Literature DB >> 27459154

Spatio-temporal Analysis of the Genetic Diversity of Arctic Rabies Viruses and Their Reservoir Hosts in Greenland.

Dennis Hanke1, Conrad M Freuling2, Susanne Fischer3, Karsten Hueffer4, Kris Hundertmark5, Susan Nadin-Davis6, Denise Marston7, Anthony R Fooks7,8, Anette Bøtner9, Thomas C Mettenleiter2, Martin Beer1, Thomas B Rasmussen9, Thomas F Müller2, Dirk Höper1.   

Abstract

There has been limited knowledge on spatio-temporal epidemiology of zoonotic arctic fox rabies among countries bordering the Arctic, in particular Greenland. Previous molecular epidemiological studies have suggested the occurrence of one particular arctic rabies virus (RABV) lineage (arctic-3), but have been limited by a low number of available samples preventing in-depth high resolution phylogenetic analysis of RABVs at that time. However, an improved knowledge of the evolution, at a molecular level, of the circulating RABVs and a better understanding of the historical perspective of the disease in Greenland is necessary for better direct control measures on the island. These issues have been addressed by investigating the spatio-temporal genetic diversity of arctic RABVs and their reservoir host, the arctic fox, in Greenland using both full and partial genome sequences. Using a unique set of 79 arctic RABV full genome sequences from Greenland, Canada, USA (Alaska) and Russia obtained between 1977 and 2014, a description of the historic context in relation to the genetic diversity of currently circulating RABV in Greenland and neighboring Canadian Northern territories has been provided. The phylogenetic analysis confirmed delineation into four major arctic RABV lineages (arctic 1-4) with viruses from Greenland exclusively grouping into the circumpolar arctic-3 lineage. High resolution analysis enabled distinction of seven geographically distinct subclades (3.I - 3.VII) with two subclades containing viruses from both Greenland and Canada. By combining analysis of full length RABV genome sequences and host derived sequences encoding mitochondrial proteins obtained simultaneously from brain tissues of 49 arctic foxes, the interaction of viruses and their hosts was explored in detail. Such an approach can serve as a blueprint for analysis of infectious disease dynamics and virus-host interdependencies. The results showed a fine-scale spatial population structure in Greenland arctic foxes based on mitochondrial sequences, but provided no evidence for independent isolated evolutionary development of RABV in different arctic fox lineages. These data are invaluable to support future initiatives for arctic fox rabies control and elimination in Greenland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27459154      PMCID: PMC4961414          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


Introduction

Rabies, an ancient disease known for millennia, is caused by lyssaviruses of the Rhabdoviridae family [1]. The prototypical rabies virus (RABV) has a global distribution and the domestic dog is the host reservoir responsible for the vast majority of the estimated 60,000 human rabies cases annually [2]. Other RABV host reservoirs in terrestrial wildlife are primarily meso-carnivores. In Arctic regions, RABV is believed to be maintained by the arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) [3], which has a circumpolar distribution and has uniquely adapted to the extreme climatic and ecologic conditions of this northern environment [4]. The distribution and group size of arctic foxes are strongly influenced by the distribution and density of prey [5]. Notably, arctic foxes have considerably variable home ranges (5–120 km²) than any other meso-carnivore RABV reservoir host [6-8] and can roam over large areas and migrate over extremely long distances [4,8]. From an epidemiological point of view, this may be an important factor for the spread of RABV in northern Polar regions where rabies-like diseases have been described for about 150 years [9], specifically among sledge dogs in Greenland as early as 1859. However, confirmation of the existence of rabies in Greenland was only provided 100 years later, when Jenkins and Wamberg [10] demonstrated the presence of RABV in dogs and arctic foxes. The disease is considered endemic among the arctic fox population of Greenland [11,12]. A recent epidemiological study of arctic fox rabies in Greenland between 1969 and 2011 revealed that the disease flared up every 5–10 years on average, whereby most rabid foxes were reported from southern Greenland [13]. Historically, some properties of arctic RABVs were regarded as “atypical” [14]. However, early genetic virus characterizations based on the nucleoprotein (N) gene clearly identified it as RABV but as a separate virus lineage designated as “arctic” [15]. This lineage circulates throughout the circumpolar region including northern regions of North America, Europe, and Asia. More detailed phylogenetic analyses revealed that the arctic RABV variant can be further delineated into at least four distinct groups [16-18]. The arctic-1 lineage, recovered from southern Ontario, Canada, in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, represented the remnants of an epidemic that spread from northern Canada in the mid-1900s; reports of this strain are now rare due to the rabies control program carried out by provincial authorities. The arctic-4 lineage has only ever been recovered from regions of Alaska and viruses of the arctic-2 lineage appear to be restricted to Siberia, the Russian Far East, and Alaska. In contrast, lineage arctic-3 has a circumpolar distribution [17]. Arctic rabies was also detected on the European Svalbard Islands with the prevailing RABV lineage having a closer phylogenetic relationship to those occurring in the polar regions of Russia [19]. Viruses closely related to those of the arctic clade have been designated as ‘arctic-like’ or ‘arctic-related’ but have a broad distribution in central, east, and southeast Asia [18,20]. Published phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that RABV isolates from Greenland belong to the arctic-3 lineage [16,17]. These studies did not allow for a more comprehensive evolutionary analysis as the datasets were restricted in terms of the number of samples, time, geographic origin, and sequence length. In this present study, a comprehensive panel of 58 RABVs from Greenland between 1990 and 2014 was analyzed. Additionally, 24 arctic RABVs from Canada/Alaska and Russia were also sequenced and added to this dataset to provide some context to the situation in Greenland. The principal objectives were (i) to infer the viral phylogenetic relationships in space and time based on complete genome sequences and (ii) to gain more insights into the contribution of the host population to the spatial spread of individual RABVs in Greenland. In particular, evidence based on sequence analysis for any links between phylogenetic clusters of arctic RABV and the arctic fox population in Greenland was sought.

Materials and Methods

Origin of viruses

All samples in this study were either taken from officially implemented passive rabies surveillance programs or already existing collections at the (i) DTU National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, (ii) Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), Canada, (iii) Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Germany, and (iv) Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), UK. Samples (Table 1) comprised original clinical brain samples submitted for passive surveillance from arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), cats (Felis silvestris catus), sheep (Ovis aries), and a long-tailed ground squirrel (Citellus undulates) collected between 1977 and 2014 in Greenland, Northern Canada, Alaska and Russia that tested positive in the direct fluorescent antibody test (FAT, [21]). Because this is a multi-center study, RNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing were done using slightly different protocols. The 3 protocols are briefly outlined in the following paragraphs and the respective protocol is denoted for each sample in Table 1. In no case was 5’- or 3’-RACE performed to confirm the genome termini. The accessions for all RABV genome sequences generated in this study are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Details of RABV samples investigated in this study.

Sample name for this study1YearMonth1HostCountryLocation1Area code1Gauss-Krueger coordinates1Arctic fox mitochondrial sequences available 1,2RABV INSDC accession2Sequencing Protocol
NW
Gra21.05-GRL-1-AF-2005200512Arctic foxGreenlandSiorapaluk/Qaanaq177.4770.46yesLM6450171
Gra07.06-GRL-1-AF-200620063Arctic foxGreenlandSavissivik176.0165.08yesLM6450151
Gra14.06-GRL-1-AF-200620064Arctic foxGreenlandPituffik176.3268.45yesLM6450161
Gra03.13-GRL-1-AF-201320133Arctic foxGreenlandQaasuitsup/Thule176.5368.70yesLT5985411
Gra23.06-GRL-2-AF-2006200611Arctic foxGreenlandTorsukattak/Qeqertaq270.0351.27yesLM6450181
Gra03.10-GRL-2-AF-201020106Arctic foxGreenlandNuussuaq/Upernavik274.0757.04yesLM6450191
Gra01.13-GRL-2-AF-201320133Arctic foxGreenlandUpernavik/Kullorsuaq274.5857.22yesLT5985391
Gra02.13-GRL-2-AF-201320133Arctic foxGreenlandUpernavik/Aappilattoq260.1344.30yesLT5985381
Gra03.06-GRL-3-AF-200620062Arctic foxGreenlandQasigiannguit368.4951.05yesLM6450251
Gra04.06-GRL-3-AF-200620062Arctic foxGreenlandNiaqornaarsuk368.1853.27yesLM6450211
Gra05.06-GRL-3-AF-200620062Arctic foxGreenlandAasiaat368.4951.05yesLM6450261
Gra08.06-GRL-3-AF-200620063Arctic foxGreenlandAasiaat368.4252.52yesLM6450231
Gra09.06-GRL-3-AF-200620063Arctic foxGreenlandIginniarfik368.8553.10yesLM6450281
Gra10.06-GRL-3-AF-200620063Arctic foxGreenlandAasiaat368.4252.52yesLM6450241
Gra24.06-GRL-3-D-2006200611DogGreenlandKangaatsiaq368.1853.27NDLM6450221
Gra25.06-GRL-3-AF-2006200611Arctic foxGreenlandQasigiannguit368.4951.05yesLM6450271
Gra02.07-GRL-3-AF-200720071Arctic foxGreenlandKangaatsiaq368.1853.27yesLM6450201
Gra01.14-GRL-3-AF-2014201410Arctic foxGreenlandKangaatsiaq/Ikerasaarsuk368.1453.44yesLT5985431
Gra16.06-GRL-4-AF-200620065Arctic foxGreenlandKangerlussuaq467.0450.41yesLM6450311
Gra09.07-GRL-4-AF-200720074Arctic foxGreenlandSisimiut466.5553.40yesLM6450291
Gra10.07-GRL-4-AF-200720075Arctic foxGreenlandSisimiut466.5553.40yesLM6450301
Gra02.14-GRL-4-AF-201420149Arctic foxGreenlandKangerlussuaq467.0150.70yesLT5985401
Gra03.14-GRL-4-AF-2014201410Arctic foxGreenlandKangerlussuaq467.0150.70yesLT5985421
Gra02.10-GRL-5-AF-201020105Arctic foxGreenlandQoqqut/Nuuk564.1650.54yesLM6450331
Gra05.10-GRL-5-AF-201020106Arctic foxGreenlandKobbefjord/Nuuk564.1051.44yesLM6450321
Gra10.08-GRL-6-AF-2008200811Arctic foxGreenlandPaamiut662.0049.43yesLM6450371
Gra07.09-GRL-6-AF-200920095Arctic foxGreenlandGodthåbsfjorden/Nuuk660.5548.15yesLM6450341
Gra13.09-GRL-6-AF-2009200912Arctic foxGreenlandPaamiut662.0049.43yesLM6450381
Gra06.10-GRL-6-AF-201020109Arctic foxGreenlandPaamiut662.0049.43yesLM6450361
Gra07.10-GRL-6-AF-201020109Arctic foxGreenlandKangilinnguit/Ivittuut661.1448.60yesLM6450351
Gra18.05-GRL-7-AF-2005200511Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03yesLM6450481
Gra01.06-GRL-7-AF-200620061Arctic foxGreenlandNarsaq760.5446.03yesLM6450511
Gra02.06-GRL-7-AF-200620062Arctic foxGreenlandNarsaq760.5446.03yesLM6450521
Gra06.06-GRL-7-C-200620063CatGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03NDLM6450461
Gra20.06-GRL-7-AF-200620069Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03noNA1
Gra21.06-GRL-7-AF-200620069Arctic foxGreenlandNarsarsuaq761.0845.26yesLM6450551
Gra26.06-GRL-7-AF-2006200611Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03noNA1
Gra04.07-GRL-7-AF-200720071Arctic foxGreenlandIgaliko760.5945.25yesLM6450531
Gra05.07-GRL-7-AF-200720072Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03yesLM6450451
Gra15.07-GRL-7-S-2007200710SheepGreenlandNarsarsuaq761.0845.26NDLM6450541
Gra3a.07-GRL-7-AF-200720071Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03yesLM6450491
Gra3b.07-GRL-7-AF-200720071Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03yesLM6450501
Gra02.08-GRL-7-AF-200820084Arctic foxGreenlandAmmassalik765.4337.35yesLM6450561
Gra03.08-GRL-7-AF-200820084Arctic foxGreenlandNanortalik760.0845.14yesLM6450411
Gra13.08-GRL-7-AF-2008200812Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03yesLM6450471
Gra01.09-GRL-7-S-200920091SheepGreenlandNanortalik760.0845.14NDLM6450391
Gra02.09-GRL-7-S-200920091SheepGreenlandNanortalik760.0845.14NDLM6450401
Gra03.09-GRL-7-AF-200920093Arctic foxGreenlandNanortalik760.0845.14yesLM6450421
Gra04.09-GRL-7-AF-200920094Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03yesNA1
Gra01.10-GRL-7-AF-201020101Arctic foxGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03yesLM6450431
Gra01.11-GRL-7-AF-201120113SheepGreenlandQaqortoq760.4346.03NDLM6450441
13232-CAN-NT-AF-19771977-Arctic foxCanadaNorthwest TerritoriesNTNANAyesLT5985371
RV1391-GRL-1-F-199019903Arctic foxGreenlandThule1NANAnoKX0363613
RV1415-GRL-4-F-2001200112Arctic foxGreenlandKangerlussuaq4NANAnoKX0363623
RV1416-GRL-5-AF-200220021Arctic foxGreenlandNuuk5NANAyesKX0363633
RV1417-GRL-3-AF-200220021Arctic foxGreenlandKangaasiaq3NANAyesKX0363643
RV1418-GRL-4-AF-200220021Arctic foxGreenlandKangerlussuaq4NANAyesKX0363653
RV1419-GRL-3-AF-2002200210Arctic foxGreenlandIlulissat3NANAyesKX0363663
RV1420-GRL-4-AF-2002200210Arctic foxGreenlandKangerlussuaq4NANAyesKX0363673
07V1483RFX-USA-AK-RF-20072007NARed foxUSANAAKNANANDKU1984712
89V809AFX-USA-AK-AF-19891989NAArctic foxUSABarrowAKNANAnoKU1984602
90V814AFX-USA-AK-AF-19901990NAArctic foxUSAKwigillingokAKNANAnoKU1984622
90V820RFX-USA-AK-RF-19901990NARed foxUSACold BayAKNANANDKU1984632
12N0215RFX-CAN-NL-RF-20122012NARed foxCanadaSt. John's CoNLNANANDKU1984732
12N0280RFX-CAN-NL-RF-20122012NARed foxCanadaSt. John's CoNLNANANDKU1984742
14N0601RFX-CAN-NL-RF-20142014NARed foxCanadaNainNLNANANDKU1984792
12L1020AFX-CAN-NT-AF-20122012NAArctic foxCanadaHolmanNTNANAnoKU1984722
13L0040AFX-CAN-NT-AF-20132013NAArctic foxCanadaHolmanNTNANAnoKU1984752
13L0094AFX-CAN-NT-AF-20132013NAArctic foxCanadaPaulatukNTNANAnoKU1984762
90L2968AFX-CAN-NT-AF-19901990NAArctic foxCanadaGrise FiordNTNANAnoKU1984612
91L0085AFX-CAN-NT-AF-19911991NAArctic foxCanadaCambridge BayNTNANAnoKU1984642
93N1395AFX-CAN-NT-AF-19931993NAArctic foxCanadaResolute BayNTNANAnoKU1984662
97L1793AFX-CAN-NT-AF-19971997NAArctic foxCanadaArctic BayNTNANAnoKU1984672
13N0473AFX-CAN-NU-AF-20132013NAArctic foxCanadaResolute BayNUNANAnoKU1984772
13N0643AFX-CAN-NU-AF-20132013NAArctic foxCanadaGrise FiordNUNANAnoKU1984782
00N3340RFX-CAN-ON-RF-20002000NARed foxCanadaWalkertonONNANANDKU1984682
01N10254RFX-CAN-ON-RF-20012001NARed foxCanadaShelburneONNANANDKU1984692
92N7894RFX-CAN-ON-RF-19921992NARed foxCanadaSwastikaONNANANDKU1984652
02N2980RFX-CAN-QC-RF-20022002NARed foxCanadaSalluitQCNANANDKU1984702
RV53-USA-F-19881988NAFoxUSANANANANANDDQ0101233
RV250-RUS-Squirrel-19831983NACitellus undulatusRussiaTuviaNANANANDAY3524803
RV1336-RUS-AF-19961996NAArctic foxRussiaYakutiaNANANAnoDQ0101293

1 NA, not available

2 ND, not determined

1 NA, not available 2 ND, not determined

Sequencing protocol 1

RNA extraction

RNA was extracted from approximately 20 mg of brain tissue. To this end, the material was frozen in liquid nitrogen, homogenized using the Mikro-Dismembrator S (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), and the homogenate was suspended in 2 ml Buffer AL (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) pre-heated to 56°C. The resulting suspension was mixed with 3 volumes of TRIzol LS Reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) and 0.2 volumes chloroform (Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) and after addition of 1 volume of 100% ethanol to the aqueous phase RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions including an on-column DNase I digestion. If necessary, extracted RNA was concentrated with Agencourt RNA Clean XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, USA). RNA quantity was determined using the Nanodrop ND1000 UV spectrophotometer (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany).

cDNA-synthesis, library preparation and sequencing

cDNA was generated from total RNA with the cDNA synthesis system kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and random hexamer primers (Roche) according to the Genome Sequencer RNA rapid library preparation manual (Roche). The resulting cDNA was fragmented to a target size of 300 bp using a Covaris M220 instrument (Covaris, Brighton, United Kingdom) and subsequently transformed to barcoded sequencing libraries using Illumina compatible adapters (Bioo Scientific Corp., Austin, USA) on a SPRI-TE library system (Beckman Coulter) with SPRIworks Fragment Library Cartridge II (Beckman Coulter) without size selection. After manual size selection with Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter) for a target peak size of 350 bp, library quality was assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 instrument (Agilent Technologies, Böblingen, Germany) with a High Sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent Technologies). Finally, the libraries were quantified with the KAPA Library Quantification Kit for Illumina (Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa) on a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA) and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq instrument with MiSeq reagent kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, USA) in 2 x 250 bp mode.

Sequence assembly

For sequence assembly, reads representing the respective sequences were selected by mapping the complete data set to reference sequences using the Genome Sequencer software suite (v2.6; Roche). Subsequently, the sorted reads were used for a de novo assembly using newbler (Roche) and the complete raw data sets were mapped along the resulting consensus sequences in order to identify potential sequencing errors. Thereafter, the sequences were visually inspected using Geneious (v6.1.7; Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand).

Sequencing protocol 2

RNA was extracted from approximately 100 mg of brain tissue using TRIzol reagent as per the supplier’s instructions (Life Technologies). A protocol for efficient RT-PCR amplification of the entire viral genome as a small number of overlapping amplicons was employed (Primers and protocols are available upon request). Amplicons derived from a single sample were pooled in equimolar concentrations and then used to generate a sequencing library using a Nextera XT kit as per the manufacturer’s directions (Illumina). Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Miseq instrument using a MiSeq reagent kit v2 in 2 x 250 bp mode. Sequence reads were assembled with the Lasergene software (v11; DNASTAR, Madison, Wisconsin USA). The paired end fastq files for each sample were assembled using a template-based method. Base coverage >200 was obtained throughout the genome with the exception of a small stretch of bases at the genomic termini for which coverage was very limited, regions which could not be unambiguously sequenced in any event due to their use as targets for amplification primers. As these regions tend to be highly conserved in all rabies viruses this was not considered to be a significant limitation. Complete assembled genomes were exported in fasta format for subsequent alignment and phylogenetic analysis as detailed below.

Sequencing protocol 3

RNA extraction, cDNA-synthesis, library preparation and sequencing

RNA from brain material stored at -80°C was prepared for Next Generation Sequencing on the MiSeq platform (Illumina). Briefly, TRIzol (Life Technologies) extracted viral RNA was depleted of host genomic DNA and rRNA as described previously [22]. Double stranded (ds) cDNA was synthesized from 50 ng RNA, using a random cDNA synthesis system (Roche), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The ds cDNA was purified using Ampure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter) and 1ng used for the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina). A sequencing library was prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq with 2 x 150 bp paired end reads following standard Illumina protocols. The total reads were mapped to an appropriate reference sequence in Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool (BWA, http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net) using a script to generate intermediate consensus sequences in which any indels relative to the original reference sequence were appropriately called, then visualized in Tablet [23] as described previously [24].

Sequence determination of arctic fox mitochondrial genes

For the determination of the genetic diversity of the reservoir host, mitochondrial (mtDNA) reference genes of arctic foxes, i.e. ATP6, ATP8, COX1, COX2, COX3, CYTB, ND1, ND2, ND3, ND4, ND4L and NDS [25] were selected from the International Nucleotide Sequence Database (INSDC) databases. Additionally, the mitochondrial D-Loop sequence as suggested before [26] was also used for mapping. Briefly, raw reads from sequencing were mapped along the reference genes and all reads identified as fox mitochondrial sequences were assembled de novo. Subsequently, the resulting consensus sequence was used as reference to map all reads of the dataset in order to identify potential sequencing errors. The resulting sequences were inspected visually in Geneious (v6.1.7; Biomatters).

Evolutionary analyses

All obtained complete RABV genome sequences were aligned using ClustalW [27] (http://www.clustal.org) as implemented in Geneious (Biomatters), the sequences were trimmed to equal length and labelled with the collection year. Subsequently, phylogenetic analyses were performed using the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation in the BEAST (Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis Sampling Trees) package v1.8.2 [28]. Selection of the evolutionary model using IQ-Tree (v1.1.0, [29] proposed use of the General Time Reversible model with rate heterogeneity (GTR + G). This model was used for MCMC simulation together with a relaxed molecular clock model and Bayesian Skyline population for 100,000,000 iterations, sampling every 10,000 states to give effective sample sizes. Maximum clade credibility trees (MCC) were annotated using TreeAnnotator (v1.8.2), 10% of the trees were removed as burn-in. The resulting final trees were visualized using FigTree (v1.4.2; http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). For phylogenetic analysis of the RABV Nucleoprotein (N) gene sequences, the dataset was extended with additional sequences from the INSDC databases (Table 2). All calculations were performed as described above for the full genome sequences except that for MCMC simulation the transitional model with rate heterogeneity (TIM + G) model was used.
Table 2

Details of additional sequences used for phylogenetic analyses of complete N gene.

Isolate name projectLocationYearHostINSDC accession no.References
AY352458.1-RUS.Chabarovsk-RD-1980Russia/Chabarovsk1980Raccon dogAY352458.1[60]
AY352459.1-RUS.Chita-SF-1977Southern Siberia1977Corsac foxAY352459.1[60]
AY352462.1-RUS.Norilsk-H-1998Russia/Norilsk1998Human (ex wolf)AY352462.1[60]
AY352474.1-RUS.Pskov-RF-1990Russia/Pskov1990Red foxAY352474.1[60]
AY352487.1-RUS-SA-1986Russia/Yakutia1986Arctic foxAY352487.1[60]
AY352491.1-KAZ-RF-1988Kazakhstan1988Red foxAY352491.1[60]
AY352498.1-USA-AK-D-1988Alaska1988DogAY352498.1[60]
AY352500.1-USA-AK-RF-1988Alaska1988Red foxAY352500.1[60]
AY730596.1-KOR-D-2004South Korea2004DogAY730596.1[61]
AY956319.1-IND-H-2004India2004HumanAY956319.1-
EF611828.1-RUS-SA-1987Russia/Yakutia1987Arctic foxEF611828.1[17]
EF611830.1-RUS-SA-1987Russia/Yakutia1987Arctic foxEF611830.1[17]
EF611843.1-USA-AK-RF-2007Alaska2007Red foxEF611843.1[17]
EF611848.1-USA-AK-RF-2008Alaska2008Red foxEF611848.1[17]
EF611851.1-USA-AK-AF-2006Alaska2006Arctic foxEF611851.1[17]
EF611853.1-USA-AK-D-2006Alaska2006DogEF611853.1[17]
EF611855.1-USA-AK-D-2006Alaska2006DogEF611855.1[17]
EF611868.1-SouthernSiberia-D-1980Southern Siberia1980DogEF611868.1[17]
JX944565.1-NPL-H-2003Nepal2003HumanJX944565.1[20]
JX944601.1-NPL-M-2010Nepal2010MongooseJX944601.1[20]
JX987745.1-GRL-D-1980Greenland1980DogJX987745.1[20]
L20675.2-CAN-ON-AF-1991Canada/Ontario1991Arctic foxL20675.2[62]
U03769.1-CAN.Arctic-D-1993Canada/Arctic1993DogU03769.1[63]
U03770.1-CAN.HudsonBay-D-1992Canada/Hudson Bay1992DogU03770.1[63]
U11735.1-CAN-ON-RF-1993Canada/Ontario1993Red foxU11735.1[63]
U22474.1-France-RF-1991France1991Red foxU22474.1[15]
U22477.1-MEX-D-1991Mexico1991DogU22477.1[15]
U22654.1-GRL-AF-1981Greenland1981Arctic foxU22654.1[15]
U42705.1-F.R.Yugoslavia-cattle-1981F.R.Yugoslavia1981CattleU42705.1-
U42432.1-EST-RD-1991Estonia1991Raccoon dogU43432.1-
From 55 of 58 Greenland samples, the substitutions per site and year were determined for the whole genome and all five protein coding nucleotide-sequences (N-, P-, M-, G- and L- Gene), respectively. Sequences were aligned and best fitting evolutionary models selected as described above. The best model for the N and P genes was Kimura 3-parameter (K81, [30], for the G and L genes Kimura 3-parameter with unequal frequencies (K81uf), for the M gene Kimura 2-parameter (K2P, [31], and for the whole genome Kimura 3-parameter with unequal frequencies and proportion of invariable sites (K81uf + I). Beast analysis was performed as described above except for the N gene for which 2,000,000,000 iterations and samples every 200,000 states were needed. To infer the evolutionary and phylogenetic relationships of foxes, the sequences were aligned using ClustalW and subsequently phylogenetic trees were calculated using the maximum likelihood (ML) method as implemented in MEGA (v5.2; [32]). For these calculations, the best fitting evolutionary model, Tamura and Nei 1993 with rate heterogeneity (TN93 + G), was selected using MEGA’s model test function and 1000 bootstrap replicates were calculated. The resulting phylogenetic trees were visualized in MEGA.

Geographical mapping

Approximate sampling locations in Greenland, Canada and the USA (Table 1, Fig 1) were visualized using ArcGis 10.0 (ESRI) at the highest spatial resolution available.
Fig 1

Map illustrating the origin of samples from Greenland, Canada and Alaska and their assignment to arctic lineages (Green = arctic lineage 1; Blue = 2; Red = 3; Yellow = 4).

Numbers in Greenland represent regions, while for Canada and Alaska postal abbreviation of the province/territory/states is indicated.

Map illustrating the origin of samples from Greenland, Canada and Alaska and their assignment to arctic lineages (Green = arctic lineage 1; Blue = 2; Red = 3; Yellow = 4).

Numbers in Greenland represent regions, while for Canada and Alaska postal abbreviation of the province/territory/states is indicated.

Results

To enable in-depth phylogenetic analysis, viral sequences encoding all genes were generated for all arctic RABV samples (S1 Table, Fig 1). For Greenland fox samples, complete coding sequences of 12 mitochondrial genes were determined from the available host sequence data in order to relate the viral phylogeny to fox populations and to detect potentially existing spatial fox distribution patterns.

Greenland RABV segregation into distinct arctic-3 subclades

To classify the sequenced viruses globally into pre-defined lineages, only complete N gene sequences (n = 109, Tables 1 and 2) were used, since to date no full-genome sequences are available for the Arctic rabies strains. All sequenced Greenland RABV (Table 1) clustered within the previously established circumpolar arctic-3 lineage (Fig 2). This lineage appears to be rather heterogeneous. Older arctic-3 viruses from Greenland (obtained in 1980/81) are clearly separated from recent Greenland RABVs.
Fig 2

Time resolved phylogenetic tree of the RABV complete N gene (maximum clade credibility (MCC) calculated with BEAST from a total of 109 RABV sequences (Tables 1 and 2).

RABV genetic lineages are labelled to pre-defined clusters according to a previous study [17].

Time resolved phylogenetic tree of the RABV complete N gene (maximum clade credibility (MCC) calculated with BEAST from a total of 109 RABV sequences (Tables 1 and 2).

RABV genetic lineages are labelled to pre-defined clusters according to a previous study [17]. For higher resolution of the heterogeneous arctic-3 lineage the analysis was repeated using full-genome sequences obtained for 79 RABV samples from Greenland, Canada, USA (Alaska) and Russia between 1977 and 2014 (Table 1). This high resolution analysis confirmed previous delineation of the arctic RABV strain into four major lineages (arctic 1–4, Figs 1 and 3), whereby RABV from Greenland exclusively grouped into arctic-3. Furthermore, it enabled the distinction of seven subclades and seven outliers (1977–2013) within arctic-3 (Fig 3), with the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the analyzed viruses (Fig 3) occurring approximately 82 years ago (95% HPD values, 73–92 years). The MRCA for the Greenland samples within this dataset dates back circa 35 years (95% HPD values, 32–37), whilst the divergence into subclades occurred between 15 years (subclade 3.VII; 95% HPD values, 14–17 years) and 6 years (subclade 3.IV; 95% HPD values, 5–8 years) ago.
Fig 3

Maximum clade credibility (MCC) phylogenetic tree using complete genome sequences from 79 RABV samples sequenced in this study (Table 1).

The minimum identity of sequences to be grouped into a single subclade within arctic lineage 3 was set to 99.5%.

Maximum clade credibility (MCC) phylogenetic tree using complete genome sequences from 79 RABV samples sequenced in this study (Table 1).

The minimum identity of sequences to be grouped into a single subclade within arctic lineage 3 was set to 99.5%. Of these seven subclades, only arctic-3.IV and 3.V contained viruses from both Greenland and Canada (2006 to 2014). Greenland RABV from arctic-3.IV -3.VI (n = 10) originated from north-western and western Greenland (regions 1–4, Fig 1), collected between 2005 and 2014. Greenland specific subclades 3.II, 3.III, and 3.VII consisted of 24 RABV from the western coastline (regions 2–6) obtained between 2001 and 2014. In contrast, all but one RABV within subclade 3.I (2005–2011) originated from southern Greenland (region 7), with Gra10.08-GRL-6-AF-2008 being the only exception collected in region 6 (Figs 1 and 3).

Partial sequencing overestimates substitution rates

Both the individual gene sequences and the full-genome alignment were used to estimate the mean nucleotide substitution rate utilizing BEAST [28]. For the N gene sequences (Tables 1 and 2, Fig 2) an estimate of 2.5 E-4 substitutions per site per year (95% high posterior density (HPD), 1.9 E-4–3.1 E-4) was obtained. When only N gene sequences from Greenland (N = 55) were considered, the estimate was 3.1 E-4 substitutions per site per year, a value in the range of previous studies. Among the different genes, lowest and highest substitution rates were observed in the L gene and the P gene, respectively (Table 3). The substitution rate of 2.5 E-4 per site per year (95% HPD values, 2.1 E-4–3.0 E-4) for the full genome sequence is similar to the value observed for the L gene.
Table 3

Comparison of substitution rates per site of RABVs.

ReferencesNumber of sequencesWhole genomeSubstitution per site (95% HPD)Comment
N -geneP—geneM- geneG—geneL—gene
This study552.53.1 E-46.0 E-44.4 E-43.3 E-42.4 E-4Whole genome sequences of this study (Greenland only)
(2.1 E-4–3.0 E-4)(1.8 E-4–4.4 E-4)(4.2 E-4–7.9 E-4)(2.7 E-4–6.4 E-4)(2.2–4.5 E-4)(1.9–2.9 E-4)
792.2 E-4Whole genome sequences of this study
(2.0 E-4–2.5 E-4)
1092.5 E-4N gene sequences (Fig 2)
(1.9 E-4–3.1 E-4)
[17]321.23 E-4Arctic/Arctic-like RABV
(6.8 E-5–1.83 E-4)
173.89 E-4European red fox
(5.1 E-5–6.7 E-4)
601.48 E-4Combination of arctic/arctic-like, European red fox and 11 further isolates
(8.1 E-5–2.23 E-4)
[64]764.6 E-4Chinese street RABV
(2.5 E-4–6.6 E-4)
[65]N = 1512.3 E-43.9 E-4Global genetic diversity of RABV for which the time(year) of sampling was available
G = 74(1.1 E-4–3.6 E-4)(1.2 E-4–6.5 E-4)
[20]673.8 E-4Arctic—related RABV
(2.3 E-4–5.4 E-4)
[66]N = 805.27 E-44.1 E-4N = 1350 bp
G = 71(± 0.23 E-4)(± 0.3 E-4)G = 690 bp
[18]2123.817 E-4Arctic RABV
(2.816 E-4–4.825 E-4)N = 500 bp

Greenland arctic foxes segregate into three major genetic clusters

Direct untargeted NGS determined by protocols 1 and 3 from original rabies positive brain samples from Greenland (n = 48) and Canada (n = 1) yielded a substantial amount of host sequences. This provided the unique opportunity to analyze the genetic structure of the arctic fox population. Analysis of 12 mitochondrial gene sequences revealed three major maternal lineages and additional outliers (Fig 4). Genetic identity within the main clusters was between 99.7% and 100% (Cluster 1), 99.8% and 100% (Cluster 2), and 99.9% (Cluster 3); while identity between clusters was between 99.4% and 99.6%. For all clusters there was a distinct, partly overlapping (cluster 1 and 2) geographical distribution. Twenty-one animals of cluster 1 were detected in North-western and Western Greenland (regions 1–6), while three foxes originated from the far distant Southern coast (region 7). Interestingly, a fox sample from the Northwestern Territories of Canada obtained in 1977 was almost identical with two foxes collected in 2007 in Western Greenland (Fig 1, Table 1). Half of the arctic foxes from cluster 2 (n = 19) originated from southern Greenland (region 7), while the remaining foxes were located in the western parts of the island (regions 2, 3, 5, and 6). The highly conserved cluster 3 comprised exclusively of arctic foxes from region 4, with samples from 12 years apart (Fig 4). The outliers originated from the western regions 2, 3, and 4 (Figs 1 and 4).
Fig 4

Phylogram of 49 arctic foxes generated from concatenated sequences of 12 mitochondrial protein coding sequences (ATP6, ATP8, COX1, COX2, COX3, CYTB, ND1, ND2, ND3, ND4, ND4L and NDS).

Bootstrap values higher than 40% are indicated. The minimum identity of sequences to be grouped into a fox cluster was set to 99.7%.

Phylogram of 49 arctic foxes generated from concatenated sequences of 12 mitochondrial protein coding sequences (ATP6, ATP8, COX1, COX2, COX3, CYTB, ND1, ND2, ND3, ND4, ND4L and NDS).

Bootstrap values higher than 40% are indicated. The minimum identity of sequences to be grouped into a fox cluster was set to 99.7%.

Occurrence of RABV variants in different fox clusters

Combinatorial analysis of RABV subclades, fox mitochondrial genes and the geographic origin revealed no association (Fig 5). The majority of samples were assigned to fox cluster 1 which was detected in all regions and comprised all RABV subclades. Fox cluster 2 was restricted mainly to the southern regions and therefore mostly infected with RABV subclades arctic 3.I and 3.II. Fox cluster 3 in contrast is only found in region 4, but represents 2 different RABV subclades (Figs 3 and 5).
Fig 5

Comparison of landscape genetics of Greenland arctic foxes (Figs 1 and 4) and their RABV subclades (Fig 3).

The size of circles represents the number of observations.

Comparison of landscape genetics of Greenland arctic foxes (Figs 1 and 4) and their RABV subclades (Fig 3).

The size of circles represents the number of observations.

Discussion

For a long time, there has been limited knowledge on the epidemiology of arctic rabies in Greenland [9-12]. It was only recently that the temporal occurrence, spatial distribution, and spread of arctic rabies in Greenland was investigated based on historical observations [13], however, this study did not provide any context to the RABV circulating on the island. While previous molecular epidemiological studies on RABV from Greenland using partial N gene sequences revealed that they belong to the arctic-3 lineage [16,17], unfortunately, the number of samples and the sequence length examined prevented further in-depth phylogenetic analyses. However, with the advent of NGS the determination of whole genome sequences for molecular epidemiological studies of RABV has become more efficient and comprehensive as illustrated recently for skunk variant of RABV from California [33]. Here, NGS derived sequence analysis is simultaneously applied to both arctic RABV strains and arctic fox genetics. A large number of RABV full genome sequences and mitochondrial genes were utilized for the phylogenetic analysis of arctic RABVs and their respective arctic fox host species. This dataset comprises a comprehensive number of RABV samples of the arctic strain (n = 79), particularly from Greenland (n = 55), thereby providing an improved knowledge of the molecular evolution of the circulating viruses and a more comprehensive understanding of the historical perspective of the disease across the Arctic. One limitation of this and previous studies is that collection of samples within Greenland, an island comprising 2.1 million km², relies on a passive surveillance system that results in uneven distribution of submissions, i.e. samples are only submitted from areas where close fox-human encounters are possible and there is a lack of samples from central and eastern parts of Greenland (Fig 1). For instance, in sparsely populated east Greenland only 12 cases have been observed since the late 1960s until 2014 [13], suggesting either low level of infection or underreporting [17,34]. Whilst in previous studies only selected RABV were considered [16-18], here nearly all viruses from rabies cases detected between 2005 and 2014 were included, together with selected samples from an earlier study [16] that were available for re-analysis using NGS. While in Alaska lineage 4, in Southern Canada lineage 1 and in Russia mainly RABV of arctic lineage 2 circulate, interestingly, both historic and recent RABV from Greenland exclusively fall within arctic-3 lineage (Fig 1). At present, based on our sample set of complete genome sequences, at least seven distinct subclades (arctic 3.I–3.VII) within this lineage have been circulating in Greenland (Fig 3). This delineation, however, contrasts results of a previous study, in which many of the Greenland samples (1990–2002) only clustered as one separate sub-group within arctic lineage 3 [18]. This can be explained by the limited length of the partial N gene sequence (500 bp) used which prevents a higher resolution of the tree. In fact, combining all previous partial N gene sequences (S2 Table) [16-18] with our dataset resulted in a rather limited alignment of 163 nucleotides in length which is too short to support phylogenetic analysis (S1 Fig). These limitations confound attempts to compare the studies and put them into a larger perspective, both temporally and spatially. Therefore, in this study this issue was addressed as best as possible by obtaining full length genome sequences from a subset of a previous study [16]. From a geographical perspective, the arctic-3 subclades defined here showed certain localized distributions (Fig 5). Considering the large home ranges of arctic foxes in connection with long distance migration of more than 1000 km [35-37], a larger geographical overlap would have been expected. However, this holds true only for subclade 3.II, the oldest cluster with viruses collected between 2002 and 2014. Phylogenetic analyses showed that all RABV from Greenland analyzed in this study have derived from Canadian incursions (Fig 3) with the oldest sample from 1977 having the most basal position in the tree. In contrast, an incursion and further spread of arctic RABV from Svalbard across the Greenland Sea into eastern and northeastern island as suggested previously [11] is not evident in this present study. In fact, Svalbard RABVs were shown to be more closely related to arctic RABVs from Russia [17,19]. The fact that subclades arctic-3.IV and 3.V are the only subclades to be identified on the North American mainland while all other subclades are restricted to Greenland’s western and southern parts, respectively, may represent evidence for a more recent exchange of viruses (Figs 1 and 3). In fact, these subclades 3.IV and 3.V were found in regions of Greenland where the distance to neighboring Ellesmere Island, Canada, is shortest. Here, pack ice that frequently bridges these two land masses may facilitate the spread of the disease [16,18]. Hence, the Smith Sound, the uninhabited sea passage between Greenland and Canada’s northernmost islands may play an important role in the exchange of arctic RABVs in this part of the Arctic [38]. This is supported by the close genetic relation between RABV Gra03.13-GRL-1-AF-2013 and 13N0473AFX-CAN-NU-AF-2013, with nearly identical genomes (single substitution), despite the fact that they are geographically separated by a distance of 750 km (Thule Air Base to Resolute Bay). In Greenland, viruses with a high nucleotide substitution rate may have evolved into younger subclades that have a narrower geographical distribution and are only identified on the island (Figs 3 and 5). For instance, arctic subclade 3.I is only found in the southern parts (Region 6,7; Fig 5). Interestingly, the most ancestral RABV still circulating (subclade arctic 3.II) has the widest geographic spread across the entire western part of Greenland. Such spread has also been demonstrated epidemiologically [13]. The dynamic observed here is further demonstrated by the observation that older subclades previously found in Greenland (Fig 2), [15-18] seem to have disappeared. It is interesting that arctic lineage 2 (Figs 1 and 3) had not (yet) been detected in Greenland, particularly considering that other arctic lineages appear to have spread [18]. As a case in point, one sample from 1990 from Grise Fjord, which has close proximity to Greenland, was arctic lineage 2, while a sample from the same place twenty-three years later was arctic 3 (Figs 1 and 3, Table 1). As regards the other arctic lineages, lineage 4 seems to be restricted to Alaska [18,39] (Fig 1), while circulation of arctic lineage 1 in Southern Ontario, Canada is highly restricted due to oral rabies vaccination [40,41]. The observed genetic dynamic within arctic RABVs is also demonstrated by the nucleotide substitution rates inferred from this dataset at the full genome level. Although in comparison with partial sequence analysis of other RABVs this appears low (Table 3), a substitution rate of 2.5 E-4 per site and year still indicates a substantial evolutionary dynamic. Discrepancies in the substitution rates and in the resulting MRCA as discussed before [18], are a result of the respective partial sequence used for calculation (Table 3). Thus, not all RABV genes are equal for evolutionary analyses, as previously suggested [42,43]. Taken together, use of complete genome sequences should result in a more accurate substitution rate, closely reflecting the actual virus evolution and genetic dynamic. The use of unbiased NGS offered the unique opportunity to simultaneously obtain reservoir host derived RNA sequences from the same sample for population analysis. Similar to previous studies [26,44] we initially used D-Loop sequences for this analysis. However, this did not allow a clear distinction because of the high genetic identities observed. Instead, for increased resolution, the 12 protein-coding mitochondrial genes enabled delineation of Greenland’s fox population into three main genetic clusters as shown recently [39]. Still, the high genetic identity both within and between the three main genetic fox clusters ranging between 99.4% and 100% may support assumptions that the genetic diversity of island arctic foxes compared to main land populations as a result of colonization is low [37,45]. The detection of three almost genetically identical arctic fox samples from the Northwestern Territories of Canada and Western Greenland (Fig 1) three decades apart may be evidence for high gene flow among arctic fox subpopulations, contributing to low genetic differentiation at least in the mitochondrial genome and further corroborate this hypothesis. In contrast, the results from this present study of mitochondrial gene analysis are in agreement with previous observations showing a fine-scale spatial population structure in Alaskan arctic foxes [39]. Future more detailed comparative haplotype analysis of arctic foxes including nuclear loci as well as fox genetic data from Canada’s northern territories and Alaska should corroborate this fact. While previously, mtDNA structure in arctic and red foxes from Alaska did not correspond to RABV variant structure in either species, microsatellite analyses identified 3 and 4 groups of arctic foxes, closely matching the distribution of rabies virus variants in the state [39]. Although the Greenland RABV arctic-3 subclades were not evenly distributed among the different mitochondrial fox clusters (Fig 5), these data provide no evidence for independent isolated evolutionary development of RABV in different arctic fox lineages but rather resemble geographic separation. In our study we focused on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) alone for characterization of the population genetics of arctic foxes. Analysis of mtDNA reveals a longer-term view of population structure than do fast evolving nuclear markers (e.g., microsatellites) and analysis of multiple mitochondrial genes, as in this study, yields finer resolution of relationship than studies focusing on a single gene. Nonetheless, any combination of mitochondrial genes is effectively considered a single locus. Recent studies included multiple markers of nuclear genes i.e. microsatellites to investigate host genetics in carnivores, sometimes resulting in conflicting results when compared to parallel investigated mtDNA [46-50]. However, a meta-analysis showed that mtDNA was robust in determining patterns of population history and yielded similar results to microsatellites [51]. Finally, the lack of a standardized approach for using both types of marker genes and the limited information on nuclear genes to those that are expressed as mRNA and are thus part of the dataset precluded further analyses. For instance, in a recent study the transcriptome was used for evolutionary studies of Arctic and red foxes [52]. While this information should be available it is unclear whether it would be sufficient for intra-species genetic studies.

Conclusion

By combining full length RABV genome sequence analysis and host derived sequences the interaction of viruses and their hosts was exemplarily demonstrated and may serve as a model approach for analysis of real-world understanding of infectious disease dynamics and virus-host interdependencies using a landscape genetics approach as suggested for dog mediated rabies [53]. In this study, although no interdependencies based on mtDNA were identified, nevertheless this approach led to a better understanding of the evolution, dynamics and geographical spread of arctic rabies in Greenland. A high degree of genetic identity both of RABVs and arctic foxes from Canada and Greenland suggests the movement of infected animals between the two landmasses. The overall diversity of arctic RABV in Greenland was very limited and only by analyzing the entire genome, a high resolution of the genetic evolution was possible, providing real-time insights into viral evolution. These results may be useful for future control strategies of arctic fox rabies. In contrast to previous statements [13], given the unique geographical location of Greenland, the expected reduction of connectivity by pack-ice due to climate change [54,55] and the geographic separation of individual host and virus genetic subclades despite long distance movement [36], the idea of arctic rabies control using oral rabies vaccination (ORV) in selected coastal areas appears feasible [56,57]. While preliminary field trials in Newfoundland (Canada) [58] and even northern Greenland [59] demonstrated in principle that ORV could be undertaken in remote northern regions, a targeted vaccination strategy would have to be developed before an elimination program could be implemented.

Overview of raw sequence data using NGS generated in this study.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Reference sequences used in S1 Fig.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Phylogram combining all previous partial N gene sequences (S2 Table) [16–18] with our dataset based on a rather limited alignment of 163 nucleotides in length.

(TIFF) Click here for additional data file.
  46 in total

1.  A phylogeny of the Caniformia (order Carnivora) based on 12 complete protein-coding mitochondrial genes.

Authors:  Isabelle Delisle; Curtis Strobeck
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Arctic and Arctic-like rabies viruses: distribution, phylogeny and evolutionary history.

Authors:  I V Kuzmin; G J Hughes; A D Botvinkin; S G Gribencha; C E Rupprecht
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Are all lyssavirus genes equal for phylogenetic analyses?

Authors:  Xianfu Wu; Richard Franka; Andres Velasco-Villa; Charles E Rupprecht
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.303

Review 4.  Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography.

Authors:  Robert M Zink; George F Barrowclough
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Pulses of movement across the sea ice: population connectivity and temporal genetic structure in the arctic fox.

Authors:  Karin Norén; Lindsey Carmichael; Eva Fuglei; Nina E Eide; Pall Hersteinsson; Anders Angerbjörn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A molecular phylogeny of the Canidae based on six nuclear loci.

Authors:  Carolyne Bardeleben; Rachael L Moore; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Genetic polymorphism in the rabies virus nucleoprotein gene.

Authors:  B Kissi; N Tordo; H Bourhy
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Phylogenetic comparison of rabies viruses from disease outbreaks on the Svalbard Islands.

Authors:  N Johnson; A Dicker; T Mork; D A Marston; A R Fooks; M Tryland; E Fuglei; T Müller
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.133

9.  Elimination of arctic variant rabies in red foxes, metropolitan Toronto.

Authors:  R C Rosatte; M J Power; D Donovan; J C Davies; M Allan; P Bachmann; B Stevenson; A Wandeler; F Muldoon
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 10.  Integrating the landscape epidemiology and genetics of RNA viruses: rabies in domestic dogs as a model.

Authors:  K Brunker; K Hampson; D L Horton; R Biek
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.234

View more
  16 in total

1.  Application of high-throughput sequencing to whole rabies viral genome characterisation and its use for phylogenetic re-evaluation of a raccoon strain incursion into the province of Ontario.

Authors:  Susan A Nadin-Davis; Adam Colville; Hannah Trewby; Roman Biek; Leslie Real
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.303

2.  Emergence and radiation of distemper viruses in terrestrial and marine mammals.

Authors:  Iben Stokholm; Wendy Puryear; Kaitlin Sawatzki; Steen Wilhelm Knudsen; Thilde Terkelsen; Paul Becher; Ursula Siebert; Morten Tange Olsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Defining objective clusters for rabies virus sequences using affinity propagation clustering.

Authors:  Susanne Fischer; Conrad M Freuling; Thomas Müller; Florian Pfaff; Ulrich Bodenhofer; Dirk Höper; Mareike Fischer; Denise A Marston; Anthony R Fooks; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Franz J Conraths; Timo Homeier-Bachmann
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-01-22

4.  The history of rabies in the Western Hemisphere.

Authors:  Andres Velasco-Villa; Matthew R Mauldin; Mang Shi; Luis E Escobar; Nadia F Gallardo-Romero; Inger Damon; Victoria A Olson; Daniel G Streicker; Ginny Emerson
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.970

Review 5.  Molecular Epidemiology and Evolution of European Bat Lyssavirus 2.

Authors:  Lorraine M McElhinney; Denise A Marston; Emma L Wise; Conrad M Freuling; Hervé Bourhy; Reto Zanoni; Torfinn Moldal; Engbert A Kooi; Antonie Neubauer-Juric; Tiina Nokireki; Thomas Müller; Anthony R Fooks
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Genetic analysis of a rabies virus host shift event reveals within-host viral dynamics in a new host.

Authors:  Denise A Marston; Daniel L Horton; Javier Nunez; Richard J Ellis; Richard J Orton; Nicholas Johnson; Ashley C Banyard; Lorraine M McElhinney; Conrad M Freuling; Müge Fırat; Nil Ünal; Thomas Müller; Xavier de Lamballerie; Anthony R Fooks
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  The phylodynamics of the rabies virus in the Russian Federation.

Authors:  Andrei A Deviatkin; Alexander N Lukashev; Elena M Poleshchuk; Vladimir G Dedkov; Sergey E Tkachev; Gennadiy N Sidorov; Galina G Karganova; Irina V Galkina; Mikhail Yu Shchelkanov; German A Shipulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of intra- and inter-host genetic diversity in rabies virus during experimental cross-species transmission.

Authors:  Emilie M Bonnaud; Cécile Troupin; Laurent Dacheux; Edward C Holmes; Elodie Monchatre-Leroy; Marion Tanguy; Christiane Bouchier; Florence Cliquet; Jacques Barrat; Hervé Bourhy
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  A Versatile Sample Processing Workflow for Metagenomic Pathogen Detection.

Authors:  Claudia Wylezich; Anna Papa; Martin Beer; Dirk Höper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Loeffler 4.0: Diagnostic Metagenomics.

Authors:  Dirk Höper; Claudia Wylezich; Martin Beer
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 9.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.