Bertrand Pouymayou1,2, Tania Buehler1, Roland Kreis1, Chris Boesch1. 1. Department of Clinical Research and Department of Radiology, University of Bern, Switzerland. 2. Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A 31 P-MR inversion transfer (IT) method with a short adiabatic inversion pulse is proposed and its test-retest reliability was evaluated for two spectral fitting strategies. METHODS: Assessment in a test-retest design (3 Tesla, vastus muscles, 12 healthy volunteers, 14 inversion times, 22 ms asymmetric adiabatic inversion pulse, adiabatic excitation); spectral fitting in Fitting Tool for Interrelated Arrays of Datasets (FitAID) and Java Magnetic Resonance User Interface (jMRUI); least squares solution of the Bloch-McConnell-Solomon matrix formalism including all 14 measured time-points with equal weighting. RESULTS: The cohort averages of k[PCr→γ-ATP] (phosphocreatine, PCr; adenosine triphosphate, ATP) are 0.246 ± 0.050s-1 versus 0.254 ± 0.050s-1 , and k[Pi→γ-ATP] 0.086 ± 0.033s-1 versus 0.066 ± 0.034s-1 (average ± standard deviation, jMRUI versus FitAID). Coefficients of variation of the differences between test and retest are lowest (9.5%) for k[PCr→γ-ATP] fitted in FitAID, larger (15.2%) for the fit in jMRUI, and considerably larger for k[Pi→γ-ATP] fitted in FitAID (43.4%) or jMRUI (47.9%). The beginning of the IT effect can be observed with magnetizations above 92% for noninverted lines while inversion of the ATP resonances is better than -72%. CONCLUSION: The performance of the asymmetric adiabatic pulse allows an accurate observation of IT effects even in the early phase; the least squares fit of the Bloch-McConnell-Solomon matrix formalism is robust; and the type of spectral fitting can influence the results significantly. Magn Reson Med 78:33-39, 2017.
PURPOSE: A 31 P-MR inversion transfer (IT) method with a short adiabatic inversion pulse is proposed and its test-retest reliability was evaluated for two spectral fitting strategies. METHODS: Assessment in a test-retest design (3 Tesla, vastus muscles, 12 healthy volunteers, 14 inversion times, 22 ms asymmetric adiabatic inversion pulse, adiabatic excitation); spectral fitting in Fitting Tool for Interrelated Arrays of Datasets (FitAID) and Java Magnetic Resonance User Interface (jMRUI); least squares solution of the Bloch-McConnell-Solomon matrix formalism including all 14 measured time-points with equal weighting. RESULTS: The cohort averages of k[PCr→γ-ATP] (phosphocreatine, PCr; adenosine triphosphate, ATP) are 0.246 ± 0.050s-1 versus 0.254 ± 0.050s-1 , and k[Pi→γ-ATP] 0.086 ± 0.033s-1 versus 0.066 ± 0.034s-1 (average ± standard deviation, jMRUI versus FitAID). Coefficients of variation of the differences between test and retest are lowest (9.5%) for k[PCr→γ-ATP] fitted in FitAID, larger (15.2%) for the fit in jMRUI, and considerably larger for k[Pi→γ-ATP] fitted in FitAID (43.4%) or jMRUI (47.9%). The beginning of the IT effect can be observed with magnetizations above 92% for noninverted lines while inversion of the ATP resonances is better than -72%. CONCLUSION: The performance of the asymmetric adiabatic pulse allows an accurate observation of IT effects even in the early phase; the least squares fit of the Bloch-McConnell-Solomon matrix formalism is robust; and the type of spectral fitting can influence the results significantly. Magn Reson Med 78:33-39, 2017.
Authors: Martin Meyerspeer; Chris Boesch; Donnie Cameron; Monika Dezortová; Sean C Forbes; Arend Heerschap; Jeroen A L Jeneson; Hermien E Kan; Jane Kent; Gwenaël Layec; Jeanine J Prompers; Harmen Reyngoudt; Alison Sleigh; Ladislav Valkovič; Graham J Kemp Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 4.044