthesis of nitric oxide, which probably contributed to the analgesic effect.22 Also, there is evidence suggesting that ketamine interferes with nicotinic, muscarinic, and monoaminergic receptors.

As a result of the undesirable and unwanted side effects, ketamine usage is controversial in nonanesthetized patients, but when surgery is done under general anesthesia, these side effects are barely seen.19 In this study, surgery was performed under general anesthesia and none of the patients experienced delirium and nightmare. In our previous study,8 the effect of prophylactic ketamine on myalgia after ECT in 50 patients with major depression was demonstrated, in which 1 mg/kg of propofol and 0.3 mg/kg of ketamine were used for the induction of anesthesia, and muscle relaxation was induced using 0.5 mg/kg of succinylcholine. The results showed that the addition of ketamine to propofol had no effect on the incidence of myalgia after ECT, and only 12% of the patients had myalgia within 24 hours after ECT. However, our previous study8 is different in some aspects from the present study. In our previous study, ECT patients were investigated and the cause of myalgia was found to be different in surgical patients. Second, unlike the surgery, myalgia intensity in ECT is not related to fasciculation and motor activities.23 Third, the dose of anesthetic drugs for the induction of anesthesia and muscle relaxation was less than that of the present study. The result of our previous study, which was carried out on patients undergoing ECT, is not in line with the present study.

Cardiovascular changes were similar after the induction of anesthesia in both groups. In theory, hemodynamic stability can be predicted based on the induction of anesthesia with propofol and ketamine, when compared with propofol alone. This is because ketamine increases blood pressure and heart rate; therefore, the addition of this drug to propofol during anesthesia induction can inhibit the reduction of these parameters before the stimulation of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Also, following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, the synergistic effect of these two drugs can increase the depth of anesthesia and result in smoother cardiovascular response to airway stimulation. It appears that 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine could not produce such an impact on the hemodynamic system, thereby resulting in a significant effect.

Study limitations

One of the limitations of this study is the insufficient time for myalgia evaluation (24 hours). Failure to assess the incidence and severity of fasciculation is another limitation of this study. In this study, ketamine was diluted with sterile water, although this is not a wrong practice, but further addition of water, as carried out in this study, could produce ketamine with concentration below the physiological osmotic pressure, which may interfere with the effects of ketamine.

Conclusion

The addition of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine to propofol for the induction of anesthesia can be effective in reducing the incidence of POM, without any change in hemodynamic indices.