Literature DB >> 27456183

Evaluation of hospital-wide computerised decision support in an intensive care unit: an observational study.

W Santucci1, R O Day2, M T Baysari3.   

Abstract

We conducted an observational study with interviews in a 12-bed general/neurological intensive care unit (ICU) at a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, to determine whether hospital-wide computerised decision support (CDS) embedded in an electronic prescribing system is used and perceived as useful by doctors in an ICU setting. Twenty doctors were shadowed by the observer while on ward rounds (33.6 hours) and non-ward rounds (28 hours) in the ICU. These doctors were also interviewed to explore views of CDS. We found that computerised alerts were triggered frequently in the ICU (n=166, in 59% of orders), less than half of the alerts were read by doctors and only four alerts resulted in a medication order being changed. Pre-written orders were utilised frequently, however reference material was rarely accessed. Interviews with doctors revealed a willingness to use CDS features; however the primary barrier to use was lack of customisation for the ICU setting. Doctors working in the ICU triggered a high number of alerts when prescribing, 40% more alerts than doctors working on general wards of the same hospital. Certain procedures in place in the ICU (e.g. daily microbiology ward rounds) made many alerts redundant in this setting. Lack of customisation for the ICU led to dissatisfaction with CDS and infrequent use of some CDS features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical decision support systems; electronic prescribing; intensive care unit; interview; medication alert systems; observational study

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27456183     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1604400403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  2 in total

1.  How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Albert Farre; Gemma Heath; Karen Shaw; Danai Bem; Carole Cummins
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Challenges and Best Practices in Ethical Review of Human and Organizational Factors Studies in Health Technology: a Synthesis of Testimonies.

Authors:  Linda W Peute; Valentina Lichtner; Melissa T Baysari; Maria Hägglund; Juell Homco; Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink; Ignacio Jauregui; Johanna Kaipio; Craig E Kuziemsky; Elin Christina Lehnbom; Francisca Leite; Blake Lesselroth; Daniel Luna; Carlos Otero; Rune Pedersen; Sylvia Pelayo; Raquel Santos; Nuno-André Silva; Mari Tyllinen; Lex Van Velsen; Wu Yi Zheng; Monique Jaspers; Romaric Marcilly
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2020-04-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.