Literature DB >> 27450944

Predictors of Nodal Upstaging in Clinical Node Negative Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Brian R Winters1, Matthew Mossanen2, Sarah K Holt2, Daniel W Lin3, Jonathan L Wright3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk factors associated with upstaging at inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in men with penile cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0) using a large US cancer database.
METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried from 1998 to 2012 to identify men with penile cancer who underwent ILND and had complete clinical or pathologic node status available. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was available after 2010. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated factors (cT stage, grade, LVI) associated with pathologic nodal upstaging in those with cN0 disease. Correlations between clinical and pathologic node status were also calculated with weighted kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Complete clinical and pathologic LN status was available for 875 patients. Of these, 461 (53%) were cN0. Upstaging occurred in 111 (24%). When stratified by low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, the proportion with pathologically positive LNs was 16%, 20%, and 27%, respectively (P = .12). On multivariate analysis, limited to men with LVI data available (N = 206), LVI (odds ratio 3.10, 95% confidence interval 1.39-6.92), but not increasing stage (univariate only) or grade (univariate only), was significantly associated with upstaging at ILND.
CONCLUSION: In this analysis, of 461 patients with node-negative penile cancer undergoing ILND, upstaging was observed in 24%. LVI was the strongest independent predictor of occult lymph node disease. These findings corroborate the presence of LVI as the significant risk factor for occult micrometastases and suggest a possible improvement in existing risk stratification groupings, with the presence of LVI, regardless of stage or grade, to be considered high-risk disease.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27450944     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current Management Strategy for Penile Cancer and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tanya B Dorff; Leslie K Ballas; Anne K Schuckman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Therapeutic and Surgical Indications for Patients with Penile Cancer in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Nelson Canales Casco; María Jiménez Carmona; Álvaro Juárez Soto
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Molecular stratification by BCL2A1 and AIM2 provides additional prognostic value in penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xingliang Tan; Dong Chen; Shengjie Guo; Yanjun Wang; Yuantao Zou; Zhiming Wu; Fangjian Zhou; Zike Qin; Zhuowei Liu; Yun Cao; Chunhua Lin; Gangjun Yuan; Kai Yao
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Lymph Node Dissections for T3T4 Stage Penile Cancer Patients Without Preoperatively Detectable Lymph Node Metastasis Bring More Survival Benefits: A Propensity Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Han Li; Yucheng Ma; Zhongyu Jian; Xi Jin; Liyuan Xiang; Hong Li; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  piRNAs and PIWI Proteins as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers of Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  Karolina Hanusek; Sławomir Poletajew; Piotr Kryst; Agnieszka Piekiełko-Witkowska; Joanna Bogusławska
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-01-22

6.  Value of c-MET and Associated Signaling Elements for Predicting Outcomes and Targeted Therapy in Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Anita Thomas; Kimberly Sue Slade; Roman A Blaheta; Sascha D Markowitsch; Philipp Stenzel; Katrin E Tagscherer; Wilfried Roth; Mario Schindeldecker; Martin Michaelis; Florian Rothweiler; Jaroslav Cinatl; Robert Dotzauer; Olesya Vakhrusheva; Maarten Albersen; Axel Haferkamp; Eva Juengel; Jindrich Cinatl; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Tumor Microenvironment in Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Walter
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory factors NLR, LMR, PLR and LDH in penile cancer.

Authors:  Chen Hu; Yu Bai; Jun Li; Guoyin Zhang; Libo Yang; Chengwei Bi; Bin Zhao; Yong Yang; Ruiqian Li; Hongyi Wu; Qilin Wang; Yang Qin
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Predictors of inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile cancer patients: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Jiao Hu; Yu Cui; Peihua Liu; Xu Zhou; Wenbiao Ren; Jinbo Chen; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Assessment of PI3K/mTOR/AKT Pathway Elements to Serve as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Anita Thomas; Sascha Reetz; Philipp Stenzel; Katrin Tagscherer; Wilfried Roth; Mario Schindeldecker; Martin Michaelis; Florian Rothweiler; Jindrich Cinatl; Jaroslav Cinatl; Robert Dotzauer; Olesya Vakhrusheva; Maarten Albersen; Stephan Macher-Goeppinger; Axel Haferkamp; Eva Juengel; Andreas Neisius; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.