Literature DB >> 274548

An evaluation of facial prostheses.

R M Jani, N G Schaaf.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted to evaluate patient reactions to facial prostheses that were provided to 143 patients in the past 7 years at Roswell Park Memorial Institute. Of the 76 patients who responded, 38 patients were wearing their prostheses and 38 patients were not wearing their prostheses. Reasons cited by the patients for not using their prosthesis included lack of retention, additional surgery, discomfort, and irritation. Most of the prostheses were prepared in silicone rubber with color characterization accomplished by the tattooing method. More than 69% of the prostheses were remade within a year because of rapid changes in the defect, prosthesis material, or prosthesis color. The study revealed the need for improvement in materials, adhesive techniques, and the psychological orientation of the patient. This project was conducted at a teaching and research institute. No fees for the patients were required. Therefore our data might differ from that collected from a private practice or clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 274548     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(78)80191-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  13 in total

1.  Effects of outdoor weathering on facial prosthetic elastomers.

Authors:  Panagiota N Eleni; Magdalini Krokida; Gregory Polyzois; Lawrence Gettleman; Gasan I Bisharat
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Reconstruction of Exenterated Orbit using Combined Surgical and Prosthetic Approach.

Authors:  D R Prithviraj; Anish Gupta; Sumit Khare; Pooja Garg; Malesh Pujari
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-05-15

3.  Finger prosthesis: a boon to handicapped.

Authors:  Ridhima Gupta; Lakshya Kumar; Jitendra Rao; Kamleshwar Singh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-29

4.  The effect of accelerated ageing on performance properties of addition type silicone biomaterials.

Authors:  K Stathi; P A Tarantili; G Polyzois
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Partial Ear Defect: 2 Case Reports.

Authors:  Meryem Gülce Subaşı; Gamze Alnıaçık; Abdullah Kalaycı; Serhan Akman; Ercan Durmuş
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-01-06

6.  Evaluation of Shore A hardness of maxillofacial silicones: the effect of dark storage and nanoparticles.

Authors:  Pınar Çevik
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2018-05-01

7.  Rehabilitation of amputed thumb with a silicone prosthesis.

Authors:  Pooja Asnani; Chandu Giriyapura Shivalingappa; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Kirti Somkuwar; Faisal Khan
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

8.  Reconstruction of a midfacial defect using an intraoral-extraoral combination prosthesis employing magnets: a clinical report.

Authors:  Anoop Nair; K M Regish; Farhan K Shah; D R Prithviraj
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2012-07-01

9.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of an orbital defect for a patient with hemifacial atrophy.

Authors:  Sanath Shetty; Fahad Mohammad; Rajesh Shetty; Kamalakanth Shenoy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Evaluation of the effect of ultraviolet stabilizers on the change in color of pigmented silicone elastomer: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mohit Kheur; Tania Sethi; Trevor Coward; Dilip Kakade; M Rajkumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.