Literature DB >> 27460025

Toward better understanding and feasibility of controlling greenhouse gas emissions from treatment of industrial wastewater with activated sludge.

Wei-Hsiang Chen1, Jun-Hong Yang2, Chung-Shin Yuan2, Ying-Hsien Yang3.   

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been recognized as important sources for anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. The objective of the study was to thoroughly investigate a typical industrial WWTP in southern Taiwan in winter and summer which possesses the emission factors close to those reported values, with the analyses of emission factors, mass fluxes, fugacity, lab-scale in situ experiments, and impact assessment. The activated sludge was the important source in winter and summer, and nitrous oxide (N2O) was the main contributor (e.g., 57 to 91 % of total GHG emission in a unit of kg carbon dioxide-equivalent/kg chemical oxygen demand). Albeit important for the GHGs in the atmosphere, the fractional contribution of the GHG emission to the carbon or nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment was negligible (e.g., less than 1.5 %). In comparison with the sludge concentration or retention time, adjusting the aeration rate was more effective to diminish the GHG emission in the activated sludge without significantly affecting the treated water quality. When the aeration rate in the activated sludge simulation was reduced by 75 %, the mass flux of N2O could be diminished by up to 53 % (from 9.6 to 4.5 mg/m2-day). The total emission in the WWTP (including carbon dioxide, methane, and N2O) would decrease by 46 % (from 0.67 to 0.36 kg CO2-equiv/kg COD). However, the more important benefit of changing the aeration rate was lowering the energy consumption in operation of the WWTP, as the fractional contribution of pumping to the total emission from the WWTP ranged from 46 to 93 % within the range of the aeration rate tested. Under the circumstance in which reducing the burden of climate change is a global campaign, the findings provide insight regarding the GHG emission from treatment of industrial wastewater and the associated impact on the treatment performance and possible mitigation strategies by operational modifications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activated sludge; Emission factor; Fugacity; Greenhouse gas; Industrial wastewater; Mass balance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27460025     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7183-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs.

Authors:  Xavier Flores-Alsina; Magnus Arnell; Youri Amerlinck; Lluís Corominas; Krist V Gernaey; Lisha Guo; Erik Lindblom; Ingmar Nopens; Jose Porro; Andy Shaw; Laura Snip; Peter A Vanrolleghem; Ulf Jeppsson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Wastewater treatment in the pulp-and-paper industry: A review of treatment processes and the associated greenhouse gas emission.

Authors:  Omid Ashrafi; Laleh Yerushalmi; Fariborz Haghighat
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Application of dynamic models to estimate greenhouse gas emission by wastewater treatment plants of the pulp and paper industry.

Authors:  Omid Ashrafi; Laleh Yerushalmi; Fariborz Haghighat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Influence of data collection schemes on the Life Cycle Assessment of a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Hiroko Yoshida; Julie Clavreul; Charlotte Scheutz; Thomas H Christensen
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Methane emissions from wastewater management.

Authors:  M El-Fadel; M Massoud
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Methane emissions from a full-scale A/A/O wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Jinhe Wang; Jian Zhang; Huijun Xie; Pengyu Qi; Yangang Ren; Zhen Hu
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Nitrous oxide emissions and dissolved oxygen profiling in a full-scale nitrifying activated sludge treatment plant.

Authors:  Amina Aboobakar; Elise Cartmell; Tom Stephenson; Mark Jones; Peter Vale; Gabriela Dotro
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Dynamics of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emission during full-scale reject water treatment.

Authors:  Marlies J Kampschreur; Wouter R L van der Star; Hubert A Wielders; Jan Willem Mulder; Mike S M Jetten; Mark C M van Loosdrecht
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Fossil organic carbon in wastewater and its fate in treatment plants.

Authors:  Yingyu Law; Geraldine E Jacobsen; Andrew M Smith; Zhiguo Yuan; Paul Lant
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 10.  Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).

Authors:  Jean Bogner; Riitta Pipatti; Seiji Hashimoto; Cristobal Diaz; Katarina Mareckova; Luis Diaz; Peter Kjeldsen; Suvi Monni; Andre Faaij; Qingxian Gao; Tianzhu Zhang; Mohammed Abdelrafie Ahmed; R T M Sutamihardja; Robert Gregory
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2008-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.