| Literature DB >> 27453530 |
Nhu Thuy Ho1, Huynh Ngoc Tien2, Se-Joeng Jang1, Velusamy Senthilkumar1, Yun Chang Park3, Shinuk Cho1, Yong Soo Kim1.
Abstract
High performance of organic tandem solar cell is largely dependent on transparent and conductive intermediate layer (IML). The current work reports the design and fabrication of an IML using a simple solution process. The efficiency of a homo-tandem device with poly(3-hexylthiophene):phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester as an active layer and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate)/poly(ethylenimine) as an IML was initially found to be 3.40%. Further enhancement of the cell efficiency was achieved using silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) of different sizes and graphene quantum dot embedded IML. A maximum efficiency of 4.03% was achieved using 7 nm Ag-NPs that contribute to a better recombination process. Also, the performance of the tandem cell was solely based on the electrical improvements indicated by the current - voltage measurements, external quantum efficiency and impedance analysis. The use of Ag-NPs in the IML has been shown to lengthen the life time of electron-hole pairs in the device. This study thus paves way to develop such efficient IMLs for more efficient tandem solar cells.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27453530 PMCID: PMC4958952 DOI: 10.1038/srep30327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) UV-Vis absorption spectra of Ag-NPs, (b) UV-Vis absorption (red curve) and PL spectrum (blue curve) of G-QDs.
Figure 2(a) TEM image of Ag-NPs of 10 nm, (b) 20 nm, (c) 30 nm and (d) G-QDs. Inserted in (d) high resolution images and its diffraction pattern.
Figure 3(a) Schematic of a tandem organic solar cell based on P3HT:PCBM active layer, (b) cross-sectional TEM image of the device (FIB method), and (c) band alignment of the device.
Figure 4(a) Current density-voltage characteristic and (b) External quantum efficiency of single and tandem OSC devices.
Device parameters of tandem OSC with and without Ag-NPs.
| Sample | FF (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single cell w/o Ag-NPs | 8.93 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 3.10 | 9.69 | 4.13 |
| Single cell w Ag-NPs | 9.00 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 3.23 | 10.3 | 5.32 |
| Tandem cell w/o Ag-NPs | 6.31 | 1.15 | 0.47 | 3.40 | 41.8 | 4.28 |
| Tandem cell w Ag-NPs | 6.91 | 1.15 | 0.51 | 4.03 | 34.7 | 4.99 |
Device parameters of tandem OSC with and without G-QDs.
| Sample | FF (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single cell w/o G-QDs | 8.46 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 2.94 | 10.9 | 4.51 |
| Single cell w G-QDs | 8.95 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 3.15 | 10.6 | 5.07 |
| Tandem cell w/o G-QDs | 6.28 | 1.15 | 0.47 | 3.38 | 50 | 4.17 |
| Tandem cell w G-QDs | 6.61 | 1.15 | 0.49 | 3.72 | 45 | 4.80 |
Figure 5(a) IMVS at open-circuit condition, (b) IMPS at Voc, (c) semi-log plot of dark current density-voltage, and (d) Nyquist plot of the impedance of tandem OSC according to with and without Ag-NPs.