| Literature DB >> 27457129 |
Collins Okoyo1, Birgit Nikolay2, Jimmy Kihara3, Elses Simiyu3, Joshua V Garn4, Mathew C Freeman4, Mariam T Mwanje5, Dunstan A Mukoko5, Simon J Brooker2, Rachel L Pullan2, Sammy M Njenga3, Charles S Mwandawiro3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Kenyan Ministries of Health and of Education began a programme to deworm all school-age children living in areas at high risk of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and schistosome infections. The impact of this school-based mass drug administration (MDA) programme in Kenya is monitored by the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) as part of a five-year (2012-2017) study. This article focuses on the impact of MDA on STH infections and presents the overall achieved reductions from baseline to mid-term, as well as yearly patterns of reductions and subsequent re-infections per school community.Entities:
Keywords: Ascaris lumbricoides; Hookworms; School-based deworming; Trichuris trichiura
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27457129 PMCID: PMC4960809 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1679-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Number of schools (children) sampled in each region for each tier of monitoring
| Region | Baseline, mid-term & endterm | Pre-post | Totals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western | 42 (4536) | 18 (1944) | 60 (6480) |
| Rift Valley | 20 (2160) | 9 (972) | 29 (3132) |
| Coast | 37 (3996) | 15 (1620) | 52 (5616) |
| Nyanza | 41 (4428) | 18 (1944) | 59 (6372) |
| Totals | 140 (15,120) | 60 (6480) | 200 (21,600) |
Number of schools (children) examined in each survey
| County | Year 1 (2012) | Year 2 (2013) | Year 3 (2014) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Post-MDA | Pre-MDA | Post-MDA | Mid-term | Post-MDA | |
| Bomet | 12 (1296) | 3 (324) | 3 (313) | 3 (319) | 12 (1298) | 3 (313) |
| Bungomaa | 9 (968) | 2 (216) | 2 (215) | 2 (216) | 9 (935) | 2 (203) |
| Busia | 18 (1942) | 6 (648) | 6 (641) | 6 (643) | 18 (1927) | 6 (647) |
| Homa bay | 24 (2590) | 6 (642) | 6 (646) | 6 (634) | 24 (2483) | 6 (631) |
| Kakamega | 20 (2152) | 6 (648) | 6 (641) | 6 (644) | 20 (2086) | 6 (608) |
| Kericho | 12 (1292) | 3 (324) | 3 (312) | 3 (279) | 12 (1297) | 3 (295) |
| Kilifi | 10 (1080) | 3 (316) | 3 (324) | 3 (324) | 10 (1069) | 3 (315) |
| Kisii | 12 (1296) | 3 (324) | 3 (320) | 3 (318) | 12 (1265) | 3 (317) |
| Kisumu | 10 (1078) | 3 (324) | 3 (295) | 3 (313) | 10 (1032) | 3 (323) |
| Kwale | 18 (1940) | 6 (642) | 6 (648) | 6 (648) | 18 (1884) | 6 (563) |
| Migori | 8 (864) | 3 (226) | 3 (323) | 3 (314) | 8 (863) | 3 (314) |
| Mombasa | 8 (852) | 3 (313) | 3 (324) | 3 (324) | 8 (844) | 3 (311) |
| Narok | 10 (1070) | 3 (324) | 3 (322) | 3 (274) | 10 (1062) | 3 (311) |
| Nyamira | 10 (1080) | 3 (324) | 3 (321) | 3 (320) | 10 (1073) | 3 (313) |
| Taita Taveta | 10 (1072) | 3 (311) | 3 (318) | 3 (324) | 10 (1068) | 3 (322) |
| Vihiga | 8 (860) | 3 (324) | 3 (319) | 3 (320) | 8 (825) | 3 (311) |
| Total | 199 (21,432) | 59 (6230) | 59 (6282) | 59 (6214) | 199 (21,011) | 59 (6097) |
aone school was replaced in Bungoma County and was therefore excluded together with the replacement school
Overall prevalence (P, %), mean intensity (epg), relative reductions % (Wald test: Z-statistic, P-value) and absolute reductions % (Wald test: Z-statistic, P-value) of STHs: Baseline and mid-term
| Infection | Y1 baseline | Y3 mid-term | PRR % | ARP % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence | P % (95 % CI) | P% (95 % CI) | ( | ( |
| STH combined | 32.3 (30.0–34.8) | 16.4 (14.4–18.6) | 49.3 ( | 15.9 ( |
| Hookworms | 15.4 (13.6–17.6) | 2.3 (1.8–3.0) | 85.0 ( | 13.1 ( |
|
| 18.1 (15.8–20.7) | 11.9 (10.2–13.9) | 34.0 ( | 6.1 ( |
|
| 6.7 (5.4–8.2) | 4.5 (3.4–6.0) | 32.3 ( | 2.1 ( |
| Mean intensity | epg (95 % CI) | epg (95 % CI) | IRR % ( | |
| Hookworms | 63 (50–81) | 8 (5–14) | 87.1 ( | – |
|
| 1659 (1378–1998) | 960 (801–1151) | 42.1 ( | – |
|
| 33 (11–105) | 17 (11–26) | 49.5 ( | – |
Abbreviations: PRR relative reduction in prevalence, IRR relative reduction in mean intensity, ARP absolute reduction in prevalence
Fig. 1Observed geographical distribution of infection prevalence (%)
Fig. 2Observed geographical distribution of average infection intensity (epg)
Fig. 3Infections relative reductions (%) in prevalence and average intensity in Y1 pre-MDA and Y3 pre-MDA surveys
Prevalence of light, moderate and heavy mean intensity of infections [% (95 % CI)] in Y1 and Y3 and relative reductions % (Wald test: Z-statistic, P-value)
| Light | Moderate | Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STH combined | |||
| Y1 baseline | 23.6 (22.0–25.4) | 8.5 (7.2–10.1) | 0.2 (0.1–0.5) |
| Y3 mid-term | 10.6 (9.4–12.0) | 5.7 (4.8–6.9) | 0 (0–0.1) |
| Relative reduction (%) | 55.1 ( | 32.7 ( | 75.1 ( |
| Hookworms | |||
| Y1 baseline | 15.1 (13.3–17.2) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 0.1 (0–0.2) |
| Y3 mid-term | 2.2 (1.7–3.0) | 0 (0–0.1) | 0 (0–0.1) |
| Relative reduction | 85.2 ( | 86.9 ( | 61.7 ( |
|
| |||
| Y1 baseline | 9.8 (8.7–11.2) | 8.2 (6.9–9.8) | naa |
| Y3 mid-term | 6.5 (5.6–7.5) | 5.4 (4.5–6.5) | naa |
| Relative reduction | 34.1 ( | 33.9 ( | |
|
| |||
| Y1 baseline | 6.4 (5.2–7.8) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 0.1 (0–0.6) |
| Y3 mid-term | 4.2 (3.1–5.5) | 0.3 (0.2–0.6) | 0 |
| Relative reduction | 34.6 ( | Increase (58.4 %) ( | 94.0 ( |
a A. lumbricoides egg counts were truncated at 24,000 epg hence their heavy intensity of infection was not measured
Relative and absolute reduction, % (Wald test: Z-statistic, P-value), in prevalence and mean intensity of infection: Baseline to Y3 pre-MDA
| Infection | Relative reduction (%) | Relative reduction (%) | Relative reduction (%) | Absolute reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y1 to Y2 | Y2 to Y3 | Y1 to Y3 | Y1 to Y3 | |
| STH combined | ||||
| Prevalence reduction | 42.3 ( | 14.3 ( | 50.6 ( | 16.8 ( |
| Intensity Reduction | 36.6 ( | 15.7 ( | 46.6 ( | – |
| Hookworm | ||||
| Prevalence reduction | 72.6 ( | 45.8 ( | 85.2 ( | 14.0 ( |
| Intensity reduction | 71.7 ( | 66.3 ( | 90.4 ( | – |
|
| ||||
| Prevalence reduction | 35.2 ( | 1.0 (increase)a ( | 34.4 ( | 6.7 ( |
| Intensity reduction | 35.8 ( | 14.5 ( | 45.1 ( | – |
|
| ||||
| Prevalence reduction | 5.9 ( | 40.5 ( | 44.0 ( | 2.4 ( |
| Intensity reduction | 45.5 (increase)a ( | 44.3 ( | 19.0 ( | – |
aIndicates increase in prevalence or mean intensity rather than relative reduction
Absolute increase, % (Wald test: Z-statistic, P-value), in prevalence (PI) and mean intensity of infection (II): Re-infections between different rounds of MDA
| Infection | Y2 pre-MDA | Y3 pre-MDA | Y3 pre-MDA |
|---|---|---|---|
| STH combined | |||
| PI (%) | 13.9 ( | 11.1 ( | 12.5 ( |
| II (epg) | 616 ( | 504 ( | 524 ( |
| Hookworms | |||
| PI (%) | 3.8 ( | 2.3 ( | 2.8 ( |
| II (epg) | 12 ( | 5 ( | 7 ( |
|
| |||
| PI (%) | 7.4 ( | 7.2 ( | 7.5 ( |
| II (epg) | 590 ( | 493 ( | 507 ( |
|
| |||
| PI (%) | 4.7 ( | 2.8 ( | 3.7 ( |
| II (epg) | 13 ( | 6 ( | 10 ( |
Fig. 4Prevalence (%) of STH infections from Y1 pre-MDA to Y3 post-MDA
Fig. 5Average intensity (epg) of STH infections from Y1 pre-MDA to Y3 post-MDA
School treatment coverage (%) by county
| County | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total schools targeted | Schools treated (Coverage %) | Total schools targeted | Schools treated (Coverage %) | Total schools targeted | Schools treated (Coverage %) | |
| Overall | 12,060 | 11,416 (94.7) | 12,843 | 12,521 (97.5) | 13,740 | 13,585 (98.9) |
| Bomet | 1005 | 992 (98.7) | 851 | 879 (103.3) | 935 | 955 (102.1) |
| Bungoma | 1147 | 1067 (93.0) | 1208 | 1135 (94.0) | 1294 | 1310 (101.2) |
| Busia | 559 | 556 (99.5) | 598 | 567 (94.8) | 654 | 632 (96.6) |
| Homa Bay | 1264 | 1172 (92.7) | 1381 | 1361 (98.6) | 1430 | 1376 (96.2) |
| Kakamega | 1107 | 1067 (96.3) | 1215 | 1197 (98.5) | 1380 | 1365 (98.9) |
| Kericho | 587 | 561 (95.5) | 808 | 779 (96.4) | 858 | 862 (100.5) |
| Kilifi | 718 | 675 (94.0) | 758 | 712 (93.9) | 829 | 789 (95.2) |
| Kisii | 1415 | 1296 (91.6) | 1361 | 1348 (99.0) | 1411 | 1428 (101.2) |
| Kisumu | 794 | 794 (100) | 823 | 816 (99.1) | 866 | 861 (99.4) |
| Kwale | 475 | 466 (98.1) | 487 | 451 (92.6) | 506 | 511 (101.0) |
| Migori | 1004 | 982 (97.8) | 1107 | 1081 (97.7) | 1152 | 1150 (99.8) |
| Mombasa | 496 | 456 (91.9) | 585 | 589 (100.7) | 672 | 611 (90.9) |
| Narok | 263 | 256 (97.3) | 292 | 279 (95.5) | 297 | 303 (102.0) |
| Nyamira | 525 | 439 (83.6) | 682 | 637 (93.4) | 702 | 680 (96.9) |
| Taita Taveta | 237 | 217 (91.6) | 252 | 245 (97.2) | 272 | 270 (99.3) |
| Vihiga | 464 | 421 (90.7) | 435 | 445 (102.3) | 482 | 482 (100) |
Fig. 6Median school treatment coverage (%) by county for Y1, Y2 and Y3