Literature DB >> 27451887

A dual-stage approach to contaminated, high-risk ventral hernia repairs.

Nathan W Kugler1, Melanie Bobbs2, Travis Webb2, Thomas W Carver2, David Milia2, Jasmeet S Paul2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Modified Hernia Grading System (MHGS) was developed to risk stratify complex ventral hernia repairs (VHRs). MHGS grade 3 patients have mesh infections, dirty or contaminated fields, and/or violation of the alimentary tract. Reported surgical site infection (SSI) rates are over 40% after single-stage VHR in contaminated fields. In an attempt to decrease the SSI rate in MHGS grade 3 patients, we developed a dual-stage VHR (DSVHR) approach.
METHODS: We reviewed adult general surgery patients undergoing DSVHR between January 2010 and June 2014. All patients were MHGS grade 3. Primary end point was 30-d superficial and deep SSI. Secondary end points included other surgical site occurrences, 6-mo recurrence, and mesh excision rates.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent DSVHR. Mean age was 56 y, and median body mass index was 38.3 kg/m(2). Operative indication included enterocutaneous fistulas (ECF; n = 6), ECF with infected mesh (n = 2), infected mesh (n = 2), and VHR requiring bowel resection (n = 5). Thirty-one operative procedures were performed with median of 2.5 d between procedures. Fascial closure was re-established in 12 patients; five patients had underlay biologic mesh placement; seven underwent component separation with retrorectus mesh placement (synthetic [n = 2], biologic [n = 5]). The remaining patients underwent bridging repair with biologic mesh. One patient developed a recurrence after 6 mo, whereas a single patient had a recurrence of their ECF. Four (27%) patients developed a SSI, with an additional four (27%) experiencing a surgical site occurrence. There were no postoperative mesh infections.
CONCLUSIONS: DSVHR in MHGS grade 3 patients is associated with a lower SSI rate than previously reported for those undergoing single-stage repairs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contaminated; Dirty; Hernia; High-risk; Infected; Surgical site infection; Ventral hernia; Ventral hernia repair

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27451887     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

1.  Management of ventral hernia defect during enterocutaneous fistula takedown: practice patterns and short-term outcomes from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative.

Authors:  A Fafaj; L Tastaldi; H Alkhatib; S J Zolin; S Rosenblatt; L-C Huang; S Phillips; D M Krpata; A S Prabhu; C C Petro; M J Rosen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Katzen; Sullivan A Ayuso; Jana Sacco; Dau Ku; Gregory T Scarola; Kent W Kercher; Paul D Colavita; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Anastomotic Leakage After Stoma Reversal Combined with Incisional Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Niklas N Baastrup; Morten F S Hartwig; Peter-Martin Krarup; Lars N Jorgensen; Kristian K Jensen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A post-market, prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical investigation of Phasix™ mesh for VHWG grade 3 midline incisional hernia repair: a research protocol.

Authors:  M M J van Rooijen; A P Jairam; T Tollens; L N Jørgensen; T S de Vries Reilingh; G Piessen; F Köckerling; M Miserez; A C J Windsor; F Berrevoet; R H Fortelny; B Dousset; G Woeste; H L van Westreenen; F Gossetti; J F Lange; G W M Tetteroo; A Koch; L F Kroese; J Jeekel
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.