Literature DB >> 27457382

Foxp3 overexpression in tumor cells predicts poor survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Jing-Jing Song1, Si-Jia Zhao2, Juan Fang1, Da Ma1, Xiang-Qi Liu1, Xiao-Bing Chen1, Yun Wang1, Bin Cheng3, Zhi Wang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forkhead Box P3 (Foxp3) is a regulatory T cells marker, and its expression correlates with prognosis in a number of malignancies. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship of Foxp3 expression with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
METHODS: Foxp3 expression was examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 273 OSCC patients. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between Foxp3 expression, the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in OSCC.
RESULTS: Foxp3 protein expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (P <0.01). Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that Foxp3 was an independent factor for both 5 years overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (both P <0.01). Patients with Foxp3 overexpression had shorter OS and RFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results determined that elevated Foxp3 protein expression was a predictive factor of outcome in OSCC and could act as a promising therapeutic target.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Five years overall survival; Foxp3; Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC); Relapse-Free Survival(RFS)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457382      PMCID: PMC4960787          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2419-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Consisting 90 % of oral malignancies, oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide due to poor prognosis. The annual estimated occurrence of lip and oral cavity malignancies is around 400,000 cases [1]. Despite a rapidly growing number of treatment options, the 5-year survival rate of OSCC still remains under 60 %. Apart from classification of differentiation and TNM stage there are as yet hardly any predictive factors for prognosis in patients with OSCC. In this situation it is of utmost importance to identify potential molecular markers and targets which provide the necessary condition of accurate prediction of 5 years overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) [2]. Forkhead Box P3 (Foxp3) has played a key role in the immunosuppressive functions in Tregs and a marked molecule of Tregs as well [3]. The presence of Foxp3 expression in cancer cells has been proved to be associated with tumor biological behaviors regulation [4]. A series of studies have illustrated that the mutation or loss of Foxp3 might lead to a high rate of tumor formation, such as developing in mammary [5] or prostatic [6] epithelial tissues, which indicated Foxp3 as an oncosuppressive factor. Moreover, high tumor Foxp3 levels in tumor cells are also found to be related to better outcome of cancer patients of gastric cancer [7] and Her2-positive breast carcinoma [8]. In contrast, only two retrospective studies in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) [9] and orohypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OHSCC) [10] have demonstrated accordant results that high Foxp3 expression was associated with poor overall survival. Until now, no further studies have been conducted to examine the prognostic significance of Foxp3 expression in OSCC. In the present study, we investigated the tumor cell Foxp3 expression in a large 273 case OSCC cohort and determined the correlation of Foxp3 with clinicopathologic factors, relapse, and prognostic significance of OSCC.

Methods

Study population

Patients included in the study were 188 males and 85 females with OSCC treated at the Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University between 2002 and 2009. Determination of TNM classification is on basis of the Union for International Cancer Control 2002 standard (UICC2002). The end point of this study is that of 5 year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Pathological examination was performed by two independent pathologist according to the 2005 revised World Health Organization classification of tumors.

Tissue microarrays and IHC testing of patient samples

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed for 273 patients cohorts using three 2 mm tissue cores collected from areas of OSCC epithelium on each tissue block. Sections were cut into 4 μm thickness, deparaffinized, rehydrated and treated with a peroxidase block. Foxp3 staining procedures was based on manufacturers protocol. Heat-based antigen retrieval was carried out by microwave treatment in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The sections were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human Foxp3 (clone AO1042a) diluted 1:200 (Abgent, USA) at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with ready to use EnVision HRP-IgG secondary antibody (DAKO, Denmark) for 30 min. Staining was developed using 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as a chromogen substrate. The nuclei were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Predominantly cytoplasmic staining was observed in tumor cells. The immunoreactive score (IRS) was calculated as intensity of the staining reaction multiplied by the percentage of positive cells. Based on the IRS values, Foxp3 were scored as low, medium and high [10]. Representative micrographs indicating that medium and high levels of Foxp3 were found only in malignant tissues, while healthy epithelial tissues displayed only low levels of Foxp3. Consequently according to the HLA & Cancer Component of the 12th IHW [11], the results were confirmed by two experienced pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathologic data of the patients. The whole sections were repeatly operated in the condition that tissue microarray staining was not typical represented. Negative controls which were treated without primary antibodies were implemented during each experimentation.

Statistical analysis

The OS rate was the primary endpoint of this study, and the secondary endpoint was the relapse-free survival (RFS) of the OSCC patients. OS was defined as the duration from the date of each patient’s hospitalization to the date of death from any cause or to the censoring of the patient at the date of the last follow-up. RFS was defined as the time from hospitalization to local, regional, distant failure, or other second primary cancer. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. The relationships between Foxp3 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics were using Linear-by-Linear Association test (Age, Differentiation, T stage, N stage, and Clinical stage), and Pearson’s chi-square test (Gender, Smoking, Drinking, and Tumor site). Patient survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Log-Rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze the survival data. Multiple comparison (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test) was performed to analyze the mean OSCC survival time of Foxp3 staining value. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Association of Foxp3 with lymph node metastasis and other clinicopathological variables

In a cohort of 273 patients with OSCC, Foxp3 expression was determined to be low in 99 (36.3 %), medium in 106 (38.8 %) and high in 68 (24.9 %) patients (Fig. 1). The median age of patients at diagnosis was 60 (range 24–85) and was followed up for an average of 3.58 years. Our analyses showed that the level of Foxp3 in OSCC was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (P <0.001), but was not associated with age, gender, smoking, drinking, grade of differentiation, tumor site, T stage, Clinical stage (P >0.05) (Table 1). Notably, the correlation of Foxp3 with prominent lymph node metastasis positivity suggested a potential role of Foxp3 in increased invasion and metastasis of OSCC.
Fig. 1

Expression and scoring of Foxp3 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) tissue. Representative micrographs from tissue microarray (TMA) cores indicating the low, medium and high cytoplasmic expression in tumor nest

Table 1

Correlation between the Foxp3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of OSCC

Clinical pathological feature N Expression of Foxp3
Stain value = 1Stain value = 2Stain value = 3 P Value
N = 99 N = 106 N = 68
Age0.65
 <6013351 (38.3 %)49 (36.9 %)33 (24.8 %)
 ≥6014048 (34.3 %)57 (40.7 %)35 (25.0 %)
Sex0.29
 Male18863 (33.5 %)74 (39.4 %)51 (27.1 %)
 Female8536 (42.4 %)32 (37.6 %)17 (20.0 %)
Smoking0.84
 Yes13247 (35.6 %)50 (37.9 %)35 (26.5 %)
 No14152 (36.9 %)56 (39.7 %)33 (23.4 %)
Drinking0.47
 Yes13145 (34.4 %)49 (37.4 %)37 (28.2 %)
 No14254 (38.0 %)57 (40.1 %)31 (21.9 %)
Differentiation0.30
 High20073 (36.5 %)82 (41.0 %)45 (22.5 %)
 Medium6423 (35.9 %)22 (34.4 %)19 (29.7 %)
 Low93 (33.3 %)2 (22.2 %)4 (44.5 %)
Tumor site0.23
 Gingiva5216 (30.8 %)19 (36.5 %)17 (32.7 %)
 Tongue13150 (38.1 %)47 (35.9 %)34 (26.0 %)
 Buccal6126 (42.6 %)24 (39.4 %)11 (18.0 %)
 Othersa 297 (24.1 %)16 (55.2 %)6 (20.7 %)
T stage0.63
 T1-T218668 (36.5 %)74 (39.8 %)44 (23.7 %)
 T3-T48731 (35.6 %)32 (36.8 %)24 (27.6 %)
N stage0.000***
 N018373 (39.9 %)82 (44.8 %)28 (15.3 %)
 N1-N39026 (28.9 %)24 (26.7 %)40 (44.4 %)
Clinical Stage0.09
 I-II14255 (38.8 %)59 (41.5 %)28 (19.7 %)
 III-IV13144 (33.6 %)47 (35.9 %)40 (30.5 %)

Stain value = 1, low level of Foxp3 expression; Stain value = 2, medium level of Foxp3 expression; Stain value = 3, high levels of Foxp3 expression

aOthers included include hard palate, oropharynx and lips

P value was determined using the Linear-by-Linear Association test. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001

Correlation between the Foxp3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of OSCC Stain value = 1, low level of Foxp3 expression; Stain value = 2, medium level of Foxp3 expression; Stain value = 3, high levels of Foxp3 expression aOthers included include hard palate, oropharynx and lips P value was determined using the Linear-by-Linear Association test. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001

Relationship between Foxp3 expression and prognosis in OSCC patients

To determine whether Foxp3 expression might be a prognostic predictor in OSCC, we examined Foxp3 expression levels and the clinical follow-up information in all 273 patients of OSCC by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-Rank test. 126 patients died during the follow-up period, whereas 147 patients were still alive at the end of follow-up. The crude and adjusted relative risks of all-cause mortality in these 273 patients were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. As univariate analyses shown in Table 1, the clinicopathological parameters such as N stage, Clinical stage and Foxp3 expression were related to 5-year OS rate, whereas T stage, Clinical stage and Foxp3 expression were related to 5-year RFS rate. Multivariate analyses were used to reveal that T stage, N stage, Clinical stage and Foxp3 expression were the independent risk factors for OS, and Foxp3 expression were the most important risk factor for relapse (Tables 2 and 3; Fig. 2).
Table 2

Univariate Analyses of Selected Characteristics with 5 years Overall Survival (OS) and Relapse-free Survival (RFS) among Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (N = 273)

Characteristics5-years OS rate (95 % CI) P Value5-year RFS rate (95 % CI) P Value
T stage
 T1-T20.415 (0.256–0.574)0.2120.652 (0.540–0.764)0.034*
 T3-T40.252 (−0.101–0.605)0.713 (0.448–0.978)
N stage
 N00.470 (0.290–0.650)0.000***0.671 (0.548–0.794)0.584
 N1-N30.252 (−0.101–0.605)0.733 (0.623–0.843)
Clinical stage
 I-II0.437 (0.249–0.625)0.012*0.627 (0.502–0.752)0.043*
 III-IV0.303 (0.052–0.554)0.727 (0.527–0.927)
Foxp3 staining value
 10.474 (0.268–0.680)0.000***0.701 (0.562–0.840)0.003**
 20.611 (0.499–0.723)0.795 (0.711–0.879)
 30.162 (0.074–0.250)0.330 (0.133–0.793)

Abbreviations: 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval

P value was determined using the Log-rank test. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001

Table 3

Multivariate COX Regression analysis on factors for OSCC survival

Characteristics5-years OS rate5-year RFS rate
HR (95 % CI) P ValueHR (95 % CI) P Value
T Stage
 T1 or T20.547 (0.331–0.904)0.019*1.188 (0.483–2.923)0.707
 T3 or T4ReferenceReference
N Stage
 N00.238 (0.143–0.398)0.000***0.614 (0.280–1.347)0.223
 N1-N3ReferenceReference
Clinical Stage
 I-II2.503 (1.348–4.649)0.004**2.249 (0.865–5.852)0.097
 III-IVReferenceReference
Foxp3 Staining Value
 10.197 (0.123–0.315)0.000***0.451 (0.239–0.849)0.014*
 20.271 (0.174–0.422)0.000***0.371 (0.192–0.714)0.003**
 3ReferenceReference

Abbreviations: OS overall survival, RFS, relapse free survival, HR hazard ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval

P value was determined using Cox proportional-hazards model. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001

Fig. 2

Survival curves of Foxp3 of OSCC patients. It showed that Kaplan–Meier curves of 5 years Overall Survival (OS) and Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) of different Foxp3 staining values. PValues among different groups were calculated by the Log-Rank test. There was significant difference between high Foxp3 staining and either of the other two staining grades

Univariate Analyses of Selected Characteristics with 5 years Overall Survival (OS) and Relapse-free Survival (RFS) among Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (N = 273) Abbreviations: 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval P value was determined using the Log-rank test. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001 Multivariate COX Regression analysis on factors for OSCC survival Abbreviations: OS overall survival, RFS, relapse free survival, HR hazard ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval P value was determined using Cox proportional-hazards model. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001 Expression and scoring of Foxp3 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) tissue. Representative micrographs from tissue microarray (TMA) cores indicating the low, medium and high cytoplasmic expression in tumor nest Survival curves of Foxp3 of OSCC patients. It showed that Kaplan–Meier curves of 5 years Overall Survival (OS) and Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) of different Foxp3 staining values. PValues among different groups were calculated by the Log-Rank test. There was significant difference between high Foxp3 staining and either of the other two staining grades The results showed that the median overall survival time in patients with high levels of Foxp3 expression (stain value = 3) (14, 2–56 months, n = 68) was significantly shorter than that in patients with a low level of Foxp3 expression (stain value = 1) (43, 4–93 months, n = 99) (P = 0.000) and medium level of Foxp3 expression (stain value = 2) (38, 2–81 months, n = 106) (P = 0.000). Furthermore, the median relapse-free survival time was markedly longer in the low Foxp3 expression group (39, 2–93 months, n = 99) (P = 0.000) and medium Foxp3 expression group (36, 2–59 months, n = 106) (P = 0.000) compared to that in the high Foxp3 expression group (11, 1–54 months, n = 68). These results indicated that patients with high levels of Foxp3 expression have a worse prognosis than those with low levels of Foxp3 expression (Table 4). The hazard ratio of 5 years OS for low and medium Foxp3 expression group are 0.197 (P = 0.000) and 0.271 (P = 0.000), respectively, while that of relapse-free survival (RFS) for low and medium Foxp3 expression group are 0.451 (P = 0.014) and 0.371 (P = 0.003) taking high Foxp3 expression group as reference (Table 3).
Table 4

Multiple comparison with the median OSCC survival time of Foxp3 staining value

Foxp3 Staining ValueOSRFS
median time (range) (months) P ValueMean time (range) (months) P Value
1 (n = 99)43 (4–93)0.000***39 (2–93)0.000***
2 (n = 106)38 (2–81)0.000***36 (2–59)0.000***
3 (n = 68)14 (2–56)11 (1–54)
ReferenceReference

Abbreviations: OS overall survival, RFS relapse free survival

P value was determined using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001

Multiple comparison with the median OSCC survival time of Foxp3 staining value Abbreviations: OS overall survival, RFS relapse free survival P value was determined using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. *,P<0.05;**, P<0.01;***, P<0.001

Discussion

In the present study, the expression of Foxp3 was investigated in 273 OSCC tissues by immunohistochemistry. We found that Foxp3 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and clinical outcome in OSCC. Considering these findings, we suggest that Foxp3 is a potential novel marker for prognosis and represents a therapeutic target for the treatment of OSCC patients. Continuous effort has been made to identify molecular biomarkers that could provide accurate information regarding OSCC prognosis. While the potential role of tumor Foxp3 as prognostic biomarker of overall survival has been previously investigated, only two studies addressed this issue and draw accordant conclusion that high Foxp3 expression was associated with poor overall survival in patients with TSCC and OHSCC respectively [9, 10]. But the relationship with RFS is not clear. And no association was found with lymph node metastasis. Takenaka et al. observed that tumor cytoplasm Foxp3 expression was associated with worse relapse-free survival in breast cancer [12]. In small cell lung cancer, relapse- free survival in patients with Foxp3-positive tumor was better with earlier follow-up [13]. Whether Foxp3-positive cancer cells are relevant to recurrence is controversial. For all the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma(HNSCC) types, the relationship of Foxp3 expression with RFS is not clear. This is the first study to describe the association of Foxp3 expression with both five years overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in OSCC patients. It helps to define the possible link between the biological function of Foxp3 and the progression of OSCC. Moreover, we provided evidence that Foxp3 expressed by OSCC cells might play a role in the metastasis of OSCC. We found that OSCC patients with high tumor Foxp3 expression had significantly shorter survival time and more lymphnodes involvement than other groups. Although no association was found with lymph node metastasis in the previous TSCC and OHSCC cohort studies, there is still considerable amount of evidence available which indicates Foxp3 expression in breast cancer [14], gastric cancer [6], non-small cell lung cancer [15] and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [16] is correlated with tumor metastasis. The molecular mechanism of Foxp3 about metastasis remained unclear. One study demonstrated that Foxp3 inhibited breast cancer cell adhesion, invasion and metastasis, while study on the molecular mechanism revealed that Foxp3 inhibited breast cancer metastasis by down-regulating CD44 expression directly [17]. Further studies are required to elucidate its mechanism in OSCC.

Conclusions

In summary, this study demonstrated that Foxp3 expressed in OSCC cells were significantly correlated with worse prognosis of both overall survival and relapse-free survival in OSCC. Ultimately, these findings provided evidence that Foxp3 expressed by OSCC cells might play a role in the invasion of OSCC, and tumoral Foxp3 might be suitable as a prognostic marker in OSCC. More studies are needed to further explore how tumor cells regulating the metastasis behavior during this interaction, especially in light of the current anticancer efforts to interfere with Foxp3 expression.

Abbreviations

Foxp3, Forkhead Box P3; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IRS, immunoreactive score; OHSCC, orohypopharynxsquamous cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; RFS, relapse-free survival; TMAs, tissue microarrays; TSCC, tongue squamous cell carcinoma
  17 in total

1.  The Global Burden of Cancer 2013.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Daniel Dicker; Amanda Pain; Hannah Hamavid; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Michael F MacIntyre; Christine Allen; Gillian Hansen; Rachel Woodbrook; Charles Wolfe; Randah R Hamadeh; Ami Moore; Andrea Werdecker; Bradford D Gessner; Braden Te Ao; Brian McMahon; Chante Karimkhani; Chuanhua Yu; Graham S Cooke; David C Schwebel; David O Carpenter; David M Pereira; Denis Nash; Dhruv S Kazi; Diego De Leo; Dietrich Plass; Kingsley N Ukwaja; George D Thurston; Kim Yun Jin; Edgar P Simard; Edward Mills; Eun-Kee Park; Ferrán Catalá-López; Gabrielle deVeber; Carolyn Gotay; Gulfaraz Khan; H Dean Hosgood; Itamar S Santos; Janet L Leasher; Jasvinder Singh; James Leigh; Jost B Jonas; Jost Jonas; Juan Sanabria; Justin Beardsley; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Ken Takahashi; Richard C Franklin; Luca Ronfani; Marcella Montico; Luigi Naldi; Marcello Tonelli; Johanna Geleijnse; Max Petzold; Mark G Shrime; Mustafa Younis; Naohiro Yonemoto; Nicholas Breitborde; Paul Yip; Farshad Pourmalek; Paulo A Lotufo; Alireza Esteghamati; Graeme J Hankey; Raghib Ali; Raimundas Lunevicius; Reza Malekzadeh; Robert Dellavalle; Robert Weintraub; Robyn Lucas; Roderick Hay; David Rojas-Rueda; Ronny Westerman; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Sandra Nolte; Scott Patten; Scott Weichenthal; Semaw Ferede Abera; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Ivy Shiue; Tim Driscoll; Tommi Vasankari; Ubai Alsharif; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Vasiliy V Vlassov; W S Marcenes; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Yohannes Adama Melaku; Yuichiro Yano; Al Artaman; Ismael Campos; Jennifer MacLachlan; Ulrich Mueller; Daniel Kim; Matias Trillini; Babak Eshrati; Hywel C Williams; Kenji Shibuya; Rakhi Dandona; Kinnari Murthy; Benjamin Cowie; Azmeraw T Amare; Carl Abelardo Antonio; Carlos Castañeda-Orjuela; Coen H van Gool; Francesco Violante; In-Hwan Oh; Kedede Deribe; Kjetil Soreide; Luke Knibbs; Maia Kereselidze; Mark Green; Rosario Cardenas; Nobhojit Roy; Taavi Tillmann; Taavi Tillman; Yongmei Li; Hans Krueger; Lorenzo Monasta; Subhojit Dey; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; G Anil Kumar; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Lalit Dandona; Haidong Wang; Stein Emil Vollset; Ali Mokdad; Joshua A Salomon; Rafael Lozano; Theo Vos; Mohammad Forouzanfar; Alan Lopez; Christopher Murray; Mohsen Naghavi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Association of FOXP3 expression with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Fotinos-Ioannis D Dimitrakopoulos; Helen Papadaki; Anna G Antonacopoulou; Anastasia Kottorou; Andreas D Gotsis; Chrisoula Scopa; Haralabos P Kalofonos; Athanasia Mouzaki
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  FOXP3 suppresses breast cancer metastasis through downregulation of CD44.

Authors:  Cun Zhang; Yujin Xu; Qiang Hao; Shuning Wang; Hong Li; Jialin Li; Yuan Gao; Meng Li; Weina Li; Xiaochang Xue; Shouzhen Wu; Yingqi Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Foxp3 expressed by tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells correlates with clinicopathologic features and overall survival in tongue squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Yu-jie Liang; Hai-chao Liu; Yu-xiong Su; Tong-han Zhang; Mei Chu; Li-zhong Liang; Gui-qing Liao
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 5.  Regulatory T cells in nonlymphoid tissues.

Authors:  Dalia Burzyn; Christophe Benoist; Diane Mathis
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 25.606

6.  Expression of FOXP3 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma relating to the clinical data.

Authors:  L Xue; H-Q Lu; J He; X-W Zhao; L Zhong; Z-Z Zhang; Z-F Xu
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  Somatic single hits inactivate the X-linked tumor suppressor FOXP3 in the prostate.

Authors:  Lizhong Wang; Runhua Liu; Weiquan Li; Chong Chen; Hiroto Katoh; Guo-Yun Chen; Beth McNally; Lin Lin; Penghui Zhou; Tao Zuo; Kathleen A Cooney; Yang Liu; Pan Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  FOXP3 expression and overall survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Merlo; Patrizia Casalini; Maria Luisa Carcangiu; Chiara Malventano; Tiziana Triulzi; Sylvie Mènard; Elda Tagliabue; Andrea Balsari
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  FOXP3 is an X-linked breast cancer suppressor gene and an important repressor of the HER-2/ErbB2 oncogene.

Authors:  Tao Zuo; Lizhong Wang; Carl Morrison; Xing Chang; Huiming Zhang; Weiquan Li; Yan Liu; Yin Wang; Xingluo Liu; Michael W Y Chan; Jin-Qing Liu; Richard Love; Chang-Gong Liu; Virginia Godfrey; Rulong Shen; Tim H-M Huang; Tianyu Yang; Bae Keun Park; Cun-Yu Wang; Pan Zheng; Yang Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  FOXP3 expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with breast cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Miki Takenaka; Naoko Seki; Uhi Toh; Satoshi Hattori; Akihiko Kawahara; Tomohiko Yamaguchi; Keiko Koura; Ryuji Takahashi; Hiroko Otsuka; Hiroki Takahashi; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Shino Nakagawa; Teruhiko Fujii; Tetsuro Sasada; Rin Yamaguchi; Hirohisa Yano; Kazuo Shirouzu; Masayoshi Kage
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-26
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Mechanism of tumour microenvironment in the progression and development of oral cancer.

Authors:  Mohd Mughees; Anindita Sengupta; Sapna Khowal; Saima Wajid
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Overexpression of glucocorticoid receptor promotes the poor progression and induces cisplatin resistance through p38 MAP kinase in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Gwan Hee Han; Hee Yun; Julie Kim; Joon-Yong Chung; Jae-Hoon Kim; Hanbyoul Cho
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.942

Review 3.  Deciphering the Role of the Barr Body in Malignancy: An insight into head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Deepti Sharma; George Koshy; Shruti Gupta; Bhushan Sharma; Sonal Grover
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 4.  The prognostic role of tumor infiltrating T-lymphocytes in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma J de Ruiter; Marc L Ooft; Lot A Devriese; Stefan M Willems
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 5.  Perspectives of Immune Suppression in the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Oral Malignancy.

Authors:  Nobuo Kondoh; Masako Mizuno-Kamiya; Eiji Takayama; Harumi Kawati; Naoki Umemura; Yutaka Yamazaki; Kenji Mitsudo; Iwai Tohnai
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-06-20

6.  A comprehensive profile of TCF1+ progenitor and TCF1- terminally exhausted PD-1+CD8+ T cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Dikan Wang; Juan Fang; Shuqiong Wen; Qunxing Li; Jinming Wang; Lisa Yang; Wenxiao Dai; Huanzi Lu; Junyi Guo; Zhongyan Shan; Wenqiang Xie; Xiangqi Liu; Liling Wen; Jie Shen; Anxun Wang; Qianming Chen; Zhi Wang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.344

7.  Combination of the natural compound Periplocin and TRAIL induce esophageal squamous cell carcinoma apoptosis in vitro and in vivo: Implication in anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Lujuan Han; Suli Dai; Zhirong Li; Cong Zhang; Sisi Wei; Ruinian Zhao; Hongtao Zhang; Lianmei Zhao; Baoen Shan
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-21

8.  DNA hypermethylation of the promoter attenuates forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Zewei Lin; Xu Liu; Xiaoping Liu; Jikui Liu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.241

9.  FOXP3 expression in FOXP3+ tumor cells promotes hepatocellular cells metastasis.

Authors:  Henghui Zhang; Yanhui Chen; Weijia Liao; Li Wang; Xingwang Xie; Ran Fei; Xueyan Wang; Minghui Mei; Lai Wei; Hongsong Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.241

10.  Prognosis Value of Immunoregulatory Molecules in Oral Cancer Microenvironment: An Immunohistochemical Study.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Peña-Cardelles; José Juan Pozo-Kreilinger; Giovanna Roncador; Jesús Esteban-Hernández; José Ernesto Moro-Rodríguez; Ana Sastre-Perona; Beatriz Castelo-Fernández; José Luis Cebrián-Carretero
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.