Laura Fanucchi1, Donglin Yan, Rosemarie L Conigliaro. 1. Laura Fanucchi, MD, MPH, Center for Health Services Research, Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 900 South Limestone, 306B Charles T. Wethington Bldg, Lexington, KY 40536, Ph: 859-323-1982, Fax: 859-257-2605, Email: laura.fanucchi@uky.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Communication errors are identified as a root cause contributing to a majority of sentinel events. The clinical note is a cornerstone of physician communication, yet there are few published interventions on teaching note writing in the electronic health record (EHR). This is a prospective, two-site, quality improvement project to assess and improve the quality of clinical documentation in the EHR using a validated assessment tool. METHODS: Internal Medicine (IM) residents at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine (UK) and Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine (MMC) received one of two interventions during an inpatient ward month: either a lecture, or a lecture and individual feedback on progress notes. A third group of residents in each program served as control. Notes were evaluated with the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument 9 (PDQI-9). RESULTS: Due to a significant difference in baseline PDQI-9 scores at MMC, the sites were not combined. Of 75 residents at the UK site, 22 were eligible, 20 (91%) enrolled, 76 notes in total were scored. Of 156 residents at MMC, 22 were eligible, 18 (82%) enrolled, 40 notes in total were scored. Note quality did not improve as measured by the PDQI-9. CONCLUSION: This educational quality improvement project did not improve the quality of clinical documentation as measured by the PDQI-9. This project underscores the difficulty in improving note quality. Further efforts should explore more effective educational tools to improve the quality of clinical documentation in the EHR.
BACKGROUND:Communication errors are identified as a root cause contributing to a majority of sentinel events. The clinical note is a cornerstone of physician communication, yet there are few published interventions on teaching note writing in the electronic health record (EHR). This is a prospective, two-site, quality improvement project to assess and improve the quality of clinical documentation in the EHR using a validated assessment tool. METHODS: Internal Medicine (IM) residents at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine (UK) and Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine (MMC) received one of two interventions during an inpatient ward month: either a lecture, or a lecture and individual feedback on progress notes. A third group of residents in each program served as control. Notes were evaluated with the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument 9 (PDQI-9). RESULTS: Due to a significant difference in baseline PDQI-9 scores at MMC, the sites were not combined. Of 75 residents at the UK site, 22 were eligible, 20 (91%) enrolled, 76 notes in total were scored. Of 156 residents at MMC, 22 were eligible, 18 (82%) enrolled, 40 notes in total were scored. Note quality did not improve as measured by the PDQI-9. CONCLUSION: This educational quality improvement project did not improve the quality of clinical documentation as measured by the PDQI-9. This project underscores the difficulty in improving note quality. Further efforts should explore more effective educational tools to improve the quality of clinical documentation in the EHR.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electronic health record; clinical documentation; medical education
Authors: Heather L Heiman; Sonya Rasminsky; Jennifer A Bierman; Daniel B Evans; Kathryn G Kinner; Julie Stamos; Zoran Martinovich; William C McGaghie Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Christopher A March; Gretchen Scholl; Renee K Dversdal; Matthew Richards; Leah M Wilson; Vishnu Mohan; Jeffrey A Gold Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2016-05
Authors: Eric L Grogan; Theodore Speroff; Stephen A Deppen; Christianne L Roumie; Tom A Elasy; Robert S Dittus; S Trent Rosenbloom; Michael D Holzman Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Harry B Burke; Albert Hoang; Dorothy Becher; Paul Fontelo; Fang Liu; Mark Stephens; Louis N Pangaro; Laura L Sessums; Patrick O'Malley; Nancy S Baxi; Christopher W Bunt; Vincent F Capaldi; Julie M Chen; Barbara A Cooper; David A Djuric; Joshua A Hodge; Shawn Kane; Charles Magee; Zizette R Makary; Renee M Mallory; Thomas Miller; Adam Saperstein; Jessica Servey; Ronald W Gimbel Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Tom Ebbers; Rudolf B Kool; Ludi E Smeele; Richard Dirven; Chrisje A den Besten; Luc H E Karssemakers; Tim Verhoeven; Jasmijn M Herruer; Guido B van den Broek; Robert P Takes Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 4.920
Authors: Bradley H Crotty; Melissa Anselmo; Deserae Clarke; Joann G Elmore; Linda M Famiglio; Alan Fossa; Lydia Flier; Jamie Green; Jared W Klein; Suzanne Leveille; Chen-Tan Lin; Corey Lyon; Roanne Mejilla; Matthew Moles; Rebecca A Stametz; Michelle Thompson; Jan Walker; Sigall K Bell Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2018-06
Authors: Jeremy A Epstein; Joseph Cofrancesco; Mary Catherine Beach; Amanda Bertram; Helene F Hedian; Sara Mixter; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Gail Berkenblit Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 5.128