| Literature DB >> 27456167 |
Linee Goswami1, Sanjay Pratihar2, Suman Dasgupta3, Pradip Bhattacharyya4, Pronab Mudoi3, Jayanta Bora1, Satya Sundar Bhattacharya1, Ki Hyun Kim5.
Abstract
Metal contamination from coalEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27456167 PMCID: PMC4960643 DOI: 10.1038/srep30402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Changes in C/N ratio and compost respiration and during the period of biocomposting.
| Treatments | C:N ratio | Compost resp. (mg g−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 D | 30 D | 60 D | 0 D | 30 D | 60 D | |
| TFCA (only)(E1) | 4.76 ± 0.10 | 2.31 ± 0.19 | 1.07 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.08 | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 0.684 ± 0.11 |
| TFCA + CD (1:1)(E2) | 9.35 ± 0.89 | 3.21 ± 0.08 | 6.77 ± 0.15 | 1.09 ± 0.03 | 3.96 ± 0.2 | 4.245 ± 0.28 |
| TFCA + CD (1:2)(E3) | 11.24 ± 0.3 | 4.78 ± 0.56 | 3.21 ± 0.48 | 0.90 ± 0.03 | 3.95 ± 0.53 | 3.36 ± 0.21 |
| CD(E4) | 17.85 ± 1.9 | 4.14 ± 0.40 | 7.50 ± 0.26 | 1.01 ± 0.1 | 5.26 ± 0.26 | 4.30 ± 0.26 |
| TFCA(L1) | 7.85 ± 0.13 | 3.13 ± 0.13 | 3.68 ± 0.19 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.05 |
| TFCA + CD (1:1)(L2) | 9.64 ± 0.65 | 3.91 ± 0.14 | 2.5 ± 0.08 | 1.24 ± 0.2 | 3.03 ± 0.3 | 4.06 ± 0.2 |
| TFCA + CD (1:2)(L3) | 13.03 ± 0.7 | 4.18 ± 0.45 | 3.81 ± 0.13 | 1.37 ± 0.09 | 8.04 ± 0.81 | 7.55 ± 0.51 |
| CD(L4) | 18.57 ± 1.1 | 2.71 ± 0.08 | 12.43 ± 0.21 | 1.15 ± 0.15 | 6.56 ± 0.71 | 5.09 ± 0.74 |
| TFCA (only) (C1) | 8.26 ± 0.47 | 3.49 ± 0.07 | 3.6 ± 0.19 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.46 ± 0.055 | 0.56 ± 0.021 |
| TFCA + CD (1:1)(C2) | 7.28 ± 0.12 | 3.00 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.11 | 1.46 ± 0.2 | 2.47 ± 0.2 | 2.84 ± 0.264 |
| TFCA + CD (1:2) (C3) | 10.41 ± 0.8 | 7.07 ± 0.09 | 6.5 ± 0.31 | 1.18 ± 0.2 | 2.07 ± 0.42 | 3.63 ± 0.32 |
| CD (C4) | 16.21 ± 1.7 | 6.32 ± 0.04 | 5.8 ± 0.19 | 1.93 ± 0.1 | 2.69 ± 0.25 | 3.85 ± 0.21 |
| P value | ||||||
| Treatment | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
| Day | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
| Treatment × Day | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
| LSD | 1.444 | 0.017 | ||||
Changes in fulvic acid carbon (FAC), humic acid carbon (HAC), and degree of humification (DoH) during the period of biocomposting.
| Treatments | Fulvic Acid Carbon (FAC) (%) | Humic Acid Carbon (HAC) (%) | DoH | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 D | 30 D | 60 D | 0 D | 30 D | 60 D | 0 D | 30 D | 60 D | |
| TFCA (only)(E1) | 0.044 ± 0.01 | 0.023 ± 0.003 | 0.06 ± 0.002 | 0.22 ± 0.015 | 0.075 ± 0.006 | 0.07 ± 0.002 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 1.08 ± 0.03 | 1.28 ± 0.072 |
| TFCA + CD (1:1)(E2) | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.027 ± 0.003 | 0.07 ± 0.004 | 0.26 ± 0.015 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.021 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 2.01 ± 0.05 |
| TFCA + CD (1:2)(E3) | 0.62 ± 0.038 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 1.08 ± 0.036 | 0.25 ± 0.015 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 2.24 ± 0.06 | 2.06 ± 0.025 |
| CD(E4) | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.055 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.006 | 0.14 ± 0.021 | 0.32 ± 0.032 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 2.06 ± 0.02 | 2.82 ± 0.021 |
| TFCA(L1) | 0.024 ± 0.006 | 0.18 ± 0.025 | 0.32 ± 0.026 | 0.08 ± 0.006 | 0.015 ± 0.001 | 0.09 ± 0.007 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.02 | 1.65 ± 0.042 |
| TFCA + CD (1:1)(L2) | 0.024 ± 0.006 | 0.36 ± 0.095 | 0.64 ± 0.035 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.015 ± 0.003 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 1.95 ± 0.03 | 2.39 ± 0.065 |
| TFCA + CD (1:2)(L3) | 0.18 ± 0.021 | 0.61 ± 0.015 | 0.66 ± 0.026 | 0.30 ± 0.006 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.37 ± 0.030 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 2.23 ± 0.02 | 2.81 ± 0.017 |
| CD(L4) | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.88 ± 0.053 | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.025 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 2.53 ± 0.02 | 3.59 ± 0.042 |
| TFCA (only)(C1) | 0.23 ± 0.031 | 0.22 ± 0.025 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.006 | 0.045 ± 0.001 | 0.026 ± 0.001 | 0.20 ± 0.07 | 0.291 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.026 |
| TFCA + CD (1:1)(C2) | 0.08 ± 0.006 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.015 | 0.11 ± 0.006 | 0.23 ± 0.031 | 0.11 ± 0.007 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 1.30 ± 0.02 | 2.02 ± 0.047 |
| TFCA + CD (1:2) (C3) | 0.27 ± 0.035 | 0.69 ± 0.055 | 0.57 ± 0.031 | 0.21 ± 0.006 | 0.19 ± 0.017 | 0.11 ± 0.002 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 1.46 ± 0.04 | 2.06 ± 0.087 |
| CD(C4) | 0.29 ± 0.020 | 0.96 ± 0.062 | 0.56 ± 0.035 | 0.20 ± 0.006 | 0.23 ± 0.031 | 0.25 ± 0.002 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 2.32 ± 0.02 | 2.08 ± 0.025 |
| P value | |||||||||
| Treatment | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Day | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Treatment × Day | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||
| LSD | 0.303 | 0.12 | 0.16 | ||||||
Figure 1Temporal changes in various fractions of Cd, Cr, and Zn during composting and vermicomposting (mean ± standard deviation) with the LSD (the least significant deviation).
Figure 2Metal removal efficiency of the three bio-composting systems within 60 days.
Figure 3(A) Sephadex G-75 elution profile of Eisenia fetida and purified rabbit liver metallothionein (MT) [Eluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4), column size 25 × 1.5 cm, and flow rate 35 ml h−1]; and (B) Metallothionein content in Eisenia fetida and Lampito mauritii during vermicomposting with various Tea factory coal ash (TFCA) and cow dung (CD) mixtures (Error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates).
Figure 4(A) The fluorescence emission peaks of Cd and Zn-ligand complex treated (Treated CdL1 and Treated ZnL1) and untreated (control) earthworm gut protein (above 100 KDa); (B) The accumulation concentration (μM) of CdL1 and ZnL1 in <100 KDa and >100 KDa protein complexes in the earthworm intestines; and (C) Western Blot analysis of SDS-PAGE resolved earthworm protein (EP) using anti-EP antibody.
Figure 5(A) External morphological photographs of the treated Eisenia fetida specimens; (B) Histology of the intestine of Eisenia fetida treated with Cd (Cd L1) and Zn (Zn L1) complex compared to control specimen and (C); and Fluorescence microscopy of histological information of treated and untreated Eisenia fetida intestines.
|
|
| Aerobic composting system |
| E1- Only TFCA | L1- Only TFCA | C1- Only TFCA |
| E2- TFCA + CD (1:1) | L2- TFCA + CD (1:1) | C2- TFCA + CD (1:1) |
| E3- TFCA + CD (1:2) | L3- TFCA + CD (1:2) | C3- TFCA + CD (1:2) |
| E4- Only CD | L4- CD | C4- CD |
Figure 6Synthetic route of zinc (ZnL1) and cadmium (CdL1) complexes with the ligands.
Figure 7Emission spectra of ZnL1 and CdL1 complexes and relationship between their emission intensity versus concentration plot.