Literature DB >> 27460767

Prognostic value of T1-mapping in TAVR patients: extra-cellular volume as a possible predictor for peri- and post-TAVR adverse events.

Jonathan Nadjiri1, Hanna Nieberler1, Eva Hendrich1, Albrecht Will1, Costanza Pellegrini2, Oliver Husser2, Christian Hengstenberg2, Andreas Greiser3, Stefan Martinoff1, Martin Hadamitzky4.   

Abstract

The benefit of a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can differ in patients, and therapy bears severe risks. High-degree aortic stenosis can lead to cardiac damage such as diffuse myocardial fibrosis, evaluable by extra-cellular volume (ECV) in CMR. Therefore, fibrosis might be a possible risk factor for unfavorable outcome after TAVR. We sought to assess the prognostic value of T1-mapping and ECV to predict adverse events during and after TAVR. The study population consisted of patients undergoing clinically indicated TAVR by performing additional CMR with native and contrast-enhanced T1-mapping sequences for additional evaluation of ECV. Study endpoints were congestive heart failure (CHF) and TAVR-associated conduction abnormalities defined as new onset of left bundle branch block (LBBB), AV-Block or implantation of a pacemaker. 94 patients were examined and followed. Median follow up time was 187 days (IQR 79-357 days). ECV was increased (>30 %) in 38 patients (40 %). There was no significant correlation between ECV and death, Hazard ratio (HR) 0.847 (95 % CI 0.335; 2.14), p = 0.72. ECV in patients with subsequent CHF was higher than in those without an event (33.5 ± 4.6 and 29.1 ± 4.1 %, respectively), but the difference just did not reach the level of significance HR 2.16 (95 % CI 0.969; 4.84), p = 0.06. Patients with post-TAVR conduction abnormality (LBBB, AV-block or pacemaker implantation) had statistically relevant lower ECV values compared to those without an event. Patients with an event had a mean ECV of 28.1 ± 3.16 %; patients without an event had a mean ECV of 29.8 ± 4.53, HR 0.56 (95 % CI 0.32; 0.96), p = 0.036. In this study, elevated myocardial ECV is a predictor of CHF by trend; CMR may be helpful in identifying patients with a high risk for post-TAVR cardiac decompensation benefitting from an intensified post-interventional surveillance. Patients with post-TAVR conductions abnormalities have a significantly decreased ECV. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which precise molecular tissue alteration is the protective factor or risk factor in this case.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conduction abnormalities; Extra cellular volume; Outcome after TAVR; Predictive value; T1-mapping

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27460767     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0948-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

1.  Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology.

Authors:  Martin Ugander; Abiola J Oki; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Andreas Greiser; Anthony H Aletras; Christopher T Sibley; Marcus Y Chen; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Advanced MR imaging techniques for evaluation of the heart and great vessels.

Authors:  J L Boxerman; T J Mosher; E R McVeigh; E Atalar; J A Lima; D A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Predictors for new-onset complete heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Sabine Bleiziffer; Hendrik Ruge; Jürgen Hörer; Andrea Hutter; Sarah Geisbüsch; Gernot Brockmann; Domenico Mazzitelli; Robert Bauernschmitt; Rüdiger Lange
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Changes in the QRS complex after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  F Follath; W R Ginks
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1972-06

5.  Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis in adults assessed by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  C M Otto; A S Pearlman; C L Gardner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Electrocardiographic and imaging predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ralf Koos; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Omer Aktug; Guido Dohmen; Rüdiger Autschbach; Nikolaus Marx; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2011-01

7.  Long-term outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Michelle J Keyes; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan; Thomas J Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Left bundle-branch block induced by transcatheter aortic valve implantation increases risk of death.

Authors:  Patrick Houthuizen; Leen A F M Van Garsse; Thomas T Poels; Peter de Jaegere; Robert M A van der Boon; Ben M Swinkels; Jurriën M Ten Berg; Frank van der Kley; Martin J Schalij; Jan Baan; Ricardo Cocchieri; Guus R G Brueren; Albert H M van Straten; Peter den Heijer; Mohamed Bentala; Vincent van Ommen; Jolanda Kluin; Pieter R Stella; Martin H Prins; Jos G Maessen; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-Sestamibi.

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Birgit Langhans; Jörg Hausleiter; Carolin Sonne; Robert A Byrne; Julinda Mehilli; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig; Stefan Martinoff; Tareq Ibrahim
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Su C Ang; Praveen Indraratna; Con Manganas; Paul Bannon; Deborah Black; David Tian; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Prognostic value of T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Baiyan Zhuang; Arlene Sirajuddin; Shuli Wang; Andrew Arai; Shihua Zhao; Minjie Lu
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Prognostic value of non-contrast myocardial T1 mapping in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Xi Yang; Hong-Bing Luo; Jie-Ke Liu; Xue-Ming Li; Chun-Hua Wang; Ke Shi; Jing Ren; Peng Zhou
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Cardiovascular imaging 2016 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Vande Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  T1 mapping in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Dina Radenkovic; Sebastian Weingärtner; Lewis Ricketts; James C Moon; Gabriella Captur
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Assessment of 10-Year Left-Ventricular-Remodeling by CMR in Patients Following Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Nina Rank; Lukas Stoiber; Mithal Nasser; Radu Tanacli; Christian Stehning; Jan Knierim; Felix Schoenrath; Burkert Pieske; Volkmar Falk; Titus Kuehne; Alexander Meyer; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Prognostic Impact of Myocardial Extracellular Volume Fraction Assessment Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Patients Treated With Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Masataka Suzuki; Takayoshi Toba; Yu Izawa; Hiroshi Fujita; Keisuke Miwa; Yu Takahashi; Hiroyuki Toh; Hiroyuki Kawamori; Hiromasa Otake; Hidekazu Tanaka; Sei Fujiwara; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Atsushi K Kono; Kenji Okada; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas A Treibel; Rebecca Kozor; Rebecca Schofield; Giulia Benedetti; Marianna Fontana; Anish N Bhuva; Amir Sheikh; Begoña López; Arantxa González; Charlotte Manisty; Guy Lloyd; Peter Kellman; Javier Díez; James C Moon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chuan Zhang; Jie Liu; Shu Qin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.