Literature DB >> 27458229

Comparative Population Plasma and Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Micafungin in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Burn Injuries and Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection.

A García-de-Lorenzo1, S Luque2, S Grau3, A Agrifoglio1, L Cachafeiro1, E Herrero1, M J Asensio1, S M Sánchez1, J A Roberts4.   

Abstract

Severely burned patients have altered drug pharmacokinetics (PKs), but it is unclear how different they are from those in other critically ill patient groups. The aim of the present study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in the plasma and burn eschar of severely burned patients with those of micafungin in the plasma and peritoneal fluid of postsurgical critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection. Fifteen burn patients were compared with 10 patients with intra-abdominal infection; all patients were treated with 100 to 150 mg/day of micafungin. Micafungin concentrations in serial blood, peritoneal fluid, and burn tissue samples were determined and were subjected to a population pharmacokinetic analysis. The probability of target attainment was calculated using area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h/MIC cutoffs of 285 for Candida parapsilosis and 3,000 for non-parapsilosis Candida spp. by Monte Carlo simulations. Twenty-five patients (18 males; median age, 50 years; age range, 38 to 67 years; median total body surface area burned, 50%; range of total body surface area burned, 35 to 65%) were included. A three-compartment model described the data, and only the rate constant for the drug distribution from the tissue fluid to the central compartment was statistically significantly different between the burn and intra-abdominal infection patients (0.47 ± 0.47 versus 0.15 ± 0.06 h(-1), respectively; P < 0.05). Most patients would achieve plasma PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of 90% for non-parapsilosis Candida spp. and C. parapsilosis with MICs of 0.008 and 0.064 mg/liter, respectively, for doses of 100 mg daily and 150 mg daily. The PKs of micafungin were not significantly different between burn patients and intra-abdominal infection patients. After the first dose, micafungin at 100 mg/day achieved the PK/PD targets in plasma for MIC values of ≤0.008 mg/liter and ≤0.064 mg/liter for non-parapsilosis Candida spp. and Candida parapsilosis species, respectively.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27458229      PMCID: PMC5038299          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00727-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  31 in total

1.  Fluconazole use in burns patients.

Authors:  S Rayatt; M Wienbren; J Clarke
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 2.  Recognition and prevention of nosocomial invasive fungal infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jeannina A Smith; Carol A Kauffman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Micafungin at a standard dosage of 100 mg/day achieves adequate plasma exposure in critically ill patients with severe burn injuries.

Authors:  M J Asensio; M Sánchez; B Galván; E Herrero; L Cachafeiro; A Agrifoglio; E Perales; S Luque; A García-de-Lorenzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Micafungin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic adequacy for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration.

Authors:  Emilio Maseda; Santiago Grau; Maria-Jose Villagran; Carmen Hernandez-Gancedo; Araceli Lopez-Tofiño; Jason A Roberts; Lorenzo Aguilar; Sonia Luque; David Sevillano; Maria-Jose Gimenez; Fernando Gilsanz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Characteristics of bloodstream infections in burn patients: An 11-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Bhavik M Patel; Jennifer D Paratz; Anthony Mallet; Jeffrey Lipman; Michael Rudd; Michael J Muller; David L Paterson; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  Update on the critical care management of severe burns.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Amy T Makley; Richard J Kagan
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.510

7.  Epidemiological and clinico-mycological profile of fungal wound infection from largest burn centre in Asia.

Authors:  Malini R Capoor; Sonal Gupta; Sujata Sarabahi; Anshumali Mishra; Vinay Kumar Tiwari; Pushpa Aggarwal
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 4.377

8.  Use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses to optimize therapy with the systemic antifungal micafungin for invasive candidiasis or candidemia.

Authors:  David Andes; Paul G Ambrose; Jeffrey P Hammel; Scott A Van Wart; Varsha Iyer; Daniel K Reynolds; Donald N Buell; Laura L Kovanda; Sujata M Bhavnani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in burn patients.

Authors:  M J Weinbren
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Two general methods for population pharmacokinetic modeling: non-parametric adaptive grid and non-parametric Bayesian.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatarinova; Michael Neely; Jay Bartroff; Michael van Guilder; Walter Yamada; David Bayard; Roger Jelliffe; Robert Leary; Alyona Chubatiuk; Alan Schumitzky
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.745

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics of antifungal drugs: practical implications for optimized treatment of patients.

Authors:  Romuald Bellmann; Piotr Smuszkiewicz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Prospective Cohort Study of Micafungin Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Plasma and Peritoneal Fluid in Septic Patients with Intra-abdominal Infections.

Authors:  Nicolas Garbez; Litaty Mbatchi; Steven C Wallis; Laurent Muller; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Claire Roger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Population Pharmacokinetic Model and Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment of Micafungin in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Lisa C Martial; Rob Ter Heine; Jeroen A Schouten; Nicole G Hunfeld; Henk J van Leeuwen; Paul E Verweij; Dylan W de Lange; Peter Pickkers; Roger J Brüggemann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Micafungin.

Authors:  Roeland E Wasmann; Eline W Muilwijk; David M Burger; Paul E Verweij; Catherijne A Knibbe; Roger J Brüggemann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Are we near to the end of the standard dose of micafungin?

Authors:  Alexander Agrifoglio; Lucía Cachafeiro; Eva Herrero; Manuel Sánchez; Abelardo García de Lorenzo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Efficacy of humanized single large doses of caspofungin on the lethality and fungal tissue burden in a deeply neutropenic murine model against Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.

Authors:  Eszter Prépost; Zoltán Tóth; David S Perlin; Rudolf Gesztelyi; Gábor Kardos; Renátó Kovács; Fruzsina Nagy; Lajos Forgács; László Majoros
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Penetration of echinocandins into wound secretion of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Tiziana Gasperetti; René Welte; Herbert Oberacher; Jana Marx; Ingo Lorenz; Peter Schellongowski; Thomas Staudinger; Karin Burgmann; Philipp Eller; Tobias Santner; Andrea Griesmacher; Hartwig Pfisterer; Stephan Eschertzhuber; Maria Aigner; Michael Joannidis; Romuald Bellmann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.553

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.