Literature DB >> 27457243

Official government statistics of road traffic deaths in India under-represent pedestrians and motorised two wheeler riders.

Kavi Bhalla1, Nidhi Khurana1, Dipan Bose2, Kumari Vinodhani Navaratne3, Geetam Tiwari4, Dinesh Mohan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliable data on traffic deaths are important for planning road safety programmes and evaluating progress. Although pedestrians comprise approximately 40% of traffic deaths in low-income and middle-income countries, official government statistics in India suggest that pedestrians comprise less than 10% of deaths.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of official tabulations of traffic deaths among various road users in India.
METHOD: We reviewed police first information reports (FIRs) of traffic deaths in one district (Belgaum) in 2013 and 2014 and extracted information about crash victims. We validated the FIRs by linking with case files from four police stations in the district. Finally, we compared the information on types of road users killed based on FIRs with the district's official tabulations.
RESULTS: We found that the distribution of deaths by types of road users reported in official tabulations differed substantially from the underlying police reports. While official tabulations reported that only 9% of deaths in 2013 were pedestrians and 37% were riders of motorised two wheelers, FIRs showed that these groups accounted for 21% and 49% of deaths, respectively. DISCUSSION: Official tabulations of traffic deaths in India do not correctly represent the types of roads users killed. Until the Indian National Crime Records Bureau has corrected the process of generating statistical tabulations from police reports, data on the types of road users killed in India should not be used for research and policy. In the interim, researchers and policy makers who need such information should extract it from police case files. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457243     DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  2 in total

Review 1.  Potential for establishing an injury surveillance system in India: a review of data sources and reporting systems.

Authors:  Jagnoor Jagnoor; Manickam Ponnaiah; Matthew Varghese; Rebecca Ivers; Rajesh Kumar; Shankar Prinja; Aliki Christou; Tanu Jain
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Does spending matters? Re-looking into various covariates associated with Out of Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) and catastrophic spending on accidental injury from NSSO 71st round data.

Authors:  Jalandhar Pradhan; Rinshu Dwivedi; Sanghamitra Pati; Sarit Kumar Rout
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-12-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.