| Literature DB >> 27458833 |
Jacques Godfroid1, Kimberlee Beckmen2, Ingebjørg Helena Nymo1.
Abstract
In cases of chronic Brucella spp. infection, results of the rose bengal plate test (RBPT) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) should be coherent, as reported in controlled conditions in the literature. We compared RBPT and ELISA results in 58 Alaska grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos horribilis), eight Kodiak brown bears ( Ursus arctos middendorffi), and six Alaska Peninsula brown bears ( Ursus arctos gyas). Of the 72 bears tested, 42 (58%) were ELISA positive and 53 (73%) were RBPT positive. However, the coherence between the tests was only fair (K=0.37, SE=0.11), suggesting that either the serologic results were not compatible with Brucella spp. infection or that there was a technical problem with the tests. To address a potential technical problem, we performed a 30-min chloroform/centrifugation cleanup. Following cleanup, the ELISA identified 43 positives (59%) and the RBPT identified 47 (65%), and the coherence between the tests was much improved (K=0.80, SE=0.07). We recommend cleaning wildlife sera with a high lipid content before performing RBPT and performing RBPT and ELISA in parallel to assess coherence. Our results suggest that Alaskan brown bears have been exposed to Brucella spp.Entities:
Keywords: Alaska Peninsula brown bear; Alaska grizzly bear; Brucella spp.; Kodiak brown bear; bear; brucellosis; lipemic serum; serum cleanup
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27458833 DOI: 10.7589/2015-11-298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Wildl Dis ISSN: 0090-3558 Impact factor: 1.535