Literature DB >> 27459399

High Quality Factor Mechanical Resonators Based on WSe2 Monolayers.

Nicolas Morell1, Antoine Reserbat-Plantey1, Ioannis Tsioutsios1, Kevin G Schädler1, François Dubin2, Frank H L Koppens1, Adrian Bachtold1.   

Abstract

Suspended monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) are membranes that combine ultralow mass and exceptional optical properties, making them intriguing materials for opto-mechanical applications. However, the low measured quality factor of TMD resonators has been a roadblock so far. Here, we report an ultrasensitive optical readout of monolayer TMD resonators that allows us to reveal their mechanical properties at cryogenic temperatures. We find that the quality factor of monolayer WSe2 resonators greatly increases below room temperature, reaching values as high as 1.6 × 10(4) at liquid nitrogen temperature and 4.7 × 10(4) at liquid helium temperature. This surpasses the quality factor of monolayer graphene resonators with similar surface areas. Upon cooling the resonator, the resonant frequency increases significantly due to the thermal contraction of the WSe2 lattice. These measurements allow us to experimentally study the thermal expansion coefficient of WSe2 monolayers for the first time. High Q-factors are also found in resonators based on MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayers. The high quality-factor found in this work opens new possibilities for coupling mechanical vibrational states to two-dimensional excitons, valley pseudospins, and single quantum emitters and for quantum opto-mechanical experiments based on the Casimir interaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D materials; NEMS; Nanomechanical resonators; WSe2; optomechanics; transition metal-dichalcogenides (TMD)

Year:  2016        PMID: 27459399      PMCID: PMC5023224          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


Monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are two-dimensional direct bandgap semiconductors that have attracted considerable attention because of their unique optical properties.[1−12] In principle, suspending such monolayer TMDs should form remarkable opto-mechanical resonators. They are extremely thin, like graphene.[13−17] Owing to their low mass, the mechanical vibrational states of TMD resonators are extremely sensitive to external force[18] and adsorbed mass.[19] This holds promise for sensing applications and for coupling mechanical vibrational states to various optical degrees of freedom of monolayer TMDs, such as bright and dark two-dimensional excitons,[1,2] valley pseudospins,[3−5] and single quantum emitters embedded in the monolayer.[6−9] However, semiconducting TMD mechanical resonators have been operated only at room temperature thus far.[20−25] Room-temperature operation is detrimental to opto-mechanical experiments, because the recombination and coherence time of two-dimensional excitons and valley pseudospins are short, and single quantum emitters only emerge at cryogenic temperatures. An even greater obstacle for all these experiments is the low quality factor Q achieved so far in monolayer TMD mechanical resonators (Q ≤ 100).[20,22,23] Therefore, it is important to develop a method to measure TMD resonators at cryogenic temperature in order to reduce damping. Electrical mixing techniques have been used to measure nanotube, graphene resonators, and other metallic nanosystems at helium temperature[14−16,26−28] but such techniques are challenging to apply to semiconducting TMD resonators without Joule heating because of their high electrical resistance. Here, we show that optical detection of TMD resonators can be employed down to 3.5 K without being affected by laser heating. This is possible because we have found that the Q-factor becomes extremely high at low temperature, allowing us to detect mechanical vibrations with low laser power. We produce drumhead nanoresonators based on WSe2 monolayers. The fabrication relies on the dry transfer of thin WSe2 crystals over prestructured holes (Figure a,b).[29] Regions corresponding to monolayers are identified by the enhanced emission in photoluminescence maps and the corresponding spectra (Figure c,e).[1,2,10] At 3.5 K, these spectra feature narrow peaks associated with two-dimensional excitons and trions, labeled as X0 and T, respectively.[4] The observation of trions indicates that the monolayer is doped, which we attribute to molecules adsorbed on its surface.
Figure 1

WSe2 monolayer mechanical resonator. (a) Sketch of the device and experimental setup. The WSe2 resonator is driven capacitively by dc and ac voltages Vgdc and δVg, while its nanomotion is measured by optical interferometry. The WSe2 resonator is a mobile absorber in an optical standing wave produced by a 633 nm probe laser. The modulated laser reflection intensity is then measured with an APD feeding a spectrum analyzer. Additional photoluminescence spectroscopy measurements can be done simultaneously using a spectrometer. (b) Optical image of an array of WSe2 mechanical resonators. For the same device, both emission and a mechanical spectrum are recorded at each laser position, thus providing a spatial map of the WSe2 emission (c), and the extracted mechanical resonance frequency fm (d). For each position of the laser, we record the mechanical spectrum and we extract the resonance frequency of the fundamental mode. (e) Photoluminescence spectra of monolayer WSe2 at 300 K (red) and 3.5 K (blue). (f) Spatial map of the nanomotion amplitude for a WSe2 monolayer resonator with the drive amplitude δVg = l mV. Dash line represents the WSe2 resonator outline. The drum studied in (e,f) is marked by an arrow in (b,c).

WSe2 monolayer mechanical resonator. (a) Sketch of the device and experimental setup. The WSe2 resonator is driven capacitively by dc and ac voltages Vgdc and δVg, while its nanomotion is measured by optical interferometry. The WSe2 resonator is a mobile absorber in an optical standing wave produced by a 633 nm probe laser. The modulated laser reflection intensity is then measured with an APD feeding a spectrum analyzer. Additional photoluminescence spectroscopy measurements can be done simultaneously using a spectrometer. (b) Optical image of an array of WSe2 mechanical resonators. For the same device, both emission and a mechanical spectrum are recorded at each laser position, thus providing a spatial map of the WSe2 emission (c), and the extracted mechanical resonance frequency fm (d). For each position of the laser, we record the mechanical spectrum and we extract the resonance frequency of the fundamental mode. (e) Photoluminescence spectra of monolayer WSe2 at 300 K (red) and 3.5 K (blue). (f) Spatial map of the nanomotion amplitude for a WSe2 monolayer resonator with the drive amplitude δVg = l mV. Dash line represents the WSe2 resonator outline. The drum studied in (e,f) is marked by an arrow in (b,c). The mechanical vibrations are detected by optical interferometry[13,30] using ultralow laser power down to 70 nW in order to prevent heating. A continuous wave laser impinges on the device, and the reflected laser light is modulated by an amount proportional to displacement of the resonator. More specifically, the laser forms a standing wave pattern in the direction perpendicular to the Si substrate, such that the displacement of the WSe2 monolayer modifies its optical absorption.[13,30] In order to prevent heating of the WSe2 lattice, the laser power is kept as low as possible, and the reflected light is collected with a large numerical aperture objective and detected with an avalanche photodetector (APD). The resulting imprecision of the mechanical displacement is limited by the shot noise of the laser down to about 1 μW (cf. Supplementary Figure 1). This allows us to detect the driven vibrations of WSe2 monolayers at 3.5 K with laser power down to 70nW. We record the spatial shape of the mechanical mode and its resonant frequency by confocal microscopy (Figure d,f). Motion is actuated by applying an oscillating voltage between the monolayer and the back-gate of the substrate[13] that together form a capacitor. This capacitive actuation is possible because the monolayer is doped. Measurements presented in this Letter are carried out in the linear regime; an example of nonlinear Duffing response is shown in Supplementary Figure 5. The dramatic improvement in quality factor by cooling can be seen in Figure a, which shows the frequency spectrum of two driven resonators at different temperatures. For the best resonator, we observe ultrahigh quality factors up to Q = fm/Γm ∼ 47 000 at helium temperature, where fm is the resonant frequency and Γm is the resonance line-width. This is more than 2 orders of magnitude higher than the Q-factor of monolayer TMD resonators previously measured.[20,22,23] This also surpasses by a factor 3 the highest measured Q-factor of graphene resonators with similar dimensions and cooled at helium-4 temperature.[14,15] Upon increasing the cryostat temperature, the Q-factor decreases (Figure b). It reaches Q ∼ 166 at room temperature, a value consistent with previous reports.[20,22,23]
Figure 2

High Q-factor WSe2 mechanical resonators. (a) Resonator displacement as a function of drive frequency for devices A (shown in Figure e,f) and B. The solid red line is a Lorentzian fit to the data (blue points). We set δVg = 15 mV at 3.5 and 75 K and 100 mV at 300 K. (b) Mechanical damping (Q–1) as a function of cryostat temperature. The data points below 110 K are taken with 200 nW laser power and 400 nW otherwise. We use δVg between 10–50 mV depending on the temperature.

High Q-factor WSe2 mechanical resonators. (a) Resonator displacement as a function of drive frequency for devices A (shown in Figure e,f) and B. The solid red line is a Lorentzian fit to the data (blue points). We set δVg = 15 mV at 3.5 and 75 K and 100 mV at 300 K. (b) Mechanical damping (Q–1) as a function of cryostat temperature. The data points below 110 K are taken with 200 nW laser power and 400 nW otherwise. We use δVg between 10–50 mV depending on the temperature. Central to achieving these ultrahigh Q-factors is the low laser power used to detect the vibrations. Figure a displays the quality factor as a function of laser power P. We find that the quality factor remains approximately constant for P below ∼200 nW. For larger P, the Q-factor decreases, indicating that the laser perturbs the dynamics of the resonator. In the following, we show that the laser affects the resonator through two physical processes: absorption heating and dynamical photothermal back-action.[30,31] In absorption heating, the laser increases the temperature of the device lattice, so that the damping Q–1 is expected to increase (as shown in Figure b). Dynamical photothermal back-action arises from the gradient of the photothermal force and the finite response time of the resonator to a temperature change.[31] The resulting retarded force modifies the damping of the resonator by Δ(Q–1) and, therefore, its effective temperature. Depending on the sign of the gradient, Δ(Q–1) is positive and the resonator cools down, or Δ(Q–1) is negative and the resonator heats up.[31]
Figure 3

Mechanical damping, laser-induced heating, and Joule heating. Mechanical damping (Q–1) as a function of laser power (a) and backgate voltage Vgdc (b). The red line in (b) is a fit to eq . We use δVg = 10 mV. (c) Resonator displacement noise power density S taken at 20 K for different laser powers P. The area of the Lorentzian fit (red curve) corresponds to the displacement variance . The increase of this area with P is a signature of laser-induced heating. (d) Energy of the resonator mode meffωm2 extracted from noise spectra as a function of the cryostat temperature. Dashed line corresponds to meffω2 = kBT.

Mechanical damping, laser-induced heating, and Joule heating. Mechanical damping (Q–1) as a function of laser power (a) and backgate voltage Vgdc (b). The red line in (b) is a fit to eq . We use δVg = 10 mV. (c) Resonator displacement noise power density S taken at 20 K for different laser powers P. The area of the Lorentzian fit (red curve) corresponds to the displacement variance . The increase of this area with P is a signature of laser-induced heating. (d) Energy of the resonator mode meffωm2 extracted from noise spectra as a function of the cryostat temperature. Dashed line corresponds to meffω2 = kBT. We measure the temperature of the mechanical mode by detecting the thermal vibrations of the resonator (Figure c). The capacitive force is switched off, and the resulting displacement noise is recorded with a spectrum analyzer. Figure c shows that upon increasing P, the integrated area of the thermal resonance and its line width get both larger with the cryostat temperature set at Tcryo = 20 K. This shows that the temperature Tmode of the mechanical mode and the damping Q–1 both increase, which is in agreement with the absorption heating process. The thermal resonance area in the displacement spectrum allows to quantify Tmode using meffωm2 = kBTmode with meff the effective mass of the mechanical mode and ωm = 2πfm. Figure d shows that Tmode scales roughly linearly with Tcryo at high temperature, indicating that the resonator thermalizes with the cryostat. However, the resonance area at Tcryo = 20 K corresponds to Tmode ∼ 50 K, showing that absorption heating is substantial. The reason for this observed heating is the particularly large laser power needed to resolve thermal vibrations, that is, P > 10 μW. We find that dynamical photothermal back-action also lowers the Q-factor. For temperature cryostat above 70 K, we find that the mechanical mode gets effectively colder upon increasing P (cf. Supplementary Figure 2), indicating that dynamical photothermal cooling becomes more efficient than absorption heating. The dynamical photothermal cooling is related to the force gradient ∂F/∂z induced by the standing wave of the laser in the direction perpendicular to the substrate, as shown in ref (30). The cooling of the mode observed in our experiment indicates that ∂F/∂z > 0 and Δ(Q–1) > 0.[31] This confirms that the high Q-factors measured at low power in Figure do not originate from the narrowing of the mechanical line width due to dynamical photothermal back-action. The high Q-factors of capacitively driven vibrations measured at low laser power are obtained upon tuning the back-gate voltage Vgdc as close as possible to the equivalent work function difference Δϕ between the monolayer and the back-gate (Figure b). Otherwise, the Q-factor can significantly decrease due to the electronic Joule dissipation of the displacement current through the monolayer, the current being generated by the TMD motion. The contribution of the Joule dissipation iswhere Cg′ is the derivative of the capacitance between the suspended monolayer and the back-gate with respect to the displacement, and R is an effective electrical resistance of the monolayer.[27] Our data are well described by Qtotal–1 = QWSe–1 + QJ–1 where QWSe is the quality factor measured at Vgd ≈ Δϕ (Figure b). The comparison between the measurements and eq leads to R = 305 kΩ. Such a value is comparable to the sheet resistance of a TMD monolayer with weak doping.[32,33] We emphasize that a direct comparison between R and the sheet resistance is nontrivial, because of the uncertainties in the geometry associated with R. We now turn our attention to the temperature dependence of the resonant frequency, which is found to be particularly strong (Figure a). This behavior is attributed to the thermal expansion of the membrane, which modifies the tensile strain ϵ of the suspended monolayer. The presence of tensile strain is further supported by the convex parabola observed in the dependence of the resonant frequency on the static back-gate voltage (Figure c). The convex parabola, which has been observed in highly strained nanotube and graphene resonators,[16] has an electrostatic origin. For a circular membrane under tensile stress, the resonant frequency is given by[34]Here, E2D = 116 N·m–1 is the two-dimensional Young modulus of WSe2 monolayer,[35]r = 1.5 μm is the drum radius, and d = 180 nm is the equivalent separation between the membrane and the back-gate electrode. The measurements can be well described by eq using meff = 3 × 10–17 kg. The obtained mass is close to the value expected from the two-dimensional mass density ρ = 12 μg.m–2 of WSe2, which gives meff = 0.27πr2ρ = 2.3 × 10–17 kg. This good agreement shows that the resonator mass predominantly consists of the WSe2 lattice with only a small fraction of additional mass from adsorbed molecules.
Figure 4

Resonant frequency of the WSe2 mechanical resonator. a: Mechanical resonant frequency fm as a function of temperature. We use δVg between 10–50 mV depending on the temperature. Red curve in (a) is a fit to eq with Vgdc ≈ Δϕ and using the thermal expansion coefficient α of WSe2 predicted in ref (35) and shown in (b). The gray area represents the imprecision due to the thermal expansion coefficient of the substrate. (c) fm as a function of the backgate voltage measured at 130 K. The red curve is the capacitive softening quantified by eq . We set δVg = 10 mV.

Resonant frequency of the WSe2 mechanical resonator. a: Mechanical resonant frequency fm as a function of temperature. We use δVg between 10–50 mV depending on the temperature. Red curve in (a) is a fit to eq with Vgdc ≈ Δϕ and using the thermal expansion coefficient α of WSe2 predicted in ref (35) and shown in (b). The gray area represents the imprecision due to the thermal expansion coefficient of the substrate. (c) fm as a function of the backgate voltage measured at 130 K. The red curve is the capacitive softening quantified by eq . We set δVg = 10 mV. Our measurements allow us to study the thermal expansion coefficient αWSe, an important mechanical property of monolayer TMDs that has not been experimentally investigated thus far. That is, we use the thermal expansion coefficient αWSe(T) calculated in the theory work in ref (35) in order to reproduce the measured temperature dependence of the resonant frequency. Figure b shows that the calculated αWSe(T) is positive, in stark contrast to the negative coefficient encountered in many two-dimensional layers, such as graphene[15,36,37] and hexagonal boron nitride.[38] The description of the measured fm(T) with the calculated αWSe(T) is obtained using eq with Vgdc ≈ Δϕ and ϵ = ϵ0 – αWSe (T0)dT0 and using the built-in strain ϵ0 at room temperature as a fitting parameter (Figure a); the best agreement between the measurements and eq is obtained with ϵ0 = 0.034%. The thermal expansion of the substrate contributes to ϵ by a small amount since αSi(T),αSiO(T) ≪ αWSe(T); an upper bound of the substrate contribution to the resonant frequency is indicated by the gray area in Figure a. The temperature dependence of the resonant frequency of the other measured WSe2 resonators is similar to that presented here (cf. Supplementary Figure 3), which further confirms the thermal expansion coefficient in Figure b. Overall, our measurements show that the thermal expansion coefficient of WSe2 is positive and reaches a high value at room temperature (αWSe ∼ 7 × 10–6 K–1). The precise knowledge of the thermal coefficient of WSe2 over a wide temperature range is important for heat management and designing future (opto-) electronic van der Waals heterostructures. High Q-factors are also observed in resonators based on other TMD monolayers, such as MoS2 and MoSe2. Figure shows the Q-factor of all the seven TMD resonators measured at helium temperature with P < 10 μW. The corresponding spectra are shown in Supplementary Figure 4. All the observed Q-factors are at least 1 order of magnitude higher than the values reported previously and measured at room temperature.
Figure 5

Quality factors of various resonators based on WSe2, MoSe2 and MoS2 monolayers. The measurements are carried out at helium temperature with P < 10 μW.

Quality factors of various resonators based on WSe2, MoSe2 and MoS2 monolayers. The measurements are carried out at helium temperature with P < 10 μW. The origin of the high Q-factors achieved in this work can be attributed to a combination of different factors. First, the low amount of adsorbed molecules is beneficial, because such contamination can increase dissipation through two-level systems[39,40] and the diffusion of adsorbed molecules.[41] Second, the phonon spectrum of TMDs is expected to result in higher Q-factors compared to graphene, because of the lower phonon–phonon scattering rate.[42] Third, the strain of the suspended monolayer can lead to the enhanced Q, since the Q-factor and the resonant frequency vary strongly in the same temperature range, that is, between ∼80 and 300 K. The quality factor Q = fm/Γm is indeed expected to get larger when fm increases, assuming that Γm remains constant.[43−45] However, the increase of fm by a factor 2 can only explain part of the ∼100 enhancement of the Q-factor. The strong temperature dependence of the Q-factor can be associated with the spectral broadening that arises from the interplay of the amplitude fluctuations of thermal vibrations and nonlinearities, such as the Duffing nonlinearity and mode–mode coupling.[46−48] Such spectral broadening is expected to reduce for larger strain, as is observed in our experiments. The effect of spectral broadening can be tested with ring-down experiments[23] but measuring the ring-down in our devices requires large laser power, such that the mechanical line width becomes limited by dynamical photothermal damping. Further work is needed to clarify the underlying physics governing our observed temperature dependence of the Q-factor. We have reported an ultrasensitive optical readout of monolayer TMD resonators that allows us to reveal their mechanical properties at cryogenic temperatures. We report Q-factors up to 4.7 × 104 at 3.5 K, thus surpassing the Q-factor of graphene nanoresonators with similar areas. High Q-factors are obtained using low laser power in order to prevent absorption heating and by tuning the back-gate voltage so that the damping contribution due to the electron-vibration coupling is negligible. Upon cooling the resonators, the resonant frequency increases steadily, which is due to the thermal contraction of the monolayer crystal. Because of the combination of the high mechanical Q-factor and its fascinating optical properties, TMD monolayer provides a unique platform for nano-optomechanics. We envision hybrid optomechanics experiments in which mechanical vibrations are coupled to single quantum emitters[6−9] embedded in the crystal via the strain field[49−52] and to two-dimensional excitons[1,2] and their valley pseudospins[3−5] with a gradient of magnetic field.[11,12] The mechanical vibrations of TMD monolayers can also be coupled to quantum emitters via the Casimir interaction.[53] When placing a quantum emitter, such as a dibenzoterrylene (DBT) molecule, a few tens of nanometers away from the monolayer, vacuum fluctuations lead to extremely large dispersive couplings, opening new possibilities for quantum opto-mechanics experiments.[16]

Methods: Sample Preparation

We pattern electrodes onto the surface of a 285 nm thick SiO2 layer thermally grown on a p-doped Si chip by EBL and thermal evaporation of Au. Holes of 125 nm depth and with diameters ranging from 2 to 5 μm are structured using EBL and subsequent reactive ion etching. Trenches are etched between adjacent holes to avoid buckling of the subsequently transferred WSe2 membrane when the device is placed in vacuum. WSe2 is exfoliated mechanically using commercial PDMS sheets. Large WSe2 monolayers on the PDMS are identified under an optical microscope by contrast measurement. Identified monolayers are then transferred to target hole arrays using a three-axis micromanipulator. The result is an array of electrically contacted single layer WSe2 membranes (Figure b).

Methods: Capacitive Device Actuation and Optical Readout

Measurements are performed in a vacuum cryostat from 3 to 300 K. Our devices are actuated capacitively using a waveform generator and a low-noise voltage source to provide ac and dc voltage signals. We use a custom-built confocal microscope to locally illuminate the device with 633 nm (HeNe) laser light and read out the reflected light using a high-frequency APD.
  36 in total

1.  Damping of nanomechanical resonators.

Authors:  Quirin P Unterreithmeier; Thomas Faust; Jörg P Kotthaus
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Cavity cooling of a microlever.

Authors:  Constanze Höhberger Metzger; Khaled Karrai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2.

Authors:  Aaron M Jones; Hongyi Yu; Nirmal J Ghimire; Sanfeng Wu; Grant Aivazian; Jason S Ross; Bo Zhao; Jiaqiang Yan; David G Mandrus; Di Xiao; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Single-layer MoS(2) mechanical resonators.

Authors:  Andres Castellanos-Gomez; Ronald van Leeuwen; Michele Buscema; Herre S J van der Zant; Gary A Steele; Warner J Venstra
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe2 structures.

Authors:  M Koperski; K Nogajewski; A Arora; V Cherkez; P Mallet; J-Y Veuillen; J Marcus; P Kossacki; M Potemski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 39.213

6.  Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors.

Authors:  Yu-Ming He; Genevieve Clark; John R Schaibley; Yu He; Ming-Cheng Chen; Yu-Jia Wei; Xing Ding; Qiang Zhang; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu; Chao-Yang Lu; Jian-Wei Pan
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Photothermal self-oscillation and laser cooling of graphene optomechanical systems.

Authors:  Robert A Barton; Isaac R Storch; Vivekananda P Adiga; Reyu Sakakibara; Benjamin R Cipriany; B Ilic; Si Ping Wang; Peijie Ong; Paul L McEuen; Jeevak M Parpia; Harold G Craighead
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Carrier and polarization dynamics in monolayer MoS2.

Authors:  D Lagarde; L Bouet; X Marie; C R Zhu; B L Liu; T Amand; P H Tan; B Urbaszek
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  MoS2 nanoresonators: intrinsically better than graphene?

Authors:  Jin-Wu Jiang; Harold S Park; Timon Rabczuk
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 7.790

10.  Electromechanical control of nitrogen-vacancy defect emission using graphene NEMS.

Authors:  Antoine Reserbat-Plantey; Kevin G Schädler; Louis Gaudreau; Gabriele Navickaite; Johannes Güttinger; Darrick Chang; Costanza Toninelli; Adrian Bachtold; Frank H L Koppens
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  9 in total

1.  Fabry-Perot interferometric calibration of van der Waals material-based nanomechanical resonators.

Authors:  Myrron Albert Callera Aguila; Joshoua Condicion Esmenda; Jyh-Yang Wang; Teik-Hui Lee; Chi-Yuan Yang; Kung-Hsuan Lin; Kuei-Shu Chang-Liao; Sergey Kafanov; Yuri A Pashkin; Chii-Dong Chen
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-11-23

2.  Broadband reconfigurable logic gates in phonon waveguides.

Authors:  D Hatanaka; T Darras; I Mahboob; K Onomitsu; H Yamaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Real-Time Measurement of Nanotube Resonator Fluctuations in an Electron Microscope.

Authors:  I Tsioutsios; A Tavernarakis; J Osmond; P Verlot; A Bachtold
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  On-chip Heaters for Tension Tuning of Graphene Nanodrums.

Authors:  Dejan Davidovikj; Menno Poot; Santiago J Cartamil-Bueno; Herre S J van der Zant; Peter G Steeneken
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Tunable Strong Coupling of Mechanical Resonance between Spatially Separated FePS3 Nanodrums.

Authors:  Makars Šiškins; Ekaterina Sokolovskaya; Martin Lee; Samuel Mañas-Valero; Dejan Davidovikj; Herre S J van der Zant; Peter G Steeneken
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 6.  A Review on Graphene-Based Nano-Electromechanical Resonators: Fabrication, Performance, and Applications.

Authors:  Yang Xiao; Fang Luo; Yuchen Zhang; Feng Hu; Mengjian Zhu; Shiqiao Qin
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Room-Temperature Pressure-Induced Optically-Actuated Fabry-Perot Nanomechanical Resonator with Multilayer Graphene Diaphragm in Air.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Tian Lan; Xiyu Yu; Nan Bo; Jingyu Dong; Shangchun Fan
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Energy Dissipation Pathways in Few-Layer MoS2 Nanoelectromechanical Systems.

Authors:  Bernard R Matis; Brian H Houston; Jeffrey W Baldwin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gas-Phase Formation of Highly Luminescent 2D GaSe Nanoparticle Ensembles in a Nonequilibrium Laser Ablation Process.

Authors:  Salah Elafandi; Zabihollah Ahmadi; Nurul Azam; Masoud Mahjouri-Samani
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.076

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.