Literature DB >> 27461518

Chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, and micronuclei in lymphocytes of oncology department personnel handling anti-neoplastic drugs.

Majid Mahmoodi1, Saeed Soleyman-Jahi1, Kazem Zendehdel1, Hossein Mozdarani2, Cyrus Azimi1, Farideh Farzanfar1, Zahra Safari3, Mohammad-Ali Mohagheghi1, Malihea Khaleghian1, Kouros Divsalar4, Esfandiar Asgari1, Nima Rezaei5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Concern exists regarding the possible hazards to the personnel handling anti-neoplastic drugs. The purpose of the present study was to assess the genotoxicity induced by anti-neoplastic agents in oncology department personnel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To do this, the frequency of chromosomal aberrations (CAs) induced in peripheral blood lymphocytes was assessed at G0 phase of the cell cycle using metaphase analysis, cytokinesis block-micronucleus (MN) assay and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assay. These cytogenetic end points were measured among 71 nurses in oncology department and 10 drugstore personnel handling and preparing anti-neoplastic drugs. The results were compared to those of 74 matched nurses for age and sex not exposed to any anti-neoplastic agents.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the age of study subjects and control group (p > 0.05). The results showed that the mean frequency of cytogenetic damages in terms of CAs [chromatid breaks (p = 0.01), chromosome breaks (p = 0.005), total CAs (p = 0.001)], MN formation (p = 0.001), and SCE (p = 0.004) in lymphocytes of personnel handling anti-neoplastic drugs were significantly higher than those in control unexposed group.
CONCLUSION: Results of the present study demonstrate the cytogenetic damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of oncology department personnel. Suitable training and proper knowledge when handling anti-neoplastic drugs are emphasized to avoid potential health hazards caused by cytostatic agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-neoplastic agents; chromosomal aberrations; micronucleus; oncology department personnel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27461518     DOI: 10.1080/01480545.2016.1209678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0148-0545            Impact factor:   3.356


  5 in total

1.  Ameliorative effect of metformin on methotrexate-induced genotoxicity: An in vitro study in human cultured lymphocytes.

Authors:  Abeer M Rababa'H; Karem H Alzoubi; Omar F Khabour; Mera Ababneh
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Prognostic Significance of Preoperative and Postoperative Plasma Levels of Ghrelin in Gastric Cancer: 3-Year Survival Study.

Authors:  Saeed Soleyman-Jahi; Afshin Abdirad; Amir Afraz Fallah; Sevil Ghasemi; Fatemeh Sadeghi; Reza Heidari; Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh; Kazem Zendehdel
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 3.  Attribution of Ghrelin to Cancer; Attempts to Unravel an Apparent Controversy.

Authors:  Saeed Soleyman-Jahi; Fatemeh Sadeghi; Amin Pastaki Khoshbin; Leila Khani; Venus Roosta; Kazem Zendehdel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Closed-system drug-transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Lawrence Mj Best; Cynthia Tanguay; Elaine Lennan; Mika Korva; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-27

5.  Analysis of apoptosis related genes in nurses exposed to anti-neoplastic drugs.

Authors:  Maral Ramazani; Razieh Pourahmad Jaktaji; Farshad H Shirazi; Maria Tavakoli-Ardakani; Ahmad Salimi; Jalal Pourahmad
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.483

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.