Literature DB >> 27450188

Financial "risk-sharing" or refund programs in assisted reproduction: an Ethics Committee opinion.

.   

Abstract

Financial "risk-sharing" fee structures in assisted reproduction programs charge patients a higher initial fee but provide reduced fees for subsequent cycles and often a partial or complete refund if treatment fails. This opinion of the ASRM Ethics Committee analyzes the ethical issues raised by these fee structures, including patient selection criteria, conflicts of interest, success rate transparency, and patient informed consent. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2013 (Fertil Steril 2013;100:334-6).
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; Ethics; cost; in vitro fertilization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27450188     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  1 in total

1.  How much is a child worth? Providers' and patients' views and responses concerning ethical and policy challenges in paying for ART.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.