Literature DB >> 27457626

Economic Decision Model Suggests Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is Superior to Hemiarthroplasty in Young Patients with End-stage Shoulder Arthritis.

Suneel B Bhat1, Mark Lazarus1, Charles Getz1, Gerald R Williams1, Surena Namdari2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young patients with severe glenohumeral arthritis pose a challenging management problem for shoulder surgeons. Two controversial treatment options are total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty. This study aims to characterize costs, as expressed by reimbursements for episodes of acute care, and outcomes associated with each treatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: for patients 30 to 50 years old with severe end-stage glenohumeral arthritis refractory to conservative management, (1) are more years of patient-derived satisfactory outcome by the Neer criteria and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) achieved using a TSA or a hemiarthroplasty; (2) does a TSA or a hemiarthroplasty result in a greater number of revision procedures; and (3) does a TSA or a hemiarthroplasty result in greater associated costs to society?
METHODS: The incidence of glenohumeral arthritis among 30- to 50-year-old patients, outcomes, reoperation probabilities, and associated costs from TSA and hemiarthroplasty were derived from the literature. A Markov chain decision tree model was developed from these estimates with number of revisions, cost of management for patients to 70 years old as defined by reimbursement for acute-care episodes, years with "satisfactory" or "excellent" outcome by the modified Neer criteria, and QALYs gained as principle outcome measures. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted with a cohort representing the at-risk population for shoulder arthritis between 30 and 50 years old in the United States.
RESULTS: During the lifetime of a cohort of 5279 patients, hemiarthroplasty as the initial treatment resulted in 59,574 patient years of satisfactory or excellent results (11.29 per patient) and average QALYs gained of 6.55, whereas TSA as the initial treatment resulted in 85,969 patient years of satisfactory or excellent results (16.29 per patient) and average QALYs gained of 7.96. During the lifetime of a cohort of 5279 patients, a hemiarthroplasty as the initial treatment led to 2090 lifetime revisions (0.4 per patient), whereas a TSA as the initial treatment led to 1605 lifetime revisions (0.3 per patient). During the lifetime of a cohort of 5279 patients, a hemiarthroplasty as initial treatment resulted in USD 132,500,000 associated direct reimbursements (USD 25,000 per patient), whereas a TSA as initial treatment resulted in USD 125,500,000 associated direct reimbursements (USD 23,700 per patient).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of end-stage glenohumeral arthritis refractory to conservative treatment in patients 30 to 50 years old in the United States with TSA, instead of hemiarthroplasty, would result in greater cost savings, avoid a substantial number of revision procedures, and result in greater years of satisfactory or excellent patient outcomes and greater QALYs gained. On a population level, TSA is the cost-effective treatment for glenohumeral arthritis in patients 30 to 50 years old. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, economic and decision analysis study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457626      PMCID: PMC5052199          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4991-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  Wide variation in hospital and physician payment rates evidence of provider market power.

Authors:  Paul B Ginsburg
Journal:  Res Brief       Date:  2010-11

2.  Physician Payment after the SGR--The New Meritocracy.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 4--Analyzing the model and interpreting the results.

Authors:  M D Krahn; G Naglie; D Naimark; D A Redelmeier; A S Detsky
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Hemiarthroplasty vs total shoulder replacement for rotator cuff intact osteoarthritis: how do they fare after a decade?

Authors:  Michael J Sandow; Huw David; Steven J Bentall
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Future patient demand for shoulder arthroplasty by younger patients: national projections.

Authors:  Eric M Padegimas; Mitchell Maltenfort; Mark D Lazarus; Matthew L Ramsey; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis: a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John Sperling; Rachelle Buchbinder; Kelly McMaken
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Cost-effective prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total joint arthroplasty: warfarin versus aspirin.

Authors:  Reza Mostafavi Tabatabaee; Mohammad R Rasouli; Mitchell G Maltenfort; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty-five years or younger with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Robert Bartelt; John W Sperling; Cathy D Schleck; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Economic evaluation using decision analytical modelling: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou; Alastair Gray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-04-11

10.  Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. A Markov decision analysis.

Authors:  James Slover; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif Ivar Havelin; Lars Birger Engesaeter; Ove Furnes; Ivan Tomek; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence that the outcomes of primary anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty are getting better?

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Moni B Neradilek; Jason E Hsu; Benjamin C Service; Albert O Gee; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Evaluating Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: The Relative Impact of Patient Age, Activity Level, Symptoms, and Kellgren-Lawrence Grade on Treatment.

Authors:  Adam Schumaier; Joseph Abboud; Brian Grawe; J Gabriel Horneff; Charles Getz; Anthony Romeo; Jay Keener; Richard Friedman; Ed Yian; Stephanie Muh; Gregory Nicholson; Ruth Delaney; Randall Otto; William William; J T Tokish; Gerald Williams; Jack Kazanjian; Joshua Dines; Matthew Ramsey; Andrew Green; Scott Paxton; Surena Namdari; Brody Flanagin; Samer Hasan; Scott Kaar; Anthony Miniaci; Frances Cuomo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

Review 3.  Cost Analysis in Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Tischer; Robert Lenz; Jochen Breinlinger-O'Reilly; Christoph Lutter
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-13

4.  CORR Insights®: Primary Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty: What Can Be Learned From 359 Cases That Were Surgically Revised?

Authors:  Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.