| Literature DB >> 27461373 |
Yuehui Zhang1,2, Xue Sun1, Xiaoyan Sun1, Fanci Meng1, Min Hu2, Xin Li2,3,4, Wei Li1, Xiao-Ke Wu1, Mats Brännström5, Ruijin Shao2, Håkan Billig2.
Abstract
Peripheral insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism are the primary features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, how insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism affect uterine function and contribute to the pathogenesis of PCOS are open questions. We treated rats with insulin alone or in combination with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and showed that peripheral insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism alter uterine morphology, cell phenotype, and cell function, especially in glandular epithelial cells. These defects are associated with an aberration in the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway that is used as an indicator for the onset of insulin resistance in classical metabolic tissues. Concomitantly, increased GSK3β (Ser-9) phosphorylation and decreased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in rats treated with insulin and hCG were also observed. We also profiled the expression of glucose transporter (Glut) isoform genes in the uterus under conditions of insulin resistance and/or hyperandrogenism. Finally, we determined the expression pattern of glycolytic enzymes and intermediates during insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism in the uterus. These findings suggest that the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways play a role in the onset of uterine insulin resistance, and they also suggest that changes in specific Glut isoform expression and alterations to glycolytic metabolism contribute to the endometrial dysfunction observed in PCOS patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27461373 PMCID: PMC4962087 DOI: 10.1038/srep30679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effects of hCG and/or insulin on the body weight and the weight of reproductive tissues.
| Control#(n = 10) | Insulin#(n = 10) | hCG (n = 10) | Insulin+hCG (n = 10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (kg) | 0.248 ± 0.004 | 0.259 ± 0.005 | 0.273 ± 0.005a | 0.304 ± 0.004a,c,e |
| Ovaries (g) | 0.095 ± 0.003 | 0.086 ± 0.005 | 0.232 ± 0.026a,c | 0.296 ± 0.019a,c,f |
| Ovaries/BW (g/kg) | 0.383 ± 0.015 | 0.322 ± 0.018 | 0.796 ± 0.120a,c | 0.961 ± 0.061a,c |
| Uteri (g) | 0.353 ± 0.011 | 0.388 ± 0.023 | 0.468 ± 0.033a | 0.476 ± 0.013a,d |
| Uteri/BW (g/kg) | 1.424 ± 0.047 | 1.454 ± 0.081 | 1.801 ± 0.134b,d | 1.555 ± 0.060 |
| n (%)† with normal estrous cycle | 10 (100) | 10 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Results are presented as means ± SEM. BW, body weight; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; #, the diestrus stage; †, Percentages shown are calculated out of the total number of animals.
ap < 0.01 versus control group.
bp < 0.05 versus control group.
cp < 0.01 versus insulin group.
dp < 0.05 versus insulin group.
ep < 0.01 versus hCG group.
fp < 0.05 versus hCG group.
Metabolic characteristics of rats treated with and without hCG and/or insulin.
| Control#(n = 10) | Insulin#(n = 10) | hCG(n = 10) | Insulin + hCG (n = 10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gonadotropins | ||||
| FSH (ng/ml) | 3.87 ± 0.03 | 3.86 ± 0.03 | 3.64 ± 0.02a,c | 3.70 ± 0.03e |
| LH (ng/ml) | 3.73 ± 0.15 | 3.74 ± 0.18 | 3.95 ± 0.14 | 4.27 ± 0.03b |
| LH/FSH | 0.97 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.05 | 1.08 ± 0.03 | 1.13 ± 0.01b,d |
| Steroid hormones | ||||
| E2 (ng/ml) | 1.55 ± 0.02 | 1.66 ± 0.05 | 1.66 ± 0.04 | 1.81 ± 0.06a |
| P4 (ng/ml) | 3.75 ± 0.04 | 3.80 ± 0.03 | 3.87 ± 0.04 | 3.86 ± 0.04 |
| Total T (ng/ml) | 2.92 ± 0.03 | 2.98 ± 0.04 | 2.98 ± 0.05 | 3.15 ± 0.04a,d,f |
| A4 (ng/ml) | 2.01 ± 0.01 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 2.02 ± 0.02 | 2.05 ± 0.01 |
| E2/Total T | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.01 |
| Total T/A4 | 1.45 ± 0.01 | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 1.48 ± 0.03 | 1.53 ± 0.02 |
| SHBG (ng/ml) | 3.14 ± 0.02 | 3.13 ± 0.01 | 3.14 ± 0.02 | 3.11 ± 0.01 |
| FAI | 93.21 ± 1.32 | 95.35 ± 1.43 | 95.15 ± 1.71 | 101.24 ± 1.31a,d,f |
| Lipid profile | ||||
| TC (mmol/l) | 1.28 ± 0.08 | 1.50 ± 0.14 | 1.78 ± 0.15b | 1.24 ± 0.12f |
| TG (mmol/l) | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.07b,d |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.93 ± 0.11 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 0.62 ± 0.05 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
| HDL-C/LDL-C | 3.27 ± 0.47 | 2.65 ± 0.34 | 2.83 ± 0.44 | 2.72 ± 0.27 |
Results are presented as means ± SEM. FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, 17β-estradiol; P4, progesterone; T, testosterone; A4, androstenedione; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin; FAI, free androgen index = [T (pg/ml) × 100]/SHBG (pg/ml); TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. #, the diestrus stage.
ap < 0.01 versus control group.
bp < 0.05 versus control group.
cp < 0.01 versus insulin group.
dp < 0.05 versus insulin group.
ep < 0.01 versus hCG group.
fp < 0.05 versus hCG group.
Figure 1Effects of insulin and/or hCG on glucose tolerance in rats.
(A) Fasting blood glucose. **p < 0.01 versus the insulin+hCG group. (B) Fasting blood insulin. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus the control group. (C) Changes in blood glucose concentrations during OGTT in the control, insulin, hCG, and insulin+hCG groups. #p < 0.05 (the insulin group versus the control group), *p < 0.05 (the insulin+hCG group versus the control group), determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing control to different treatment. (D) Area under the curve (AUC) for glucose. AUC was calculated by the formula [0.5 × (BG0 + BG30)/2 + 0.5 × (BG30 + BG60)/2 + 0.5 × (BG60 + BG120)/2 + 0.5 × (BG120 + BG180)/2] where the BG terms are the blood glucose levels at 0 min, 30 min, etc. *p < 0.01 versus the hCG group; **p < 0.01 versus the control group. Values are expressed as means ± SEM.
Figure 2Structure of the insulin and/or hCG-treated uterus.
All representative photomicrographs are of cross sections of the uterine middle zone. Uterine tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The investigators were blinded to allocation for histological analyses (n = 10/group). Lu, lumen; Le, luminal epithelial cells; Ge, glandular epithelial cells; Str, stromal cells; Myo, myometrium. Scale bars are indicated in the photomicrographs.
Figure 3Immunofluorescence detection of cytokeratin 8 and vimentin in rats treated with insulin and/or hCG.
Representative images are shown. The investigators were blinded to allocation for immunofluorescence analyses (n = 10/group). Lu, lumen; Le, luminal epithelial cells; Ge, glandular epithelial cells; Str, stromal cells. Scale bars are indicated in the photomicrographs.
Figure 4Effects of insulin and/or hCG on the insulin-mediated PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in the rat uterus.
Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 5Effects of insulin and/or hCG on the GSK3 phosphorylation and insulin-mediated MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in the rat uterus.
Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 6The effects of insulin and/or hCG on Glut isoform gene expression in the rat uterus.
Values are means ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 7Effects of insulin and/or hCG on glycolysis-related protein expression in the rat uterus.
Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.