Literature DB >> 27454550

Real-time arrhythmia detection with supplementary ECG quality and pulse wave monitoring for the reduction of false alarms in ICUs.

Vessela Krasteva1, Irena Jekova, Remo Leber, Ramun Schmid, Roger Abächerli.   

Abstract

False intensive care unit (ICU) alarms induce stress in both patients and clinical staff and decrease the quality of care, thus significantly increasing both the hospital recovery time and rehospitalization rates. In the PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2015 for reducing false arrhythmia alarms in ICU bedside monitor data, this paper validates the application of a real-time arrhythmia detection library (ADLib, Schiller AG) for the robust detection of five types of life-threatening arrhythmia alarms. The strength of the application is to give immediate feedback on the arrhythmia event within a scan interval of 3 s-7.5 s, and to increase the noise immunity of electrocardiogram (ECG) arrhythmia analysis by fusing its decision with supplementary ECG quality interpretation and real-time pulse wave monitoring (quality and hemodynamics) using arterial blood pressure or photoplethysmographic signals. We achieved the third-ranked real-time score (79.41) in the challenge (Event 1), however, the rank was not officially recognized due to the 'closed-source' entry. This study shows the optimization of the alarm decision module, using tunable parameters such as the scan interval, lead quality threshold, and pulse wave features, with a follow-up improvement of the real-time score (80.07). The performance (true positive rate, true negative rate) is reported in the blinded challenge test set for different arrhythmias: asystole (83%, 96%), extreme bradycardia (100%, 90%), extreme tachycardia (98%, 80%), ventricular tachycardia (84%, 82%), and ventricular fibrillation (78%, 84%). Another part of this study considers the validation of ADLib with four reference ECG databases (AHA, EDB, SVDB, MIT-BIH) according to the international recommendations for performance reports in ECG monitors (ANSI/AAMI EC57). The sensitivity (Se) and positive predictivity (+P) are: QRS detector QRS (Se, +P)  >  99.7%, ventricular ectopic beat (VEB) classifier VEB (Se, +P)  =  95%, and ventricular fibrillation detector VFIB (P  +  = 94.8%)  >  VFIB (Se  =  86.4%), adjusted to the clinical setting requirements, giving preference to low false positive alarms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27454550     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/8/1273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  4 in total

1.  Detection of Common Arrhythmias by the Watch-PAT: Expression of Electrical Arrhythmias by Pulse Recording.

Authors:  Giora Pillar; Murray Berall; Richard B Berry; Tamar Etzioni; Yaakov Henkin; Dennis Hwang; Ibrahim Marai; Faheem Shehadeh; Prasanth Manthena; Anil Rama; Rebecca Spiegel; Thomas Penzel; Riva Tauman
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2022-04-21

2.  False alarm reduction in critical care.

Authors:  Gari D Clifford; Ikaro Silva; Benjamin Moody; Qiao Li; Danesh Kella; Abdullah Chahin; Tristan Kooistra; Diane Perry; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Implementation and Operational Analysis of an Interactive Intensive Care Unit within a Smart Health Context.

Authors:  Peio Lopez-Iturri; Erik Aguirre; Jesús Daniel Trigo; José Javier Astrain; Leyre Azpilicueta; Luis Serrano; Jesús Villadangos; Francisco Falcone
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  A novel method to quantify arterial pulse waveform morphology: attractor reconstruction for physiologists and clinicians.

Authors:  Manasi Nandi; Jenny Venton; Philip J Aston
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.833

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.