Literature DB >> 27454128

Reduction of false arrhythmia alarms using signal selection and machine learning.

Linda M Eerikäinen1, Joaquin Vanschoren, Michael J Rooijakkers, Rik Vullings, Ronald M Aarts.   

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an algorithm that classifies whether a generated cardiac arrhythmia alarm is true or false. The large number of false alarms in intensive care is a severe issue. The noise peaks caused by alarms can be high and in a noisy environment nurses can experience stress and fatigue. In addition, patient safety is compromised because reaction time of the caregivers to true alarms is reduced. The data for the algorithm development consisted of records of electrocardiogram (ECG), arterial blood pressure, and photoplethysmogram signals in which an alarm for either asystole, extreme bradycardia, extreme tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or flutter, or ventricular tachycardia occurs. First, heart beats are extracted from every signal. Next, the algorithm selects the most reliable signal pair from the available signals by comparing how well the detected beats match between different signals based on [Formula: see text]-score and selecting the best match. From the selected signal pair, arrhythmia specific features, such as heart rate features and signal purity index are computed for the alarm classification. The classification is performed with five separate Random Forest models. In addition, information on the local noise level of the selected ECG lead is added to the classification. The algorithm was trained and evaluated with the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2015 data set. In the test set the overall true positive rates were 93 and 95% and true negative rates 80 and 83%, respectively for events with no information and events with information after the alarm. The overall challenge scores were 77.39 and 81.58.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27454128     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/8/1204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  18 in total

1.  Machine learning applied to multi-sensor information to reduce false alarm rate in the ICU.

Authors:  Gal Hever; Liel Cohen; Michael F O'Connor; Idit Matot; Boaz Lerner; Yuval Bitan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Generalizability of SuperAlarm via Cross-Institutional Performance Evaluation.

Authors:  Ran Xiao; Duc Do; Cheng Ding; Karl Meisel; Randall Lee; Xiao Hu
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Representation Learning Approaches to Detect False Arrhythmia Alarms from ECG Dynamics.

Authors:  Eric P Lehman; Rahul G Krishnan; Xiaopeng Zhao; Roger G Mark; Li-Wei H Lehman
Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  Opportunities for machine learning to improve surgical ward safety.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Patrick J Tighe; Amanda C Filiberto; Jeremy Balch; Gilbert R Upchurch; Parisa Rashidi; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  The impact of continuous wireless monitoring on adverse device effects in medical and surgical wards: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  Eske K Aasvang; Christian S Meyhoff; Nikolaj Aagaard; Arendse Tange Larsen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 1.977

6.  False alarm reduction in critical care.

Authors:  Gari D Clifford; Ikaro Silva; Benjamin Moody; Qiao Li; Danesh Kella; Abdullah Chahin; Tristan Kooistra; Diane Perry; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs Using Wearable Devices on the General Ward: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Harry van Goor; Bas Frietman; Lucien Jlpg Engelen; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven; Jan Smit; Sebastian Jh Bredie; Tom H van de Belt
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs in the General Ward Using Wearable Devices: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Sebastian J Bredie; Mats Koeneman; Gijs Hesselink; Harry van Goor; Tom H van de Belt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Machine learning in critical care: state-of-the-art and a sepsis case study.

Authors:  Alfredo Vellido; Vicent Ribas; Carles Morales; Adolfo Ruiz Sanmartín; Juan Carlos Ruiz Rodríguez
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Reduction of false alarms in the intensive care unit using an optimized machine learning based approach.

Authors:  Wan-Tai M Au-Yeung; Ashish K Sahani; Eric M Isselbacher; Antonis A Armoundas
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.