Christine M Everett1, Perri Morgan2, George L Jackson3. 1. Physician Assistant Program, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 800 South Duke Street, Durham, NC 27701, United States. Electronic address: christine.everett@duke.edu. 2. Physician Assistant Program, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 800 South Duke Street, Durham, NC 27701, United States. Electronic address: perri.morgan@duke.edu. 3. Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: george.l.jackson@duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Team-based care involving physician assistants (PAs) and advance practice nurses (APNs) is one strategy for improving access and quality of care. PA/APNs perform a variety of roles on primary care teams. However, limited research describes the relationship between PA/APN role and patient outcomes. We examined multiple outcomes associated with primary care PA/APN roles. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey analysis, we studied adult respondents to the 2010 Health Tracking Household Survey. Outcomes included primary care and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, unmet need, and satisfaction. PA/APN role was categorized as physician only (no PA/APN visits; reference), usual provider (PA/APN provide majority of primary care visits) or supplemental provider (physician as usual provider, PA/APN provide a subset of visits). Multivariable logistic and multinomial logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS: Compared to people with physician only care, patients with PA/APNs as usual providers [5-9 visits RRR=2.4 (CI 1.8-3.4), 10+ visits RRR=3.0 (CI 2.0-4.5): reference 2-4 visits] and supplemental providers had increased risk of having 5 or more primary care visits [5-9 visits RRR=1.3 (CI 1.0-1.6)]. Patients reporting PA/APN as supplemental providers had increased risk of emergency department utilization [2+ visits: RRR 1.8 (CI 1.3, 2.5)], and lower satisfaction [very dissatisfied: RRR 1.8 (CI 1.03-3.0)]. No differences were seen for hospitalizations or unmet need. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare utilization patterns and satisfaction varied between adults with PA/APN in different roles, but reported unmet need did not. These findings suggest a wide range of outcomes should be considered when identifying the best PA/APN role on primary care teams.
PURPOSE: Team-based care involving physician assistants (PAs) and advance practice nurses (APNs) is one strategy for improving access and quality of care. PA/APNs perform a variety of roles on primary care teams. However, limited research describes the relationship between PA/APN role and patient outcomes. We examined multiple outcomes associated with primary care PA/APN roles. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey analysis, we studied adult respondents to the 2010 Health Tracking Household Survey. Outcomes included primary care and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, unmet need, and satisfaction. PA/APN role was categorized as physician only (no PA/APN visits; reference), usual provider (PA/APN provide majority of primary care visits) or supplemental provider (physician as usual provider, PA/APN provide a subset of visits). Multivariable logistic and multinomial logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS: Compared to people with physician only care, patients with PA/APNs as usual providers [5-9 visits RRR=2.4 (CI 1.8-3.4), 10+ visits RRR=3.0 (CI 2.0-4.5): reference 2-4 visits] and supplemental providers had increased risk of having 5 or more primary care visits [5-9 visits RRR=1.3 (CI 1.0-1.6)]. Patients reporting PA/APN as supplemental providers had increased risk of emergency department utilization [2+ visits: RRR 1.8 (CI 1.3, 2.5)], and lower satisfaction [very dissatisfied: RRR 1.8 (CI 1.03-3.0)]. No differences were seen for hospitalizations or unmet need. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare utilization patterns and satisfaction varied between adults with PA/APN in different roles, but reported unmet need did not. These findings suggest a wide range of outcomes should be considered when identifying the best PA/APN role on primary care teams.
Authors: Christine M Everett; Perri Morgan; Valerie A Smith; Sandra Woolson; David Edelman; Cristina C Hendrix; Theodore Berkowitz; Brandolyn White; George L Jackson Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Matthew E Bernard; Susan B Laabs; Darshan Nagaraju; Summer V Allen; Michael P Halasy; David R Rushlow; Gregory M Garrison; Julie A Maxson; Marc R Matthews; Gerald J Sobolik; Michelle A Lampman; Randy M Foss; Steven L Rosas; Tom D Thacher Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-04-08
Authors: Valerie A Smith; Perri A Morgan; David Edelman; Sandra L Woolson; Theodore S Z Berkowitz; Courtney H Van Houtven; Cristina C Hendrix; Christine M Everett; Brandolyn S White; George L Jackson Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Uwe Klaus Zettl; Ulrike Bauer-Steinhusen; Thomas Glaser; Klaus Hechenbichler; Michael Hecker Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Elliot J Bruhl; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Summer V Allen; Jennifer L Horn; Kurt B Angstman; Gregory M Garrison; Julie A Maxson; Debra K McCauley; Michelle A Lampman; Tom D Thacher Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-04-06