Literature DB >> 27457542

The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods.

Mana Dembo1, Davorka Radovčić2, Heather M Garvin3, Myra F Laird4, Lauren Schroeder5, Jill E Scott6, Juliet Brophy7, Rebecca R Ackermann8, Chares M Musiba9, Darryl J de Ruiter10, Arne Ø Mooers11, Mark Collard12.   

Abstract

Homo naledi is a recently discovered species of fossil hominin from South Africa. A considerable amount is already known about H. naledi but some important questions remain unanswered. Here we report a study that addressed two of them: "Where does H. naledi fit in the hominin evolutionary tree?" and "How old is it?" We used a large supermatrix of craniodental characters for both early and late hominin species and Bayesian phylogenetic techniques to carry out three analyses. First, we performed a dated Bayesian analysis to generate estimates of the evolutionary relationships of fossil hominins including H. naledi. Then we employed Bayes factor tests to compare the strength of support for hypotheses about the relationships of H. naledi suggested by the best-estimate trees. Lastly, we carried out a resampling analysis to assess the accuracy of the age estimate for H. naledi yielded by the dated Bayesian analysis. The analyses strongly supported the hypothesis that H. naledi forms a clade with the other Homo species and Australopithecus sediba. The analyses were more ambiguous regarding the position of H. naledi within the (Homo, Au. sediba) clade. A number of hypotheses were rejected, but several others were not. Based on the available craniodental data, Homo antecessor, Asian Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens, and Au. sediba could all be the sister taxon of H. naledi. According to the dated Bayesian analysis, the most likely age for H. naledi is 912 ka. This age estimate was supported by the resampling analysis. Our findings have a number of implications. Most notably, they support the assignment of the new specimens to Homo, cast doubt on the claim that H. naledi is simply a variant of H. erectus, and suggest H. naledi is younger than has been previously proposed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian phylogenetic analysis; Dinaledi hominins; Genus Homo; Morphological clock

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457542     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  21 in total

1.  The age of Homo naledi and associated sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa.

Authors:  Paul Hgm Dirks; Eric M Roberts; Hannah Hilbert-Wolf; Jan D Kramers; John Hawks; Anthony Dosseto; Mathieu Duval; Marina Elliott; Mary Evans; Rainer Grün; John Hellstrom; Andy Ir Herries; Renaud Joannes-Boyau; Tebogo V Makhubela; Christa J Placzek; Jessie Robbins; Carl Spandler; Jelle Wiersma; Jon Woodhead; Lee R Berger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  The Efficacy of Consensus Tree Methods for Summarizing Phylogenetic Relationships from a Posterior Sample of Trees Estimated from Morphological Data.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Reilly; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  New fossil remains of Homo naledi from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.

Authors:  John Hawks; Marina Elliott; Peter Schmid; Steven E Churchill; Darryl J de Ruiter; Eric M Roberts; Hannah Hilbert-Wolf; Heather M Garvin; Scott A Williams; Lucas K Delezene; Elen M Feuerriegel; Patrick Randolph-Quinney; Tracy L Kivell; Myra F Laird; Gaokgatlhe Tawane; Jeremy M DeSilva; Shara E Bailey; Juliet K Brophy; Marc R Meyer; Matthew M Skinner; Matthew W Tocheri; Caroline VanSickle; Christopher S Walker; Timothy L Campbell; Brian Kuhn; Ashley Kruger; Steven Tucker; Alia Gurtov; Nompumelelo Hlophe; Rick Hunter; Hannah Morris; Becca Peixotto; Maropeng Ramalepa; Dirk van Rooyen; Mathabela Tsikoane; Pedro Boshoff; Paul Hgm Dirks; Lee R Berger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  N-glycolyl groups of nonhuman chondroitin sulfates survive in ancient fossils.

Authors:  Anne K Bergfeld; Roger Lawrence; Sandra L Diaz; Oliver M T Pearce; Darius Ghaderi; Pascal Gagneux; Meave G Leakey; Ajit Varki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Homoplasy in the evolution of modern human-like joint proportions in Australopithecus afarensis.

Authors:  Anjali M Prabhat; Catherine K Miller; Thomas Cody Prang; Jeffrey Spear; Scott A Williams; Jeremy M DeSilva
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Divergence-time estimates for hominins provide insight into encephalization and body mass trends in human evolution.

Authors:  Hans P Püschel; Ornella C Bertrand; Joseph E O'Reilly; René Bobe; Thomas A Püschel
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 19.100

7.  Long-term patterns of body mass and stature evolution within the hominin lineage.

Authors:  Manuel Will; Adrián Pablos; Jay T Stock
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Homo naledi and Pleistocene hominin evolution in subequatorial Africa.

Authors:  Lee R Berger; John Hawks; Paul Hgm Dirks; Marina Elliott; Eric M Roberts
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  New opportunities rising.

Authors:  Jessica C Thompson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Estimating Genetic Similarity Matrices Using Phylogenies.

Authors:  Shijia Wang; Shufei Ge; Caroline Colijn; Priscila Biller; Liangliang Wang; Lloyd T Elliott
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 1.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.