Literature DB >> 27455155

Teres Ligament Patch Reduces Relevant Morbidity After Distal Pancreatectomy (the DISCOVER Randomized Controlled Trial).

Matthias Hassenpflug1, Ulf Hinz, Oliver Strobel, Johanna Volpert, Philip Knebel, Markus K Diener, Colette Doerr-Harim, Jens Werner, Thilo Hackert, Markus W Büchler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of teres ligament covering on pancreatic fistula rate after distal pancreatectomy (DP).
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) represents the most significant complication after DP. Retrospective studies suggested a benefit of covering the resection margin by a teres ligament patch.
METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study (DISCOVER trial) included 152 patients undergoing DP, between October 2010 and July 2014. Patients were randomized to undergo closure of the pancreatic cut margin without (control, n = 76) or with teres ligament coverage (teres, n = 76). The primary endpoint was the rate of POPF, and the secondary endpoints included postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate.
RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding epidemiology (age, sex, body mass index), operative parameters (operation time [OP] time, blood loss, method of pancreas transection, additional operative procedures), and histopathological findings. Overall inhospital mortality was 0.6% (1/152 patients). In the group of patients with teres ligament patch, the rate of reoperations (1.3% vs 13.0%; P = 0.009), and also the rate of readmission (13.1 vs 31.5%; P = 0.011) were significantly lower. Clinically relevant POPF rate (grade B/C) was 32.9% (control) versus 22.4% (teres, P = 0.20). Multivariable analysis showed teres ligament coverage to be a protective factor for clinically relevant POPF (P = 0.0146).
CONCLUSIONS: Coverage of the pancreatic remnant after DP is associated with less reinterventions, reoperations, and need for readmission. Although the overall fistula rate is not reduced by the coverage procedure, it should be considered as a valid measure for complication prevention due to its clinical benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27455155     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

1.  Pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is probably unrelated to the stapler size but to the drainage modality and significantly decreased with a small suction drain.

Authors:  Safi Dokmak; Fadhel Samir Ftériche; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Béatrice Aussilhou; Igor Duquesne; Genaro Perrone; Chihebeddine Romdhani; Jacques Belghiti; Philippe Lévy; Olivier Soubrane; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Drain Contamination after Distal Pancreatectomy: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Association with Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Chen Jin; Sijie Hao; Deliang Fu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  [Closure of pancreas stump after distal and segmental resection : Suture, stapler, coverage or anastomosis?]

Authors:  C W Michalski; P Tramelli; M W Büchler; T Hackert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Visceral Obesity and Open Passive Drainage Increase the Risk of Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Charles Vanbrugghe; Maxime Ronot; François Cauchy; Christian Hobeika; Safi Dokmak; Béatrice Aussilhou; Emilia Ragot; Sébastien Gaujoux; Olivier Soubrane; Philippe Lévy; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Modifications in the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Alessandra Pulvirenti; Marco Ramera; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-12

6.  A randomized controlled trial of stapled versus ultrasonic transection in distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Luca Landoni; Matteo De Pastena; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Martina Fontana; Giuseppe Malleo; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Casetti; Giovanni Marchegiani; Massimiliano Tuveri; Salvatore Paiella; Antonio Pea; Marco Ramera; Alex Borin; Alessandro Giardino; Isabella Frigerio; Roberto Girelli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Surgical Outcomes Following Early Drain Removal After Distal Pancreatectomy in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Teruhisa Sakamoto; Yakuki Yagyu; E I Uchinaka; Takehiko Hanaki; Kozo Miyatani; Kyoichi Kihara; Manabu Yamamoto; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Naruo Tokuyasu; Soichiro Honjo; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Computer tomographic assessment of postoperative peripancreatic collections after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yuichiro Uchida; Toshihiko Masui; Asahi Sato; Kazuyuki Nagai; Takayuki Anazawa; Kyoichi Takaori; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Modified Reinforced Staple Closure Technique Decreases Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ryoichi Miyamoto; Naoki Sano; Michihiro Maeda; Satoshi Inagawa; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-13

Review 10.  Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Strobel; John Neoptolemos; Dirk Jäger; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.