Literature DB >> 27456447

Presentations to general practice before a cancer diagnosis in Victoria: a cross-sectional survey.

Karen Lacey1, James F Bishop2, Hannah L Cross2, Patty Chondros3, Georgios Lyratzopoulos4, Jon D Emery3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess variations in the number of general practitioner visits preceding a cancer diagnosis, and in the length of the interval between the patient first suspecting a problem and their seeing a hospital specialist. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of data provided to the Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES; survey response rate, 37.7%) by 1552 patients with one of 19 cancer types and treated in one of five Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre hospitals, 1 October 2012 - 30 April 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had had three or more GP consultations about cancer-related health problems before being referred to hospital. The secondary outcome was the interval between the patient first suspecting a problem and their seeing a hospital specialist.
RESULTS: 34% of the patients included in the final analyses (426 of 1248) had visited a GP at least three times before referral to a hospital doctor. The odds ratios (reference: rectal cancer; adjusted for age, sex, language spoken at home, and socio-economic disadvantage index score) varied according to cancer type, being highest for pancreatic cancer (3.2; 95% CI, 1.02-9.9), thyroid cancer (2.5; 95% CI, 0.9-6.6), vulval cancer (2.5; 95% CI, 0.7-8.7) and multiple myeloma (2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.5), and lowest for patients with breast cancer (0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8), cervical cancer (0.5; 95% CI, 0.1-2.1), endometrial cancer (0.5; 95% CI, 0.2-1.4) or melanoma (0.7; 95% CI, 0.3-1.5). Cancer type also affected the duration of the interval from symptom onset to seeing a hospital doctor; it took at least 3 months for more than one-third of patients with prostate or colon cancer to see a hospital doctor.
CONCLUSION: Certain cancer types were more frequently associated with multiple GP visits, suggesting they are more challenging to recognise early. In Victoria, longer intervals from the first symptoms to seeing a hospital doctor for colon or prostate cancer may reflect poorer community symptom awareness, later GP referral, or limited access to gastroenterology and urology services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27456447     DOI: 10.5694/mja15.01169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  11 in total

1.  Decision support tools to improve cancer diagnostic decision making in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sophie Chima; Jeanette C Reece; Kristi Milley; Shakira Milton; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors: a population-wide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Andrew C Ward; Karolina Lisy; Karen Lacey; Jon D Emery; Adam W Glaser; Hannah Cross; Mei Krishnasamy; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Jim Bishop
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Suspected cancer diagnoses made by general practitioners in a population with subsequently confirmed cancer diagnoses in Germany: a retrospective study of 31,628 patients.

Authors:  Karel Kostev; Uwe Meister; Matthias Kalder; Louis Jacob
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-14

4.  Pathways to diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer: a descriptive cohort study.

Authors:  Stuart Purdie; Nicola Creighton; Kahren Maree White; Deborah Baker; Dan Ewald; Chee Khoon Lee; Alison Lyon; Johnathan Man; David Michail; Alexis Andrew Miller; Lawrence Tan; David Currow; Jane M Young
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.871

5.  Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anne Nicolaisen; Gitte Bruun Lauridsen; Peter Haastrup; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.

Authors:  Saleh A Alessy; Mohammed Alhajji; Janette Rawlinson; Matthew Baker; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

7.  Healthcare use in the year preceding a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a register-based cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  Linda A Rasmussen; Line F Virgilsen; Claus W Fristrup; Peter Vedsted; Henry Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Optimization of a Quality Improvement Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sophie Chima; Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez; Barbara Hunter; Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis; Jon Emery
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-08-04

9.  Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Authors:  Bela Ines Laginha; Frances Rapport; Andrea Smith; David Wilkinson; Anne E Cust; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Diagnostic property of direct referral from general practitioners to contrast-enhanced thoracoabdominal CT in patients with serious but non-specific symptoms or signs of cancer: a retrospective cohort study on cancer prevalence after 12 months.

Authors:  Marie Møller; Bue Juvik; Stine Chabert Olesen; Hanne Sandstrøm; Erling Laxafoss; Simon Bertram Reuter; Uffe Bodtger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.