Tracey Ahern1, Anne Gardner2, Mary Courtney3. 1. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, PO Box 256, Dickson ACT 2602, Australia. Electronic address: traceyann.ahern@myacu.edu.au. 2. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, PO Box 256, Dickson ACT 2602, Australia. Electronic address: anne.gardner@acu.edu.au. 3. Australian Catholic University, PO Box 456, Virginia QLD 4014, Australia. Electronic address: mary@roverville.com.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study investigated whether use of services of a breast care nurse (BCN) at any time during treatment for breast cancer led to reduced unmet needs and increased self-efficacy among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to analyse comparisons between urban and rural and remote dwellers. METHOD: Participants were Australian women who completed treatment for breast cancer at least 6 months before the survey date, recruited through two national databases of women diagnosed with breast cancer. The cross-sectional online survey consisted of two well validated measures, the SCNS-SF34 and the CASE-Cancer Scale. Statistical data were analysed using SPSS, with chi-square used to measure statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 902 participants responded to the survey. Unmet needs in the psychological domain were most prominent. Respondents who used the services of a BCN were significantly less likely to report unmet needs regarding tiredness, anxiety; future outlook; feelings about death and dying; patient care and support from medical staff; and provision of health systems and information. Scores of self-efficacy showed women using the services of a BCN had significantly higher self-efficacy when seeking and obtaining information (ρ ≤ 0.001) and understanding and participating in care (ρ = 0.032). Urban dwellers were more likely to have choice of health care service, but overall neither unmet needs nor perceived self-efficacy varied statistically significantly by remoteness. CONCLUSIONS: Women with breast cancer experience a range of unmet needs; however those using BCN services demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of decreased unmet needs and increased self-efficacy.
PURPOSE: This study investigated whether use of services of a breast care nurse (BCN) at any time during treatment for breast cancer led to reduced unmet needs and increased self-efficacy among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to analyse comparisons between urban and rural and remote dwellers. METHOD:Participants were Australian women who completed treatment for breast cancer at least 6 months before the survey date, recruited through two national databases of women diagnosed with breast cancer. The cross-sectional online survey consisted of two well validated measures, the SCNS-SF34 and the CASE-Cancer Scale. Statistical data were analysed using SPSS, with chi-square used to measure statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 902 participants responded to the survey. Unmet needs in the psychological domain were most prominent. Respondents who used the services of a BCN were significantly less likely to report unmet needs regarding tiredness, anxiety; future outlook; feelings about death and dying; patient care and support from medical staff; and provision of health systems and information. Scores of self-efficacy showed women using the services of a BCN had significantly higher self-efficacy when seeking and obtaining information (ρ ≤ 0.001) and understanding and participating in care (ρ = 0.032). Urban dwellers were more likely to have choice of health care service, but overall neither unmet needs nor perceived self-efficacy varied statistically significantly by remoteness. CONCLUSIONS:Women with breast cancer experience a range of unmet needs; however those using BCN services demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of decreased unmet needs and increased self-efficacy.
Authors: Paramita Dasgupta; Peter D Baade; Danny R Youlden; Gail Garvey; Joanne F Aitken; Isabella Wallington; Jennifer Chynoweth; Helen Zorbas; Philippa H Youl Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Susanne Cruickshank; Emma Steel; Deborah Fenlon; Jo Armes; Elspeth Banks; Gerald Humphris Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Shannen R van der Kruk; Phyllis Butow; Ilse Mesters; Terry Boyle; Ian Olver; Kate White; Sabe Sabesan; Rob Zielinski; Bryan A Chan; Kristiaan Spronk; Peter Grimison; Craig Underhill; Laura Kirsten; Kate M Gunn Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-08-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Maria C Katapodi; Katrina R Ellis; Franziska Schmidt; Christos Nikolaidis; Laurel L Northouse Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.452