Literature DB >> 27454455

High-throughput metabarcoding of eukaryotic diversity for environmental monitoring of offshore oil-drilling activities.

Anders Lanzén1, Katrine Lekang2, Inge Jonassen3, Eric M Thompson2,4,5, Christofer Troedsson5.   

Abstract

As global exploitation of available resources increases, operations extend towards sensitive and previously protected ecosystems. It is important to monitor such areas in order to detect, understand and remediate environmental responses to stressors. The natural heterogeneity and complexity of communities means that accurate monitoring requires high resolution, both temporally and spatially, as well as more complete assessments of taxa. Increased resolution and taxonomic coverage is economically challenging using current microscopy-based monitoring practices. Alternatively, DNA sequencing-based methods have been suggested for cost-efficient monitoring, offering additional insights into ecosystem function and disturbance. Here, we applied DNA metabarcoding of eukaryotic communities in marine sediments, in areas of offshore drilling on the Norwegian continental shelf. Forty-five samples, collected from seven drilling sites in the Troll/Oseberg region, were assessed, using the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene as a taxonomic marker. In agreement with results based on classical morphology-based monitoring, we were able to identify changes in sediment communities surrounding oil platforms. In addition to overall changes in community structure, we identified several potential indicator taxa, responding to pollutants associated with drilling fluids. These included the metazoan orders Macrodasyida, Macrostomida and Ceriantharia, as well as several ciliates and other protist taxa, typically not targeted by environmental monitoring programmes. Analysis of a co-occurrence network to study the distribution of taxa across samples provided a framework for better understanding the impact of anthropogenic activities on the benthic food web, generating novel, testable hypotheses of trophic interactions structuring benthic communities.
© 2016 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA barcoding; bioinformatics/phyloinformatics; foodwebs; microbial biology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27454455     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  10 in total

1.  Quantification of marine benthic communities with metabarcoding.

Authors:  Lise Klunder; Judith D L van Bleijswijk; Loran Kleine Schaars; Henk W van der Veer; Pieternella C Luttikhuizen; Allert I Bijleveld
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 8.678

2.  DNA extraction replicates improve diversity and compositional dissimilarity in metabarcoding of eukaryotes in marine sediments.

Authors:  Anders Lanzén; Katrine Lekang; Inge Jonassen; Eric M Thompson; Christofer Troedsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Metabarcoding monitoring analysis: the pros and cons of using co-extracted environmental DNA and RNA data to assess offshore oil production impacts on benthic communities.

Authors:  Olivier Laroche; Susanna A Wood; Louis A Tremblay; Gavin Lear; Joanne I Ellis; Xavier Pochon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  The marker choice: Unexpected resolving power of an unexplored CO1 region for layered DNA barcoding approaches.

Authors:  Jessica Rach; Tjard Bergmann; Omid Paknia; Rob DeSalle; Bernd Schierwater; Heike Hadrys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Can non-destructive DNA extraction of bulk invertebrate samples be used for metabarcoding?

Authors:  Melissa E Carew; Rhys A Coleman; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Environmental DNA and RNA as Records of Human Exposome, Including Biotic/Abiotic Exposures and Its Implications in the Assessment of the Role of Environment in Chronic Diseases.

Authors:  Indu Shekhar Thakur; Deodutta Roy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Metabarcoding of harmful algal bloom species in sediments from four coastal areas of the southeast China.

Authors:  Zhaohui Wang; Liang Peng; Changliang Xie; Wenting Wang; Yuning Zhang; Lijuan Xiao; Yali Tang; Yufeng Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Grab what you can-an evaluation of spatial replication to decrease heterogeneity in sediment eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Jon T Hestetun; Anders Lanzén; Thomas G Dahlgren
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Sample size effects on the assessment of eukaryotic diversity and community structure in aquatic sediments using high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Francisco J A Nascimento; Delphine Lallias; Holly M Bik; Simon Creer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Characterization of ecto- and endoparasite communities of wild Mediterranean teleosts by a metabarcoding approach.

Authors:  Mathilde Scheifler; Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez; Sophie Sanchez-Brosseau; Elodie Magnanou; Marcelino T Suzuki; Nyree West; Sébastien Duperron; Yves Desdevises
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.