Literature DB >> 27460365

Using logic models to enhance the methodological quality of primary health-care interventions: guidance from an intervention to promote nutrition care by general practitioners and practice nurses.

Lauren Ball1, Dianne Ball2, Michael Leveritt3, Sumantra Ray4, Clare Collins5, Elizabeth Patterson6, Gina Ambrosini7, Patricia Lee1, Wendy Chaboyer1.   

Abstract

The methodological designs underpinning many primary health-care interventions are not rigorous. Logic models can be used to support intervention planning, implementation and evaluation in the primary health-care setting. Logic models provide a systematic and visual way of facilitating shared understanding of the rationale for the intervention, the planned activities, expected outcomes, evaluation strategy and required resources. This article provides guidance for primary health-care practitioners and researchers on the use of logic models for enhancing methodological rigour of interventions. The article outlines the recommended steps in developing a logic model using the 'NutriCare' intervention as an example. The 'NutriCare' intervention is based in the Australian primary health-care setting and promotes nutrition care by general practitioners and practice nurses. The recommended approach involves canvassing the views of all stakeholders who have valuable and informed opinions about the planned project. The following four targeted, iterative steps are recommended: (1) confirm situation, intervention aim and target population; (2) document expected outcomes and outputs of the intervention; (3) identify and describe assumptions, external factors and inputs; and (4) confirm intervention components. Over a period of 2 months, three primary health-care researchers and one health-services consultant led the collaborative development of the 'NutriCare' logic model. Primary health-care practitioners and researchers are encouraged to develop a logic model when planning interventions to maximise the methodological rigour of studies, confirm that data required to answer the question are captured and ensure that the intervention meets the project goals.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27460365     DOI: 10.1071/PY16038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Prim Health        ISSN: 1448-7527            Impact factor:   1.307


  5 in total

1.  Evidence-Based Public Health Provided Through Local Health Departments: Importance of Academic-Practice Partnerships.

Authors:  Paul Campbell Erwin; Renee G Parks; Stephanie Mazzucca; Peg Allen; Elizabeth A Baker; Hengrui Hu; Johnnetta Davis-Joyce; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Protocol of a multimethod descriptive study: adapting hospital-to-home transitional care interventions to the rural healthcare context in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Mary T Fox; Souraya Sidani; Jeffrey I Butler; Mark W Skinner; Manal Alzghoul
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Using intervention mapping to develop an outpatient nursing nutritional intervention to improve nutritional status in undernourished patients planned for surgery.

Authors:  Harm H J van Noort; Maud Heinen; Monique van Asseldonk; Roelof G A Ettema; Hester Vermeulen; Getty Huisman-de Waal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Development and Validation of a Logic Model for Utilization of Nutrition Support among Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Ngou In Pang; Ruixue Bie; Carolina Oi Lam Ung; Hao Hu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Investigating Whether the Mediterranean Dietary Pattern Is Integrated in Routine Dietetic Practice for Management of Chronic Conditions: A National Survey of Dietitians.

Authors:  Hannah L Mayr; Sarah P Kostjasyn; Katrina L Campbell; Michelle Palmer; Ingrid J Hickman
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.