Literature DB >> 27458158

Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TSPYL6 gene and breast cancer susceptibility in the Han Chinese population.

Ming Liu1,2,3, Bin Li1,2, Wen Guo4, Xiyang Zhang1,2, Zhengshuai Chen1,2, Jingjie Li1,2, Mengdan Yan1,2, Chao Chen1,2, Tianbo Jin1,2.   

Abstract

We investigated the associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the testis-specific Y-encoded-like protein 6 (TSPYL6) gene and breast cancer (BC) susceptibility in the Han Chinese population. A total of 183 BC patients and 195 healthy women were included in the study. Six SNPs in TSPYL6 were genotyped and the association with BC risk analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify SNPs that correlated with BC susceptibility. Rs11896604 was associated with a decreased risk of BC based on dominant and genotype models. Rs843706 was associated with an increased risk of BC based on a recessive model. Rs11125529 was associated with decreased BC susceptibility based on a genotype model. Finally, rs843711 inversely correlated with clinical stage III/IV BC. Our findings reveal a significant association between SNPs in the TSPYL6 gene and BC risk in a Han Chinese population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TSPYL6; association study; breast cancer; single nucleotide polymorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27458158      PMCID: PMC5342380          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths among women worldwide (particularly in less developed regions including East Asian countries, which accounted for 324,000 deaths or 14.3% of the total) [1]. According to GLOBOCAN 2012, 187,213 individuals were diagnosed with BC in China in 2012, and 47,984 of these individuals died of the disease [2]. BC is a multifactorial disease that has been associated with various factors including age, gender, ethnicity, family history, personal history, lifestyle, as well as both hormonal and non-hormonal risk factors [3]. Hereditary BC clusters in families and is typically diagnosed at an earlier age [4]. Studies of twins have indicated that the risk of BC is higher for a monozygotic twin of a co-twin, suggesting that genetic factors play an important role in BC development [5]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) also play an important role in the genetic susceptibility to BC. Many genes have been associated with a moderate or high lifetime risk of BC including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2. In addition, common variants at more than 70 loci have been identified through GWAS and large-scale replication studies [6-9]. The testis-specific Y-encoded-like protein 6 (TSPYL6) gene, located on human chromosome 2p16.2, is a member of the TSPY/TSPYL/SET/NAP-1 (TTSN) superfamily that includes TSPYL1, TSPYL2, TSPYL3, TSPYL4, and TSPYL5 [10]. Upregulation of TSPYL6 has been observed in both benign and malignant cells. The TSPYL6 protein has been associated with chromatin and nucleosome assembly [11]. However, the specific functions of TSPYL6 are not yet clear. Norling et al. [12] sequenced the TSPYL6 gene in an entire Sweden patient cohort, but no inactivating mutations were identified. Additionally, no studies have investigated correlations between the TSPYL6 gene and BC susceptibility. In this case-control study, we genotyped six SNPs in TSPYL6: rs843645, rs11125529, rs12615793, rs843711, rs11896604, and rs843706 and performed a comprehensive association analysis to identify SNPs associated with BC risk in Han Chinese women.

RESULTS

Participant characteristics

A total of 183 patients with BC and 195 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. The participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. No significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), or the menopause age were observed between patients in the case and control groups (p > 0.05). The mean age of the participants was 45.35 years in the control group and 46.40 years in the case group. The mean BMI was 22.53 in the control group and 23.08 in the case group.
Table 1

Basic characteristics of the control individuals and patients with breast cancer

CharacteristicCases (N = 183)Controls (N = 195)P -value
 Mean age ± SD46.40 ± 9.383 (N= 183)45.35 ± 6.899 (N= 195)0.218a
 Mean BMI ± SD23.08 ± 3.00 (N= 183)22.53 ± 2.55 (N = 195)0.056a
MenopausePremenopausal115 (62.8%)119 (61.0%)0.716b
Postmenopausal68 (37.2%)76 (39.0%)
Age of Menarche≤ 1225 (13.7%)
> 12158 (86.3%)
Breastfeeding Duration≤ 612 (6.5%)
> 6158 (93.5%)
Clinical StagesI/II135 (73.8%)
III/IV48 (26.2%)
Estrogen Receptornegative60 (32.8%)
positive123 (67.2%)
Family Tumor Historyno156 (85.2%)
yes27 (14.8%)
Incipientw or RecurrenceIncipient109 (59.9%)
Recurrence73 (40.1%)
Lymph node metastasisno105 (58.3%)
yes75 (41.7%)
Menopauseno115 (62.8%)
yes68 (37.2%)
Primiparous Age< 30170 (96.6%)
≥ 306 (3.4%)
Procreative Times< 1142 (81.1%)
≥ 133 (18.9%)
Progestrone Receptornegative75 (41.0%)
positive108 (59.0%)
Tumor Locationleft84 (45.9%)
right97 (53.0%)
both2 (1.1%)
Tumor Size (cm)≤ 394 (51.4%)
> 389 (48.6%)
Tumor Typecarcinoma165 (90.2%)
others18 (9.8%)
Whether fertilityno7 (3.8%)
yes176 (96.2%)

SD: Standard deviation. BMI: Body mass index (weight [kg]/height[m]2).

P value was calculated by Welch's t test.

P value was calculated by Pearson's χ2 test.

SD: Standard deviation. BMI: Body mass index (weight [kg]/height[m]2). P value was calculated by Welch's t test. P value was calculated by Pearson's χ2 test.

Association between TSPYL6 polymorphisms and BC risk

Detailed SNP data and the associations between various SNPs and BC risk are shown in Table 2. Our data indicated that all 6 SNPs investigated were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control subjects (p > 0.05). No associations were observed between the alleles and BC risk in an allele model. We also performed a Bonferroni correction and determined that none of the SNPs showed statistical significant associations with BC risk.
Table 2

Basic information of candidate SNPs in this study

SNPsPositionBandAllelesA/BMAF-controlMAF-caseHWE-pOR95% CIp-x2
rs843645544746642p16.2G/T0.2970.2790.49680.9130.666–1.2510.57
rs11125529544758662p16.2A/C0.1950.1500.16950.7310.499–1.0690.105
rs12615793544759142p16.2A/G0.2010.1610.11660.7640.525–1.1090.156
rs843711544791172p16.2C/T0.4870.5440.15311.2540.942–1.6690.12
rs11896604544791992p16.2G/C0.2210.1670.09290.7070.491–1.0180.062
rs843706544803692p16.2C/A0.4820.5440.061031.2810.962–1.7050.090

SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; MAF: Minor allele frequency; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

Minor alleles.

Major alleles.

SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; MAF: Minor allele frequency; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval. Minor alleles. Major alleles. We further assessed the association between each SNP and BC risk in an unconditional logistic regression analysis, which was performed using four models: additive, dominant, recessive, and genotype model (Tables 3 and 4). Rs11896604 was associated with a decreased risk of BC in a dominant model (odds ratio [OR] = 0.623, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.405–0.958, p = 0.031). Rs843706 was associated with an increased risk of BC under the recessive model (OR = 1.709, 95% CI = 1.055–2.770, p = 0.030) (Table 3). Rs11125529 was associated with a decreased risk of BC under the genotype model (OR = 0.612, 95% CI = 0.391–0.959, p = 0.032) (Table 4). Rs11896604 was associated with a decreased risk of BC in a genotype model (OR = 0.574, 95% CI = 0.370–0.891, p = 0.013). No statistical associations were detected under the other models. In addition, no positive results were observed after Bonferroni correction.
Table 3

Single loci association with breast cancer risk (adjusted by age, BMI and menopause)

SNPModelGenotypeCasesControlsOR (95% CI)P
rs843645Dominant modelT/T999410.246
G/G-G/T841010.785 (0.521–1.182)
Recessive modelT/T-T/G16518010.535
G/G18151.259 (0.608–2.606)
Additive model---0.904 (0.658–1.241)0.532
rs11125529Dominant modelC/C13312310.057
A/A-A/C50720.652 (0.419–1.013)
Recessive modelC/C-C/A17819110.618
A/A541.413 (0.364–5.488)
Additive model---0.730 (0.491–1.085)0.120
rs12615793Dominant modelG/G12912010.085
A/A-A/G54740.682 (0.441–1.054)
Recessive modelG/G-G/A17819010.625
A/A541.402 (0.361–5.445)
Additive model---0.755 (0.510–1.117)0.159
rs843711Dominant modelT/T394610.532
C/C-C/T1441491.169 (0.405–0.958)
Recessive modelT/T-T/C12815410.066
C/C55411.563 (0.972–2.515)
Additive model---1.261 (0.937–1.700)0.126
rs11896604Dominant modelC/C12811410.031
G/G-G/C55810.623 (0.405–0.958)
Recessive modelC/C-C/G17719010.644
G/G651.336 (0.391–4.564)
Additive model---0.709 (0.484–1.039)0.078
rs843706Dominant modelA/A394510.603
C/C-C/A1441491.140 (0.696–1.866)
Recessive modelA/A-A/C12815610.030
C/C55381.709 (1.055–2.770)
Additive model---1.294 (0.958–1.750)0.093

SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR: Odds ratio. CI: Confidence interval.

P value was calculated by Wald test. *p < 0.05 indicates statistical significant.

Table 4

The association between the single-nucleotide polymorphisms and BC risk in Genotype model (adjusted by age, BMI and menopause)

GenotypeCasesControlsOR (95% CI)P
rs843645
 TT99941.00 [Ref]
 GT66860.729 (0.475–1.117)0.147
 GG18151.139 (0.543–2.391)0.730
rs11125529
 CC1331231.00 [Ref]
 AC45680.612 (0.391–0.959)0.032
 AA541.156 (0.304–4.404)0.832
rs12615793
 GG1291201.00 [Ref]
 AG49700.651 (0.419–1.013)0.057
 AA541.163 (0.305–4.432)0.825
rs843711
 TT39461.00 [Ref]
 CT891080.972 (0.583–1.620)0.913
 CC55411.582 (0.879–2.848)0.126
rs11896604
 CC1281141.00 [Ref]
 GC49760.574 (0.37–0.891)0.013
 GG651.069 (0.318–3.596)0.915
rs843706
 AA39451.00 [Ref]
 CA891110.925 (0.555–1.543)0.766
 CC55381.670 (0.921–3.030)0.092

OR: odd ratio; CI: confidence interval;

p value was calculated by Wald test. *p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR: Odds ratio. CI: Confidence interval. P value was calculated by Wald test. *p < 0.05 indicates statistical significant. OR: odd ratio; CI: confidence interval; p value was calculated by Wald test. *p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. In order to assess the associations between SNP haplotypes and BC risk, a Wald test was performed using an unconditional multivariate regression analysis. However, no positive results were observed (Table 5, Figure 1).
Table 5

Haplotype frequency and their association with BC risk in case and control subjects (adjusted by age, BMI and menopause)

SNPsHaplotypeFreq %P1OR95% CIP2
casecontrol
rs843645|rs11125529|rs12615793|rs843711|rs11896604|rs843706TAATGA0.1500.1920.1260.7450.5011.1080.146
TCGTGA0.0160.0230.5100.7410.2562.1490.581
GCGTCA0.2760.2920.6190.9120.6621.2570.574
TCGCCC0.5300.4740.1261.2660.9391.7070.122

*P-value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

P1- values were calculated from two-sided Chi-squared test.

P2 -values were calculated by unconditional logistic regression.

The reference standard for each haplotype is the other haplotype.

Figure 1

Haplotype block map for all the SNPs of the TSPYL6 gene

*P-value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. P1- values were calculated from two-sided Chi-squared test. P2 -values were calculated by unconditional logistic regression. The reference standard for each haplotype is the other haplotype.

Association between TSPYL6 polymorphisms and BC patient clinicopathological features

We next analyzed the association between TSPYL6 polymorphisms and BC patient clinicopathological features, which included age, age of menarche, BMI, breastfeeding duration, clinical stage, estrogen receptor status, family history of cancer, procreative time, progesterone receptor status, tumor location, tumor size (cm), tumor type, incipient recurrence, presence of lymph node metastasis, age of menopause, and prim parous age. Positive results are shown in (Table 6A, 6B). For rs11125529, we found that more recurrent BC patients had the AA + CA genotype than the CC genotype (OR = 2.321, 95% CI = 1.192–4.521, p = 0.012) (Table 6A). For rs843711, the CT + CC genotype was observed less frequently in patients with clinical stage III/IV disease (OR = 0.411, 95% CI = 0.194–0.869, p = 0.018) and in patients with recurrent BC (OR = 0.458, 95% CI = 0.222–0.944, p = 0.032) than the TT genotype (Table 6A). Our results suggested that the frequency of recurrent BC patients with the CC genotype of rs11896604 was higher than the frequency of patients with the GG + CG genotype (OR = 2.471, 95% CI = 1.290–4.734, p = 0.006) (Table 6B). Finally, the CA + CC genotype of rs843706 was more frequently observed in patients with clinical stage III/IV disease (OR = 0.411, 95% CI = 0.194–0.869, p = 0.018) and in patients with recurrent BC (OR = 0.458, 95% CI = 0.222–0.944, p = 0.032) than the AA genotype (Table 6B). No statistical associations were detected between the other loci and the clinical parameters that were investigated.
Table 6A

The Associations between TSPYL6 polymorphisms and clinical characteristics of breast cancer patients

Variablesrs11125529rs843711
AA + CACCORa95% CIPbCT+CCTTORa95% CIPb
Age5013314439
 ≤ 4014431(reference)41161(reference)
 > 4036901.229(0.600–2.515)0.573103231.748(0.839–3.639)0.133
Age of Menarche5013314439
 ≤ 125201(reference)2231(reference)
 > 12451130.628(0.222–1.775)0.377122362.164(0.612–7.646)0.221
BMI5013314439
 ≤ 2434871(reference)98231(reference)
 > 2416460.89(0.445–1.780)0.74246160.675(0.326–1.397)0.288
Breastfeeding Duration4612413337
 ≤ 6391(reference)1021(reference)
 > 6431150.891(0.230–3.448)0.868123351.423(0.298–6.797)0.657
Clinical Stages5013314439
 I/II38971(reference)112231(reference)
 III/IV12360.851(0.401–1.807)0.67432160.411(0.194–0.869)0.018*
Estrogen Receptor5013314439
 negative17431(reference)49111(reference)
 positive33900.927(0.466–1.847)0.8395280.762(0.350–1.658)0.492
Family Tumor History5013314439
 no81141(reference)121351(reference)
 yes42191.143(0.465–2.807)0.7712341.663(0.539–5.031)0.372
Procreative Times4712813837
 < 1371051(reference)112301(reference)
 ≥ 110230.81(0.353–1.862)0.622671.005(0.398–2.539)0.991
Progestrone Receptor5013314439
 negative22531(reference)59161(reference)
 positive28800.843(0.437–1.627)0.61185231.002(0.488–2.058)0.995
Tumor Location5013314439
 left22621(reference)66181(reference)
 right28691(reference)77201(reference)
 both02------0.63111------0.603
Tumor Size (cm)5013314439
 ≤ 324701(reference)76181(reference)
 > 326631.204(0.628–2.308)0.57668210.767(0.377–1.559)0.463
Tumor Type5013314439
 Infiltrating ductal carcinoma471181(reference)128371(reference)
 others3151.992(0.551–7.198)0.2851620.432(0.095–1.967)0.266
Incipience/Recurrence4913314438
 Incipience22871(reference)92171(reference)
 Recurrence27462.321(1.192–4.521)0.012*52210.458(0.222–0.944)0.032*
Lymph node metastasis4913114139
 no29761(reference)83171(reference)
 yes20550.953(0.489–1.857)0.88758220.904(0.442–1.851)0.783
Menopause5013314439
 no27881(reference)87281(reference)
 yes23451.666(0.859–3.230)0.12957111.668(0.770–3.614)0.192
Primiparous Age4712913937
 < 30451251(reference)136341(reference)
 ≥ 30240.72(0.127–4.006)0.709334(0.773–20.70)0.076
Table 6B

The Associations between TSPYL6 polymorphisms and clinical characteristics of breast cancer patients

Variablesrs11896604rs843706
GG + CGCCORa95% CIPbCA + CCAAORa95% CIPb
Age5512814439
 ≤ 4016411(reference)41161(reference)
 > 4039871.149(0.576–2.291)0.694103231.748(0.839–3.639)0.133
Age of Menarche5512814439
 ≤ 126191(reference)2231(reference)
 > 12491090.702(0.264–1.868)0.477122362.164(0.612–7.646)0.221
BMI5512814439
 ≤ 2438831(reference)98231(reference)
 > 2417450.825(0.419–1.624)0.57846160.67590.326–1.3970.288
Breastfeeding Duration5111913337
 ≤ 6391(reference)1021(reference)
 > 6481100.764(0.198–2.946)0.695123351.423(0.298–6.797)0.657
Clinical Stages5512814439
 I/II43921(reference)112231(reference)
 III/IV12360.713(0.338–1.505)0.37432160.411(0.194–0.869)0.018**
Estrogen Receptor5512814439
 negative19411(reference)49111(reference)
 positive36870.893(0.458–1.742)0.7495280.762(0.350–1.658)0.492
Family Tumor History5512814439
 no451111(reference)121351(reference)
 yes10171.151(0.617–3.410)0.3912341.663(0.539–5.131)0.372
Procreative Times5212313837
 < 1411011(reference)112301(reference)
 ≥ 111220.812(0.361–1.824)0.6142671.005(0.398–2.539)0.991
Progestrone Receptor5512814439
 negative25501(reference)59161(reference)
 positive30780.769(0.406–1.457)0.4285231.002(0.488–2.058)0.995
Tumor Location5512814439
 left25591(reference)66181(reference)
 right30671(reference)77201(reference)
 both02------0.63811------0.603
Tumor Size (cm)5512814439
 ≤ 327671(reference)76181(reference)
 > 328611.139(0.605–2.144)0.68668210.767(0.377–1.559)0.463
Tumor Type5512814439
 Infiltrating ductal carcinoma521131(reference)12837
 others3152.301(0.638–8.295)0.1921620.432(0.095–1.967)0.266
Incipience/Recurrence5412814438
 Incipience24851(reference)92171(reference)
 Recurrence30432.471(1.290–4.734)0.006*52210.458(0.222–0.944)0.032*
Lymph node metastasis5412614139
 no33721(reference)83221(reference)
 yes21540.848(0.442–1.627)0.62158170.904(0.442–1.851)0.783
Menopause5512814439
 no32831(reference)87281(reference)
 yes23451.326(0.694–2.532)0.39357111.668(0.770–3.614)0.192
Primiparous Age5212413937
 < 30501201(reference)136341(reference)
 ≥ 30240.833(0.148–4.697)0.836334(0.773–20.70)0.076

BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval. OR: odds ratio.

Adjusted for Age, Age of Menarche, BMI, Breastfeeding Duration, Clinical Stages, Estrogen Receptor, Family Tumor History, Procreative Times, Progestrone Receptor, Tumor Location, Tumor Size (cm), Tumor Type, Incipient/Recurrence, Lymph node metastasis, Menopause and Primiparous Age.

Two-sided Chi-square test for the distributions of genotype frequencies.

p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval. OR: odds ratio. Adjusted for Age, Age of Menarche, BMI, Breastfeeding Duration, Clinical Stages, Estrogen Receptor, Family Tumor History, Procreative Times, Progestrone Receptor, Tumor Location, Tumor Size (cm), Tumor Type, Incipient/Recurrence, Lymph node metastasis, Menopause and Primiparous Age. Two-sided Chi-square test for the distributions of genotype frequencies. p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the association between SNPs in the TSPYL6 gene and BC risk in Han Chinese women. We found that four SNPs (rs11896604, rs843706, rs11125529, and rs843711) were associated with the risk of BC in this population. Rs11896604 was associated with a decreased risk of BC in a dominant and genotype model, but the various genotypes were associated with an increased risk of recurrence in BC patients. An association between this locus and other diseases has not been previously reported. Rs843706 was associated with an increased risk of BC in a recessive model, but there was a decreased association between the SNP and the risk of recurrence as well as with clinical stage III/IV BC. We are the first to demonstrate an association between this locus and BC susceptibility. Rs11125529 was associated with a decreased risk of BC in a genotype model, but an increased risk of recurrence. Although Ding et al. reported neither the genotype nor the allele frequencies at rs11125529 in ACYP2 differed significantly between coronary heart disease patients and normal controls [13]. The association between the telomere length-related variant rs11125529 in ACYP2 and gastric cancer risk was previously investigated in a Chinese population, but no significant association was identified [14]. We found that the rs843711 genotypes in the TSPYL6 gene were inversely correlated with clinical stage III/IV BC. Finally, rs843645 and rs12615793 were not associated with the risk of BC. The function of TSPYL6 may be similar to those of other members of the TTSN superfamily. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying TSPYL6 function have not been elucidated. Mutation of TSPYL can cause sudden infant death with dysgenesis of the testes (SIDDT) in affected males, indicating that TSPYL is important for the development of the testis and other tissues such as the brain [15]. Although TSPYL is expressed in all tissues [16], the role of TSPYL in tumor cells is not clear. The TSPYL4 gene is located 25 kb from TSPYL, however no coding variants were identified in affected individuals with direct sequencing. The TSPYL1 gene does not contain any introns, but the exact composition has not been determined [17]. TSPYL2 gene and cyclin B can inhibit cell proliferation by arresting cell growth in response to DNA damage [18]. Thus, it has been suggested that TSPYL2 is a negative regulator of cell cycle progression. The TSPYL2 gene is silenced in glioma and malignant lung tissue, and in certain lung cancer cell lines [19]. Overexpression of TSPYL2 can inhibit human lung and breast cancer cell lines [20]. However, there is limited evidence for a direct function of TSPYL2 in cell cycle control. Interestingly, the TSPYL5 gene has been reported to suppress gastric cancer development [21]. Further studies are required to characterize the function of TSPYL6 and elucidate the mechanisms underlying the association between the TSPYL6 and BC susceptibility. Currently, the relationship between clinical characteristics in BC patients and TSPYL6 gene expression/function is not clear. Our study is the first to demonstrate that polymorphisms in TSPYL6 affect the pathogenesis of BC and are associated with clinicopathological characteristics of BC patients. Collectively, the results provide insight into the pathogenesis of BC. Although this study had sufficient statistical power, there were still some intrinsic limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small (183 cases and 195 controls). Therefore, our findings must be confirmed in studies with larger sample sizes as well as in a meta-analysis. Additionally, we only analyzed Han Chinese women. Therefore, our results must be validated in studies of other populations. Finally, although we identified significant associations between four SNPs (rs11896604, rs843706, rs11125529, and rs843711) and BC susceptibility, the mechanisms responsible for the associations are still unclear. Further studies of TSPYL6 and other members of the TTSN superfamily are necessary to dissect the mechanisms by which polymorphisms in these genes contribute to BC risk. Hereditary, endocrine, environmental, and life style factors should be also considered. We performed Bonferroni correction in our statistical analysis, but found no statistical significant associations between TSPYL6 SNPs and risk of BC. This may be due to the relatively small sample size, the selection criteria for TSPYL6 SNPs (minor allele frequency [MAF] > 5%), and the weakness of Bonferroni correction itself (the interpretation of a finding depends on the number of other tests performed). True differences may have been deemed non-significant given the likelihood of type II errors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study participants

A total of 183 patients with BC and 195 healthy women were included in this study. The patients were treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University between January 2013 and November 2015. All demographic and related clinical data including residential region, age, ethnicity, and education status were collected through a face-to-face questionnaire and a review of medical records. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Patients who had been recently diagnosed with primary BC (confirmed by histopathological analysis) were included in the study. Patients diagnosed with other types of cancers or who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded. Control patients who had undergone annual health evaluations were recruited from health checkup centers affiliated with our institution. All controls were matched with cases based on age (p = 0.218) and ethnicity. All control patients had no history of cancer. Factors that could influence the mutation rate were minimized. The participants were women who were ≥ 18 years old with good mental health and no blood relatives with BC going back three generations. This study was performed in accordance with the Chinese Department of Health and Human Services regulations for the protection of human research subjects. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Xi'an Jiao Tong University.

SNP selection and genotyping

Validated SNPs that had a MAF > 5% in the HapMap Asian population were selected for the association analysis [12, 20, 22, 23]. Venous blood samples (5 mL) were collected from each patient during a laboratory examination. DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using the Gold Mag-Mini Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Kit (version 3.0; TaKaRa, Japan) [24]. The DNA concentration was measured by spectrometry (DU530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA). The Sequenom MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 software (Sequenom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to design the multiplexed SNP Mass EXTEND assay. Genotyping was performed using a Sequenom MassARRAY RS1000 (Sequenom, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol [25]. The SequenomTyper 4.0 Software™ (Sequenom, Inc.) was used to manage and analyze the data [26]. The primers corresponding to each SNP are shown in Table 7. Based on these results, the following six SNPs were selected: rs843645, rs11125529, rs12615793, rs843711, rs11896604, and rs843706. The SNP data are shown in Table 3.
Table 7

Primers used for this study

SNP_ID1st-PCRP2nd-PCRPUEP_SEQ
rs843645ACGTTGGATGGAAATCTGA ATACCACCTACACGTTGGATGACAGTGCCTTTA GCAAGGTGTCATAGGCACTACT GTATC
rs11125529ACGTTGGATGGAGCTTAGTT GTTTACAGATGACGTTGGATGCCGAAGAAAAG AAGATGACAGAAAAGAAGATG ACTAAAACAT
rs12615793ACGTTGGATGTTTGAGCTTAG TTGTTTACACGTTGGATGATCTTGGCCCTT GAAGAAAAATTGAGTGACAA| ATATAAACTAC
rs843711ACGTTGGATGGACAAAGGACC TTACAACTCACGTTGGATGTGCCTTGTGGGA ATTAGAGCgggaTCAGGGAACCA GTGCAAA
rs11896604ACGTTGGATGAAGTCAGAATA GTGCTTACACGTTGGATGTGTCTCTGACCT AGCATGTAGTTAAGCTTGCAA GGAG
rs843706ACGTTGGATGTGAAAGCCAT AAATATTTTGACGTTGGATGTGAATAACTTGG TCTTATCcACTTGGTCTTATCT GATGC

Statistical analysis

Chi-squared tests (categorical variables) and Student's t-tests (continuous variables) were used to evaluate the differences in the demographic characteristics between the cases and controls [27]. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of each SNP was assessed in order to compare the expected frequencies of the genotypes in the control patients. All of the minor alleles were regarded as risk alleles for BC susceptibility. To evaluate associations between the SNPs and risk of BC in the four models (genotype, dominant, recessive, and additive), ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using unconditional logistic regression analysis [28]. In multivariate analyses, unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between each SNP and the risk of BC after adjusting for BMI, age, and menopause [28]. Linkage disequilibrium analysis and SNP haplotypes were analyzed using the Haploview software package (version 4.2) and the SHEsi software platform (http://www.nhgg.org/analysis/) [29]. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 17.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and all statistical tests were two-sided.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we have identified four novel associations between SNPs (rs11896604, rs843706, rs11125529, and rs843711) in TSPYL6 and BC. Our results suggest that these SNPs may contribute to BC development and possibly other complex genetic traits. These SNPs may function as molecular markers of BC susceptibility, and could therefore be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers in clinical studies of BC patients.
  27 in total

1.  Association of five single nucleotide polymorphisms at 6q25.1 with breast cancer risk in northwestern China.

Authors:  Long Zhou; Na He; Tian Feng; Tingting Geng; Tianbo Jin; Chao Chen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.

Authors:  Farin Kamangar; Graça M Dores; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  High constant incidence in twins and other relatives of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Peto; T M Mack
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Subcellular recruitment by TSG118 and TSPYL implicates a role for zinc finger protein 106 in a novel developmental pathway.

Authors:  Helmut Grasberger; Graeme I Bell
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.085

5.  Antiproliferative autoantigen CDA1 transcriptionally up-regulates p21(Waf1/Cip1) by activating p53 and MEK/ERK1/2 MAPK pathways.

Authors:  Yugang Tu; Weiping Wu; Tieqiao Wu; Zemin Cao; Richard Wilkins; Ban-Hock Toh; Mark E Cooper; Zhonglin Chai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  TSPYL5 is involved in cell growth and the resistance to radiation in A549 cells via the regulation of p21(WAF1/Cip1) and PTEN/AKT pathway.

Authors:  Eun Jin Kim; So Yong Lee; Tae Rim Kim; Soo Im Choi; Eun Wie Cho; Kug Chan Kim; In Gyu Kim
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  MTDH activation by 8q22 genomic gain promotes chemoresistance and metastasis of poor-prognosis breast cancer.

Authors:  Guohong Hu; Robert A Chong; Qifeng Yang; Yong Wei; Mario A Blanco; Feng Li; Michael Reiss; Jessie L-S Au; Bruce G Haffty; Yibin Kang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Association between previously identified loci affecting telomere length and coronary heart disease (CHD) in Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Hui Ding; Fen Yan; Lin-Lin Zhou; Xiu-Hai Ji; Xin-Nan Gu; Zhi-Wei Tang; Ru-Hua Chen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Identification of a duplication within the GDF9 gene and novel candidate genes for primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) by a customized high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization platform.

Authors:  A Norling; A L Hirschberg; K A Rodriguez-Wallberg; E Iwarsson; A Wedell; M Barbaro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Genome-wide association analysis in East Asians identifies breast cancer susceptibility loci at 1q32.1, 5q14.3 and 15q26.1.

Authors:  Qiuyin Cai; Ben Zhang; Hyuna Sung; Siew-Kee Low; Sun-Seog Kweon; Wei Lu; Jiajun Shi; Jirong Long; Wanqing Wen; Ji-Yeob Choi; Dong-Young Noh; Chen-Yang Shen; Keitaro Matsuo; Soo-Hwang Teo; Mi Kyung Kim; Ui Soon Khoo; Motoki Iwasaki; Mikael Hartman; Atsushi Takahashi; Kyota Ashikawa; Koichi Matsuda; Min-Ho Shin; Min Ho Park; Ying Zheng; Yong-Bing Xiang; Bu-Tian Ji; Sue K Park; Pei-Ei Wu; Chia-Ni Hsiung; Hidemi Ito; Yoshio Kasuga; Peter Kang; Shivaani Mariapun; Sei Hyun Ahn; Han Sung Kang; Kelvin Y K Chan; Ellen P S Man; Hiroji Iwata; Shoichiro Tsugane; Hui Miao; Jiemin Liao; Yusuke Nakamura; Michiaki Kubo; Ryan J Delahanty; Yanfeng Zhang; Bingshan Li; Chun Li; Yu-Tang Gao; Xiao-Ou Shu; Daehee Kang; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic variations in TERC and TERT genes are associated with lung cancer risk in a Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Gang Ye; Nan Tan; Chenyang Meng; Jingjie Li; Li Jing; Mengdan Yan; Tianbo Jin; Fulin Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-06

2.  Association of polymorphisms in the telomere-related gene ACYP2 with lung cancer risk in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Nanzheng Chen; Xiaomei Yang; Wen Guo; Jiangtao You; Qifei Wu; Guangjian Zhang; Haijun Li; Donghong Geng; Tianbo Jin; Junke Fu; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-27

Review 3.  Battle of the sexes: contrasting roles of testis-specific protein Y-encoded (TSPY) and TSPX in human oncogenesis.

Authors:  Yun-Fai Chris Lau; Yunmin Li; Tatsuo Kido
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Association between ACYP2 polymorphisms and the risk of renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Yuhe Wang; Yongtong Zhang; Yao Sun; Jiamin Wu; Junke Chang; Zichao Xiong; Fanglin Niu; Shanzhi Gu; Tianbo Jin
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  ACYP2 polymorphisms are associated with the risk of liver cancer in a Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Yu Sun; Zhenxiong Xu; Junnv Xu; Jingjie Li; Mengdan Yan; Jing Li; Tianbo Jin; Haifeng Lin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.