H Tavakoli1,2,3, J M FitzGerald1,2, W Chen1, L Lynd1, T Kendzerska4, S Aaron5, A Gershon6,7, C Marra8, M Sadatsafavi1,2,3. 1. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, Institute for Heart and Lung Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 4. The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 6. The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 8. School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is little information on recent trends in the economic burden of asthma. Our objective was to estimate the excess costs of asthma and their trend in British Columbia, Canada, from 2002 to 2011. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of individuals aged 5-55 years was constructed from the provincial administrative health databases, consisting of patients with physician-diagnosed asthma and a propensity-score-matched comparison sample from the general population. Total direct medical costs were calculated as the sum of hospitalizations, outpatient visits and medication costs, adjusted to 2012 Canadian dollars ($). Excess costs were defined as the difference in costs between the asthma and comparison groups. RESULTS: A total of 341 457 individuals (mean age at entry 27.3, 54.1% female) were equally divided into the asthma and comparison groups. Excess costs in patients with asthma were $1028.0 (95% CI $982.7-$1073.4) per patient-year (PY). Medications contributed to the greatest share of excess costs ($471.7/PY), whereas hospitalization and outpatient costs were, respectively, $272.2/PY and $284.1/PY. Only $192.9/PY was attributable to asthma itself. There was a 2.9%/year increase in excess costs (P < 0.001), a combination of asthma-attributable costs declining by 0.8%/year while nonasthma excess costs increasing by 3.8%/year. The most dramatic trend was observed in asthma-related outpatient costs, which decreased by %6.6/year. CONCLUSIONS: A significant share of excess costs in asthma is not attributable to the disease itself. The pattern of costs changed significantly during the study period. The burden of comorbid conditions should be considered in developing evidence-based policies for management of patients with asthma.
INTRODUCTION: There is little information on recent trends in the economic burden of asthma. Our objective was to estimate the excess costs of asthma and their trend in British Columbia, Canada, from 2002 to 2011. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of individuals aged 5-55 years was constructed from the provincial administrative health databases, consisting of patients with physician-diagnosed asthma and a propensity-score-matched comparison sample from the general population. Total direct medical costs were calculated as the sum of hospitalizations, outpatient visits and medication costs, adjusted to 2012 Canadian dollars ($). Excess costs were defined as the difference in costs between the asthma and comparison groups. RESULTS: A total of 341 457 individuals (mean age at entry 27.3, 54.1% female) were equally divided into the asthma and comparison groups. Excess costs in patients with asthma were $1028.0 (95% CI $982.7-$1073.4) per patient-year (PY). Medications contributed to the greatest share of excess costs ($471.7/PY), whereas hospitalization and outpatient costs were, respectively, $272.2/PY and $284.1/PY. Only $192.9/PY was attributable to asthma itself. There was a 2.9%/year increase in excess costs (P < 0.001), a combination of asthma-attributable costs declining by 0.8%/year while nonasthma excess costs increasing by 3.8%/year. The most dramatic trend was observed in asthma-related outpatient costs, which decreased by %6.6/year. CONCLUSIONS: A significant share of excess costs in asthma is not attributable to the disease itself. The pattern of costs changed significantly during the study period. The burden of comorbid conditions should be considered in developing evidence-based policies for management of patients with asthma.
Authors: Carlos Gamazo; Carmen D'Amelio; Gabriel Gastaminza; Marta Ferrer; Juan M Irache Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: J Bousquet; C A Akdis; C Grattan; P A Eigenmann; K Hoffmann-Sommergruber; P W Hellings; I Agache Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Mohammad Romel Bhuia; Md Atiqul Islam; Bright I Nwaru; Christopher J Weir; Aziz Sheikh Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 4.413
Authors: Ricardo Cardona-Villa; Susana Uribe-Garcia; Víctor Daniel Calvo-Betancur; Jose Fernando Cantillo; Enrique Fernández-Caldas Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 5.516
Authors: Cecilia Sierra-Heredia; Michelle North; Jeff Brook; Christina Daly; Anne K Ellis; Dave Henderson; Sarah B Henderson; Éric Lavigne; Tim K Takaro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Heimo Breiteneder; Zuzana Diamant; Thomas Eiwegger; Wytske J Fokkens; Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann; Kari Nadeau; Robyn E O'Hehir; Liam O'Mahony; Oliver Pfaar; Maria J Torres; De Yun Wang; Luo Zhang; Cezmi A Akdis Journal: Allergy Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 13.146