Literature DB >> 27458143

The differential impact of preoperative comorbidity on perioperative outcomes following thoracoscopic and open lobectomies.

Oliver K Jawitz1, Zuoheng Wang2, Daniel J Boffa3, Frank C Detterbeck3, Justin D Blasberg3, Anthony W Kim4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is quickly becoming the standard of care for many patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lung conditions. There is a lack of published data defining the differential impact of preoperative patient comorbidity on outcomes following VATS and OPEN lobectomies, which would be beneficial for procedure selection and clinical decision-making.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 2008-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database was performed. Demographic and clinical data on patients ≥18 years having undergone VATS or OPEN lobectomy were included. Measured outcomes included postoperative length of stay (PO-LOS), in-hospital mortality and perioperative pulmonary complications. PO-LOS was further analysed using multivariable logistic regression and cumulative incidence models.
RESULTS: VATS lobectomies were associated with shorter PO-LOS and fewer complications even after censoring for inpatient mortality. Furthermore, VATS lobectomy patients had improved PO-LOS compared with OPEN lobectomy patients, even with greater comorbidity. Logistic regression modelling for PO-LOS ≥14 days identified independent predictors of prolonged PO-LOS, including male gender, non-elective admission, lower hospital lobectomy volume, several Elixhauser comorbidities and performance of OPEN lobectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: The expected postoperative length of stay for a patient treated by OPEN lobectomy is approximately equal to that of a VATS lobectomy patient with an additional 2-3 comorbidities. The VATS approach remains advantageous with respect to PO-LOS, regardless of the number of comorbidities.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lobectomy; Thoracoscopic; VATS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27458143     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  8 in total

Review 1.  A glance at the history of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Tommaso Claudio Mineo; Vincenzo Ambrogi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-11-07

2.  Minimally invasive thoracic surgery in lung cancer: respecting oncologic principles is the key.

Authors:  Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; William Guido-Guerrero; Albert Bolaños-Cubillo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

3.  Development and validation of nomogram estimating post-surgery hospital stay of lung cancer patients: relevance for predictive, preventive, and personalized healthcare strategies.

Authors:  Xiang-Lin Hu; Song-Tao Xu; Xiao-Cen Wang; Jin-Long Luo; Dong-Ni Hou; Xiao-Min Zhang; Chen Bao; Dong Yang; Yuan-Lin Song; Chun-Xue Bai
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.543

4.  Comparison between video-assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer resection and robot-assisted lung cancer resection: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianci Chai; Yuhan Lin; Zhimin Shen; Sui Chen; Zhenyang Zhang; Wenwei Lin; Peipei Zhang; Mingqiang Kang; Jiangbo Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of lung cancer: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianci Chai; Yuhan Lin; Mingqiang Kang; Jiangbo Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Efficacy and safety of omitting chest drains after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lin Huang; Henrik Kehlet; Bo Laksáfoss Holbek; Tina Kold Jensen; René Horsleben Petersen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 7.  The evolution of operative access in lung surgery.

Authors:  Aleksei Vladimirovich Mikheev; Sergey Nikolaevich Trushin; Aleksandr Yurievich Ogoreltsev
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2022-01-09

8.  Characteristics of Medical Adverse Events/Near Misses Associated With Laparoscopic/Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Study Based on the Japanese National Database of Medical Adverse Events.

Authors:  Takashige Abe; Sachiyo Murai; Yasuyuki Nasuhara; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.844

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.