Literature DB >> 27454050

Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment in hypertension: 9. Discontinuations for adverse events attributed to different classes of antihypertensive drugs: meta-analyses of randomized trials.

Costas Thomopoulos1, Gianfranco Parati, Alberto Zanchetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Choice of antihypertensive drugs is also based on the expected burden of adverse events associated with each class of agents, and we have recently identified treatment discontinuation for adverse events as a measure of treatment tolerability frequently reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether all classes of blood pressure (BP) lowering drugs increase discontinuations for adverse events when compared with placebo and whether risk of discontinuation is similar for all classes when compared in head-to-head RCTs.
METHODS: RCTs of BP-lowering treatment were subdivided in groups according to class of drug compared with placebo or with other classes. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of major cardiovascular events and of treatment discontinuations for adverse events were calculated (random-effects model).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight placebo-controlled RCTs (147 788 patients) and 37 head-to-head RCTs (242 481 patients) provided comparative information on discontinuations for adverse events. All classes of drugs significantly increased discontinuations for adverse events over those occurring on placebo: risk ratio diuretics 2.23 (1.32-3.76), beta-blockers 2.88 (1.58-5.28), calcium antagonists 2.03 (1.17-3.56), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 2.78 (1.37-5.47), central agents 1.74 (1.24-2.45), with the single exception of angiotensin receptor blockers, which did not significantly increase adverse events over placebo [risk ratio 1.13 (0.78-1.62)]. Similarly, in head-to-head comparison RCTs with other classes, angiotensin receptor blockers were the only class associated with a significantly lower risk of adverse events [risk ratio 0.71 (0.58-0.87)] when head-to-head compared with other classes. Regression analysis also shows that incidence of discontinuations for adverse events is proportional to the number of antihypertensive and other cardiovascular drugs, which accounts for the high incidence of this outcome often found in groups randomized to placebo.
CONCLUSION: Reduction of cardiovascular events by all classes of BP-lowering drugs is accompanied by increased treatment discontinuations for adverse events, except when angiotensin receptor blockers are used. Treatment discontinuations are also related to treatment often accompanying antihypertensive agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27454050     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  19 in total

Review 1.  Position statement on use of pharmacological combinations in a single pill for treatment of hypertension by Argentine Federation of Cardiology (FAC) and Argentine Society of Hypertension (SAHA).

Authors:  Nicolás Renna; Daniel Piskorz; Diego Stisman; Diego Martinez; Ludmila Lescano; Sergio Vissani; Walter Espeche; Diego Marquez; Roberto Parodi; Diego Naninni; Marcos Baroni; Daniel Llanos; Rocio Martinez; Jessica Barochinner; Gustavo Staffieri; Fernando Lanas; Mónica Velásquez; Marcos Marin; Bryan Williams; Irene Ennis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Hypertension: Controversies in blood-pressure goals among the elderly.

Authors:  Josep Redon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  A review of the prescribing trend of thiazide-type and thiazide-like diuretics in hypertension: A UK perspective.

Authors:  Ryan J McNally; Franca Morselli; Bushra Farukh; Philip J Chowienczyk; Luca Faconti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in the Management of Hypertension: A Real-World Perspective and Current Recommendations.

Authors:  Giovanna Gallo; Massimo Volpe; Speranza Rubattu
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Candesartan and carvedilol for primary prevention of subclinical cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients without a cardiovascular risk treated with doxorubicin.

Authors:  Myunhee Lee; Woo-Baek Chung; Ji-Eun Lee; Chan-Seok Park; Woo-Chan Park; Byung-Joo Song; Ho-Joong Youn
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Hypertension referrals from community pharmacy to general practice: multivariate logistic regression analysis of 131 419 patients.

Authors:  Ali Albasri; Suman Prinjha; Richard J McManus; James P Sheppard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Interactions between erectile dysfunction, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular drugs.

Authors:  Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Nikolaos Ioakeimidis; Konstantinos Rokkas; Charalambos Vlachopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Observed and expected serious adverse event rates in randomised clinical trials for hypertension: an observational study comparing trials that do and do not focus on older people.

Authors:  Peter Hanlon; Neave Corcoran; Guy Rughani; Anoop S V Shah; Frances S Mair; Bruce Guthrie; Joanne P Renton; David A McAllister
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2021-07

Review 9.  Management of arterial hypertension with angiotensin receptor blockers: Current evidence and the role of olmesartan.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 10.  Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension and the Role of Olmesartan.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.