| Literature DB >> 27461517 |
Alvin Chao-Yu Chen1, Chun-Ying Cheng2, Ying-Chao Chou2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic deformity of the distal radius may lead to multiple sequelae and severe functional impairment. Intramedullary fixation is a novel technique for treatment of distal radius fractures. The present study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary nailing for correction of post-traumatic deformity in late-diagnosed fractures of the distal radius.Entities:
Keywords: Distal radius; Extra-articular fracture; Intramedullary fixation; Malunion
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27461517 PMCID: PMC5310999 DOI: 10.1007/s10195-016-0422-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Traumatol ISSN: 1590-9921
Patient demographic data
| Patient no. | Age (years) | Sex | Wrist | AO fracture classification | Time to surgery (weeks) | Bone union (weeks) | Follow-up (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 | F | Left | A2 | 4 | 12 | 32 |
| 2 | 64 | M | Left | A2 | 16 | 6 | 28 |
| 3 | 69 | F | Left | A3 | 8 | 8 | 30 |
| 4 | 81 | M | Left | A2 | 6 | 6 | 24 |
| 5 | 58 | F | Left | A2 | 10 | 8 | 32 |
| 6 | 59 | F | Left | A2 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 7 | 49 | M | Right | A3 | 16 | 6 | 20 |
| 8 | 58 | F | Left | A2 | 9 | 6 | 18 |
| 9 | 71 | F | Left | A3 | 7 | 8 | 16 |
| 10 | 67 | M | Left | A3 | 4 | 6 | 16 |
| 11 | 49 | F | Left | A2 | 13 | 7 | 12 |
| 12 | 55 | F | Right | A2 | 18 | 6 | 16 |
| 13 | 62 | F | Right | A3 | 10 | 7 | 18 |
| 14 | 57 | M | Right | A2 | 14 | 6 | 14 |
| 15 | 66 | F | Left | A2 | 18 | 12 | 18 |
| 16 | 59 | F | Right | A3 | 11 | 12 | 18 |
| Mean | 61.8 | 10.7 | 7.6 | 20.3 | |||
| SD | 8.2 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 6.8 |
SD standard deviation
Fig. 1A 69-year-old female patient. Radiographs of left wrist at 6 weeks after injury show fracture of the distal radius with malalignment
Fig. 2Intra-operative C-arm images show correction of deformity through mini-open osteotomy and provisional Kirschner wire fixation (hollow arrow), and intramedullary preparation by broach taping
Fig. 3Radiographs at 6 months after surgery show osseous union and consolidation of osteotomy site (white arrow)
Statistical summary of functional outcomes
| Grip strength (kg), mean (SD) | Range of motion (°) | Pain VAS | Functional outcome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extension, mean (SD) | Flexion, mean (SD) | Supination, mean (SD) | Pronation, mean (SD) | Mayo, mean (SD) | |||
| Preoperative | 10.8 (2.9) | 35.6 (13.4) | 39.7 (9.7) | 22.2 (6.6) | 73.1 (8.1) | 1.2 (0.7) | 41.9 (14.6) |
| Postoperativea | 22.6 (6.2) | 71.3 (12.4) | 62.6 (12.6) | 76.6 (10.1) | 81.9 (9.5) | 0.3 (0.4) | 83.8 (10.9) |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
SD standard deviation, VAS visual analogue scale
aAt 1-year follow-up
Statistical summary of radiographic findings
| Radial height (mm) | Radial inclination (°) | Volar tilt (°) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | Postop | 1-year | Preop | Postop | One year | Preop | Postop | 1-year | |
| Mean | 8.0 | 12.1 | 11.2 | 16.4 | 21.9 | 21.1 | 4.0 | 11.2 | 4.8 |
| SD | 2.6 | 3.4 | 10.4 | 5.7 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 3.9 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.079 | 0.001 | 0.200 | <0.001 | 0.424 | |||
Preop preoperative, Postop postoperative
a p value, comparison between preop and postop status, and between postop and 1-year status