| Literature DB >> 27458467 |
Haibin Wu1, Xiaoli He2, Hao Gong2, Shaobo Luo1, Mingzhu Li2, Junqiu Chen2, Changyuan Zhang2, Ting Yu3, Wangping Huang2, Jianning Luo2.
Abstract
The hybrids between Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb. and L.cylindrica (L.) Roem. have strong heterosis effects. However, some reproductive isolation traits hindered their normal hybridization and fructification, which was mainly caused by the flowering time and hybrid pollen sterility. In order to study the genetic basis of two interspecific reproductive isolation traits, we constructed a genetic linkage map using an F2 population derived from a cross between S1174 [L. acutangula (L.) Roxb.] and 93075 [L. cylindrica (L.) Roem.]. The map spans 1436.12 CentiMorgans (cM), with an average of 8.11 cM among markers, and consists of 177 EST-SSR markers distributed in 14 linkage groups (LG) with an average of 102.58 cM per LG. Meanwhile, we conducted colinearity analysis between the sequences of EST-SSR markers and the genomic sequences of cucumber, melon and watermelon. On the basis of genetic linkage map, we conducted QTL mapping of two reproductive isolation traits in sponge gourd, which were the flowering time and hybrid male sterility. Two putative QTLs associated with flowering time (FT) were both detected on LG 1. The accumulated contribution of these two QTLs explained 38.07% of the total phenotypic variance (PV), and each QTL explained 15.36 and 22.71% of the PV respectively. Four QTLs for pollen fertility (PF) were identified on LG 1 (qPF1.1 and qPF1.2), LG 3 (qPF3) and LG 7 (qPF7), respectively. The percentage of PF explained by these QTLs varied from 2.91 to 16.79%, and all together the four QTLs accounted for 39.98% of the total PV. Our newly developed EST-SSR markers and linkage map are very useful for gene mapping, comparative genomics and molecular marker-assisted breeding. These QTLs for interspecific reproductive isolation will also contribute to the cloning of genes relating to interspecific reproductive isolation and the utilization of interspecific heterosis in sponge gourd in further studies.Entities:
Keywords: EST-SSR marker; QTL mapping; flowering time; genetic linkage map; pollen fertility; sponge gourd
Year: 2016 PMID: 27458467 PMCID: PMC4935800 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Characteristics of synthesized EST–SSRs and efficiency of marker development.
| Di-nucleotide | 80 | 70 (87.50%) | 41(58.57%) | 17(41.46%) | 24(58.54%) |
| Tri-nucleotide | 81 | 63 (77.78%) | 33(52.38%) | 14(42.42%) | 19(57.58%) |
| Tetra-nucleotide | 60 | 48 (80.00%) | 28(58.33%) | 14(50.00%) | 14(50.00%) |
| Penta-nucleotide | 62 | 50 (80.65%) | 39(78.00%) | 21(53.85%) | 18(46.15%) |
| Hexa-nucleotide | 62 | 51 (82.26%) | 42(82.35%) | 23(54.76%) | 19(45.24%) |
| Compound | 60 | 43 (71.67%) | 33(76.74%) | 12(36.36%) | 21(63.64%) |
| Total | 405 | 325 (80.25%) | 216(66.46%) | 101(46.76%) | 115(53.24%) |
Percentage of successfully amplified EST–SSRs per synthesized primer pair.
Percentage of polymorphic markers per amplified primer pair.
Percentage of co-dominant markers per polymorphic primer pair.
Percentage of dominant markers per polymorphic primer pair.
Distribution of molecular markers among 14 linkage group (LGs) established on a genetic map using an F2 population derived from the cross S1174 × P93075.
| LG 1 | 237.61 | 49 | 4.85 |
| LG 2 | 182.07 | 14 | 14.01 |
| LG 3 | 181.27 | 16 | 12.081 |
| LG 4 | 187.61 | 17 | 11.73 |
| LG 5 | 69.14 | 11 | 6.91 |
| LG 6 | 0.62 | 2 | 0.62 |
| LG 7 | 140.83 | 13 | 11.73 |
| LG 8 | 94.44 | 12 | 8.59 |
| LG 9 | 120.24 | 19 | 6.68 |
| LG 10 | 136.89 | 14 | 9.78 |
| LG 11 | 38.89 | 4 | 9.72 |
| LG 12 | 24.3 | 2 | 24.3 |
| LG 13 | 7.61 | 2 | 7.61 |
| LG 14 | 14.6 | 2 | 14.6 |
| Total | 1436.12 | 177 | 8.11 |
Figure 1The 14 linkage groups (LG 1-LG 14) of sponge gourd base on the F2 population derived from the cross S1174 × P93075. The EST-SSR markers were shown on the right of the LG, and distances among markers were indicated in cM on the left. The QTLs for flowering time (qFT) were mapped to LG 1. The QTLs for pollen fertility (qPF) were mapped to LG 1, LG 3 and LG 7.
Figure 2Circos illustration of the colinearity analysis between the sequences of sponge gourd EST-SSR markers and the genomic sequences of cucumber, melon and watermelon. (A) The PCR-amplified target fragments of sponge gourd EST-SSR markers–cucumber genome. (B) The Unigenes where sponge gourd EST-SSR markers located—cucumber genome. (C) The PCR-amplified target fragments of sponge gourd EST-SSR markers—melon genome. (D) The Unigenes where sponge gourd EST-SSR markers located—melon genome. (E) The PCR-amplified target fragments of sponge gourd EST-SSR markers—watermelon genome. (F) The Unigenes where sponge gourd EST-SSR markers located—watermelon genome. The sponge gourd linkage groups are denoted as LaLGs and the pseudomolecules of cucumber, watermelon and melon are represented as CsChrs, ClChrs, and CmChrs, respectively.
Flowering time (FT) and pollen fertility (PF) of parental lines S1174, P93075, F1 hybrids, and F2 population derived from the cross S1174 × P93075.
| FT (h) | −6.5 (17:30) | 5.03 (5:02) | −1.45 (22:34) | −6.05 (17:57) | 5.08 (5:05) | −1.27 ± 2.41 | 0.17 | −0.39 |
| PF (%) | 94.31 | 95.54 | 44.71 | 0 | 100 | 42.83 ± 28.35 | −0.07 | −1.05 |
The mean value of the results of the three measurements.
Decimal time measured in hour which is transformed in the way used in “Materials and Methods”; standard time in brackets.
Figure 3Distribution of flowering time (A) and pollen fertility (B) in F2 population derived from the cross S1174 × P93075.
Figure 4Pollen phenotypes of S1174 (A), P93075 (C), F1 (B), and F2 plants (D–F). Three male flowers with three fields of vision were analyzed and the fertile pollen rate in each field was calculated, taking their average value as the fertile pollen rate of single plant. Bars = 200 μm.
Summary of QTLs for flowering time (FT) and pollen fertility (PF) using composite interval mapping in F2 population derived from the cross S1174 × P93075.
| FT | 1 | SGF385-SGA10 | 79.90 | 6.88 | −1.73 | 0.12 | 22.71 | −0.07 | A | |
| 1 | SGB157-SGA23 | 191.50 | 3.40 | −0.81 | 1.47 | 15.36 | −1.81 | OD | ||
| PF | 1 | SGJ823-SGD255 | 101.50 | 5.01 | 0.99 | −20.85 | 9.12 | −21.06 | OD | |
| 1 | SGJ714-SGF392 | 117.10 | 3.85 | −11.48 | −17.91 | 2.91 | 1.56 | OD | ||
| 3 | SGJ745-SGB134 | 42.40 | 3.01 | −6.75 | 15.83 | 11.16 | −2.34 | OD | ||
| 7 | SGK891-SGK857 | 99.70 | 3.65 | 10.18 | −13.04 | 16.79 | −1.28 | OD |
Individual QTLs are shown with the italic abbreviation of the trait and the linkage group number.
The marker interval to the putative QTL is shown in bold in Figure .
Positive or negative value indicates that the allele from S1174 or P93075 increases the phenotypic value, respectively.
Positive or negative value indicates the effect increasing or decreasing trait value over the population mean.
Percentage of the total phenotypic variation explained by the QTL.
D/A Dominance/Additive.
GA gene action modes classified as A additive (|d/a| = 0–0.2), PD partial dominance (|d/a| = 0.21–0.80), D dominance (|d/a| = 0.81–1.20), and OD overdominance (|d/a| > 1.2).