Literature DB >> 27456136

Anchorage failure of young trees in sandy soils is prevented by a rigid central part of the root system with various designs.

Antoine Danquechin Dorval1, Céline Meredieu1, Frédéric Danjon1.   

Abstract

Background and Aims Storms can cause huge damage to European forests. Even pole-stage trees with 80-cm rooting depth can topple. Therefore, good anchorage is needed for trees to survive and grow up from an early age. We hypothesized that root architecture is a predominant factor determining anchorage failure caused by strong winds. Methods We sampled 48 seeded or planted Pinus pinaster trees of similar aerial size from four stands damaged by a major storm 3 years before. The trees were gathered into three classes: undamaged, leaning and heavily toppled. After uprooting and 3D digitizing of their full root architectures, we computed the mechanical characteristics of the main components of the root system from our morphological measurements. Key Results Variability in root architecture was quite large. A large main taproot, either short and thick or long and thin, and guyed by a large volume of deep roots, was the major component that prevented stem leaning. Greater shallow root flexural stiffness mainly at the end of the zone of rapid taper on the windward side also prevented leaning. Toppling in less than 90-cm-deep soil was avoided in trees with a stocky taproots or with a very big leeward shallow root. Toppled trees also had a lower relative root biomass - stump excluded - than straight trees. Conclusions It was mainly the flexural stiffness of the central part of the root system that secured anchorage, preventing a weak displacement of the stump. The distal part of the longest taproot and attached deep roots may be the only parts of the root system contributing to anchorage through their maximum tensile load. Several designs provided good anchorage, depending partly on available soil depth. Pole-stage trees are in-between the juvenile phase when they fail by toppling and the mature phase when they fail by uprooting.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Pinus pinasterzzm321990 ; 3D root architecture; Windthrow; acclimation; biomechanics; flexural stiffness; forest tree; maximum tensile load; soil depth; toppling; tree anchorage

Year:  2016        PMID: 27456136      PMCID: PMC5055627          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  13 in total

Review 1.  Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny.

Authors:  Daniel Barthélémy; Yves Caraglio
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: a modelling approach.

Authors:  Thierry Fourcaud; Jin-Nan Ji; Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Alexia Stokes
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Heritabilities and genetic correlations for estimated growth curve parameters in maritime pine.

Authors:  F Danjon
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Mechanical stability of trees under dynamic loads.

Authors:  Kenneth R James; Nicholas Haritos; Peter K Ades
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Adaptive growth of tree root systems in response to wind action and site conditions.

Authors:  Bruce C. Nicoll; Duncan Ray
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Tree stability under wind: simulating uprooting with root breakage using a finite element method.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Pauline Défossez; Frédéric Danjon; Thierry Fourcaud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Effects of mechanical stress and plant density on mechanical characteristics, growth, and lifetime reproduction of tobacco plants.

Authors:  Niels P R Anten; Raquel Casado-Garcia; Hisae Nagashima
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Deep phenotyping of coarse root architecture in R. pseudoacacia reveals that tree root system plasticity is confined within its architectural model.

Authors:  Frédéric Danjon; Hayfa Khuder; Alexia Stokes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Jatropha curcas L. root structure and growth in diverse soils.

Authors:  Ofelia Andrea Valdés-Rodríguez; Odilón Sánchez-Sánchez; Arturo Pérez-Vázquez; Joshua S Caplan; Frédéric Danjon
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-06-05

10.  Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster.

Authors:  Frédéric Danjon; Joshua S Caplan; Mathieu Fortin; Céline Meredieu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reconstruction of root systems in Cryptomeria japonica using root point coordinates and diameters.

Authors:  Mizue Ohashi; Hidetoshi Ikeno; Kotaro Sekihara; Toko Tanikawa; Masako Dannoura; Keitaro Yamase; Chikage Todo; Takahiro Tomita; Yasuhiro Hirano
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Fertilization reduces root architecture plasticity in Ulmus pumila used for afforesting Mongolian semi-arid steppe.

Authors:  Antonio Montagnoli; Bruno Lasserre; Mattia Terzaghi; Ser-Oddamba Byambadorj; Batkhuu Nyam-Osor; Gabriella Stefania Scippa; Donato Chiatante
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.