| Literature DB >> 27454527 |
Alexandra Irrgang1, Nicole Roschanski2, Bernd-Alois Tenhagen1, Mirjam Grobbel1, Tanja Skladnikiewicz-Ziemer1, Katharina Thomas1, Uwe Roesler2, Annemarie Käsbohrer1.
Abstract
Since the first description of a plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene (mcr-1) in November 2015 multiple reports of mcr-1 positive isolates indicate a worldwide spread of this newly discovered resistance gene in Enterobacteriaceae. Although the occurrence of mcr-1 positive isolates of livestock, food, environment and human origin is well documented only few systematic studies on the prevalence of mcr-1 are available yet. Here, comprehensive data on the prevalence of mcr-1 in German livestock and food isolates are presented. Over 10.600 E. coli isolates from the national monitoring on zoonotic agents from the years 2010-2015 were screened for phenotypic colistin resistance (MIC value >2 mg/l). Of those, 505 resistant isolates were screened with a newly developed TaqMan-based real-time PCR for the presence of the mcr-1 gene. In total 402 isolates (79.8% of colistin resistant isolates) harboured the mcr-1 gene. The prevalence was depending on the food production chain. The highest prevalence was detected in the turkey food chain (10.7%), followed by broilers (5.6%). A low prevalence was determined in pigs, veal calves and laying hens. The mcr-1 was not detected in beef cattle, beef and dairy products in all years investigated. In conclusion, TaqMan based real-time PCR provides a fast and accurate tool for detection of mcr-1 gene. The overall detection rate of 3.8% for mcr-1 among all E. coli isolates tested is due to high prevalence of mcr-1 in poultry production chains. More epidemiological studies of other European countries are urgently needed to assess German prevalence data.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27454527 PMCID: PMC4959773 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Validation of the real-time PCR assay.
For the assay validation ten positive (P1-10) as well as ten negative (N1-10) control strains were used. The runs were performed in three technical replicates and the mean Ct values as well as the resultant (standard deviation) are indicated.
| Sample | Roche LightCycler 480 II | BioRad CFX 96 |
|---|---|---|
| none | none | |
| none | none | |
| 13.80 (0.29) | 17.36 (0) | |
| 18.83 (0.67) | 21.10 (0.33) | |
| 14.92 (0.17) | 17.95 (0.70) | |
| 15.81 (0.09) | 18.16 (0.24) | |
| 16.51 (0.07) | 19.78 (0.24) | |
| 15.52 (0.47) | 18.25 (0.31) | |
| 13.61 (0.23) | 18.42 (0.08) | |
| 14.23 (0.36) | 18.09 (0.12) | |
| 15.08 (0.19) | 18.21 (0.17) | |
| 15.61 (0.30) | 19.08 (0.24) | |
NTC = No Template Control
Prevalence of mcr-1 in German livestock and food samples 2010–2015.
| Sample origin | Year | Matrices | No. of isolates investigated | No. of colistin resistant isolates | No. of | Prevalence | Prevalence colistin resistance | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laying hens | 2010 | 802 | 9 | 0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | |
| 2011 | 642 | 13 | 2 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 15.4 | ||
| 2014 | 351 | 2 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 50.0 | ||
| Eggs | 2014 | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 0.0 | |
| Broilers | at farm, faeces | 147 | 8 | 8 | 5.4 | 100.0 | ||
| at farm, faeces | 246 | 18 | 17 | 7.3 | 94.4 | |||
| all | 667 | 57 | 52 | 8.5 | 91.2 | |||
| at farm, faeces | 161 | 4 | 4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 100.0 | ||
| at slaughter, caeca | 273 | 27 | 24 | 8.8 | 9.9 | 88.9 | ||
| at slaughter, carcass | 233 | 26 | 24 | 10.3 | 11.2 | 92.3 | ||
| all | 414 | 25 | 22 | 6.0 | 88.0 | |||
| at farm, faeces | 184 | 9 | 8 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 88.9 | ||
| at slaughter, caeca | 230 | 16 | 14 | 6.1 | 7.0 | 87.5 | ||
| Chicken meat | 2011 | 172 | 16 | 14 | 8.1 | 9.3 | 87.5 | |
| 2013 | 207 | 13 | 10 | 4.8 | 6.3 | 76.9 | ||
| 2014 | 201 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 50.0 | ||
| Turkey | all | 381 | 46 | 39 | 12.1 | 84.8 | ||
| at farm, faeces | 107 | 14 | 14 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 100.0 | ||
| at slaughter, caeca | 274 | 32 | 25 | 9.1 | 11.7 | 78.1 | ||
| at farm, faeces | 184 | 37 | 33 | 20.1 | 89.2 | |||
| all | 537 | 68 | 63 | 12.7 | 92.6 | |||
| at farm, faeces | 205 | 36 | 33 | 16.1 | 17.6 | 91.7 | ||
| at slaughter, caeca | 332 | 32 | 30 | 9.0 | 9.6 | 93.8 | ||
| all | 357 | 39 | 37 | 10.9 | 94.9 | |||
| at farm, faeces | 173 | 30 | 30 | 17.3 | 17.3 | 100.0 | ||
| at slaughter, caeca | 184 | 9 | 7 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 77.8 | ||
| Turkey meat | 2010 | 181 | 19 | 17 | 9.4 | 10.5 | 89.5 | |
| 2012 | 307 | 32 | 30 | 9.8 | 10.4 | 93.8 | ||
| 2014 | 188 | 11 | 10 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 90.9 | ||
| Beef cattle | 2011 | at farm, faeces | 909 | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | faeces and colon content | 526 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | |
| Beef | 2011 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | |
| 2013 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | ||
| 2015 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | ||
| Dairy products | 2010 | bulk tank milk | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - |
| 2011 | cheese | 76 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | |
| 2014 | bulk tank milk | 196 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |
| Veal calves | at farm, faeces | 165 | 22 | 15 | 13.3 | 68.2 | ||
| all | 515 | 6 | 5 | 1.2 | 83.3 | |||
| at farm, faeces | 217 | 2 | 2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 100.0 | ||
| at slaughter, colon content | 298 | 4 | 3 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 75.0 | ||
| at slaughter, colon content | 185 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 100.0 | |||
| Veal | 2012 | 70 | 4 | 1 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 25.0 | |
| Pig | at farm, faeces, fattening pigs | 859 | 31 | 13 | 3.6 | 41.9 | ||
| all | 730 | 15 | 11 | 2.1 | 73.3 | |||
| at farm, faeces, breeding pigs and piglets | 512 | 15 | 11 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 73.3 | ||
| at slaughter, fattening pigs, colon content | 218 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | ||
| Pork | 2011 | 52 | 1 | n.d. | - | 1.9 | - | |
| 2015 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | ||
n.d. not determined;—can’t be calculated