Literature DB >> 27461798

In vitro activity of Ceftaroline against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue and respiratory tract infections in African and Middle Eastern countries: AWARE global surveillance program 2012-2014.

James A Karlowsky1, Douglas J Biedenbach2, Samuel K Bouchillon1, Meredith Hackel1, Joseph P Iaconis3, Daniel F Sahm1.   

Abstract

The objective of this report was to document antimicrobial susceptibility testing surveillance data for ceftaroline and comparative agents from the AWARE (Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation) global surveillance program for bacterial pathogens causing skin and soft tissue and respiratory tract infections in African and Middle Eastern countries from 2012 through 2014. Pathogen identities were confirmed by MALDI-TOF and antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central laboratory. All methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (n= 923; MIC90, 0.25 μg/mL) and 91.8% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n= 1161; MIC90, 1 μg/mL) tested were susceptible to ceftaroline. The maximum ceftaroline MIC observed for isolates of MRSA was 2 μg/mL. All Streptococcus pyogenes (n= 174; MIC90, 0.008 μg/mL), Streptococcus agalactiae (n= 44; MIC90, 0.015 μg/mL), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n= 351; MIC90, 0.25 μg/mL), and Haemophilus influenzae (n= 84; MIC90, ≤0.015 μg/mL) were susceptible to ceftaroline. Rates of susceptibility to ceftaroline among ESBL-negative Escherichia coli (n= 338), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n= 241), and Klebsiella oxytoca (n= 97) were 89.1% (MIC90, 1 μg/mL), 94.2% (MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL), and 99.0% (MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL), respectively.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AWARE; Africa; Ceftaroline; MRSA; Middle East; Surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27461798     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of Potential β-Lactam Surrogates To Predict In Vitro Susceptibility and Resistance to Ceftaroline for Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Meredith A Hackel; Joseph P Iaconis; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Shao-Huan Lan; Shen-Peng Chang; Chih-Cheng Lai; Li-Chin Lu; Chien-Ming Chao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  In vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime-avibactam, and comparators against Gram-positive and -negative organisms in China: the 2018 results from the ATLAS program.

Authors:  Peiyao Jia; Ying Zhu; Hui Zhang; Bin Cheng; Ping Guo; Yingchun Xu; Qiwen Yang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.465

4.  Global trends of antimicrobial susceptibility to ceftaroline and ceftazidime-avibactam: a surveillance study from the ATLAS program (2012-2016).

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Yingchun Xu; Peiyao Jia; Ying Zhu; Ge Zhang; Jingjia Zhang; Simeng Duan; Wei Kang; Tong Wang; Ran Jing; Jingwei Cheng; Yali Liu; Qiwen Yang
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.887

5.  The use of extrapolation based on modeling and simulation to support high-dose regimens of ceftaroline fosamil in pediatric patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.

Authors:  Phylinda L S Chan; Lynn McFadyen; Andrea Quaye; Heidi Leister-Tebbe; Victoria M Hendrick; Jennifer Hammond; Susan Raber
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.