| Literature DB >> 27449800 |
Avish L Jain1, Christian M Harding1,2, Kaivon Assani1, Chandra L Shrestha1, Mercedees Haga1, Amy Leber3, Robert S Munson1, Benjamin T Kopp4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter species are associated with increasing mortality due to emerging drug-resistance. Pediatric Acinetobacter infections are largely undefined in developed countries and clinical laboratory identification methods do not reliably differentiate between members of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex, leading to improper identification. Therefore we aimed to determine risk factors for invasive Acinetobacter infections within an academic, pediatric setting as well as defining microbiologic characteristics of predominant strains.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter; Antibiotic resistance; Bacteremia; Pediatric
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27449800 PMCID: PMC4957376 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1678-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Phylogenetic Tree of Acinetobacter Clinical Isolates. Acinetobacter rpoB sequences from our collection as well as reference sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega based on the BioNJ algorithm. The tree was built using MegAlign Pro from the DNASTAR suite of programs. Horizontal branch length is a measure of genetic distance
Patient demographics and identified risk factors for Acinetobacter infection
| Percentage / Median | Range (if median reported) | |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Demographics | ||
| Male | 62.5 % | |
| Caucasian | 79.2 % | |
| Medicaid | 70.8 % | |
| Age (years) | 3.5 | 1.0–13.8 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 18.0 | 15.8–21.2 |
| Source | ||
| Blood | 79.2 % | |
| Peritoneal Fluid | 4.2 % | |
| Bone/soft tissue | 8.3 % | |
| Respiratory tract | 8.3 % | |
| Risk Factors | ||
| Previously healthy | 0 % | |
| Central venous catheter | 70.8 % | |
| Past bone marrow transplant | 20.8 % | |
| Secondhand smoke exposure | 29.2 % | |
| Taken antibiotics in past 30 days | 41.7 % | |
| Chronic antibiotics >30 days | 41.7 % | |
| Chronic immunosuppressants | 37.5 % | |
| Gastroesophageal reflux | 41.7 % | |
Patient laboratory parameters and hospital characteristics
| All isolates Percent/Median (Range) |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory Data | |||
| White blood cell (k/mm3) | 7.7 (1.6–14.3) | 7.7 (1.2–11.0) | 6.8 (1.5–20.9) |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 9.2 (7.8–9.9) | 9.0 (7.6–9.3) | 8.8 (7.8–11.1) |
| Neutrophils | 60.0 % (44.0–76.0) | 62.0 % (26.8–76.3) | 57.0 % (49.5–69.5) |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.45 (0.32–0.65) | 0.44 (0.37–0.65) | 0.35 (0.24–0.65) |
| ALT (IU/L) | 37.5 (18.0–143.3) | 13.0 (8.0–18.0) | 135.0 (37.5–157.5) |
| AST (IU/L) | 45.5 (38.5–93.5) | 39.0 (37.0–41.0) | 71.0 (45.0–177.0) |
| Hospital Visit | |||
| Length of stay (days) | 10.5 (3.3–67.5) | 3.5 (1.5–16.3) | 13.5 (5.0–82.5) |
| Intensive care unit (ICU) | 33.3 % | 25.0 % | 45.5 % |
| Hematology / Oncology unit | 33.3 % | 37.5 % | 36.4 % |
| Emergency / Outpatient | 33.3 % | 37.5 % | 18.1 % |
| Oxygen use | 33.3 % | 0 % | 54.5 % |
| Ventilator use | 37.5 % | 18.2 % | 45.5 % |
| Mortality | 8.3 % | 0 % | 18.2 % |
| Antibiotic duration (days) | 14.0 (9.3–14.0) | 14.0 (10.0–19.0) | 14.0 (6.0–14.0) |
| Follow up culture negativea | 79.9 % | 87.5 % | 81.8 % |
aResults of the next bacterial culture within 48 h of antibiotic initiation
Antibiotic susceptibility patterns as percentage of susceptible Acinetobacter isolates
| All isolates (%, n) |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime | 79.2, 19 | 90.1, 10 | 62.5, 5 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 87.5, 21 | 100, 11 | 62.5, 5 |
| Gentamicin | 83.3, 20 | 90.1, 10 | 62.5, 5 |
| Meropenem | 87.5, 21 | 100, 11 | 62.5, 5 |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | 87.5, 21 | 100, 11 | 62.5, 5 |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 83.3, 20 | 90.1, 10 | 75.0, 6 |
| Tobramycin | 91.7, 22 | 100, 11 | 75.0, 6 |
Phenotypic characteristics of Acinetobacter isolates association with clinical factors
| Biofilm-forming ( | Non-biofilm-forming ( |
| Swarming motility ( | Non-swarming motility ( |
| Twitching motility ( | Non-twitching motility ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 4.0 (0.4–11.5) | 3.0 (2.0–19.0) | 0.84 | 4.5 (1.0–16.8) | 3.5 (0.9–4.0) | 0.37 | 3.5 (0.6–17.5) | 3.5 (1.5–6.3) | 0.57 |
| Central line infection | 64.7 % | 85.7 % | 0.38 | 68.8 % | 66.7 % | 0.99 | 71.4 % | 70.0 % | 0.99 |
| Bacteremia at 48 h | 17.6 % | 0.0 % | 0.53 | 12.5 % | 12.5 % | 0.99 | 14.3 % | 10.0 % | 0.99 |
| MDR | 5.9 % | 42.9 % | 0.027 | 18.8 % | 12.5 % | 0.80 | 21.4 % | 10.0 % | 0.48 |
| ICU | 35.3 % | 28.6 % | 0.76 | 37.5 % | 25.0 % | 0.56 | 42.9 % | 20.0 % | 0.26 |
| Abx in past 30 days | 47.1 % | 28.6 % | 0.43 | 37.5 % | 50.0 % | 0.67 | 42.9 % | 40.0 % | 0.99 |
| Immuno-suppressant | 29.4 % | 71.4 % | 0.06 | 43.8 % | 37.5 % | 0.78 | 42.9 % | 40.0 % | 0.99 |
| Length of stay (days) | 17.0 (4.5–80.0) | 5.0 (3.0–20.0) | 0.21 0.99 | 18.5 (4.3–63.3) | 5.0 (3.3–35) | 0.32 | 11.0 (3.0–97.5) | 10.5 (4.5–27.3) | 0.92 |
| SHS exposure | 23.5 % | 28.6 % | 0.99 | 34.1 % | 53.5 % | 0.13 | 28.6 % | 20.0 % | 0.99 |
| GER | 35.3 % | 28.6 % | 43.8 % | 12.5 % | 0.14 | 35.7 % | 30.0 % | 0.99 |
Data are expressed as a percentage of cases with medians and ranges
Abx antibiotic use in 30 days prior to infection; GER gastroesophageal reflux; ICU Intensive care unit care required; MDR multi-drug resistance with isolates non-susceptible to ≥ 1 antimicrobial agent in ≥ 3 antimicrobial categories; SHS secondhand smoke
Fig. 2Bacterial isolate characteristics. a Individual isolate results of biofilm and twitching and surface-associated motility assays with grouping by species. The level of biofilm formation was determined by measuring the absorbance at 595 nm post crystal violet staining. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean of three independent experiments. Twitching and surface-associated motility are characterized as positive or negative based on experimental methods. All experiments performed in triplicate. Strains are designated as: “b” = baumannii, “p” = pittii, “n” = nosocomialis, “c” = calcoaceticus, two strains are undesignated. b Box and whiskers plot demonstrating sum of median biofilm production with minimum and maximum error bars for A. pittii and A. baumannii strains from Fig. 2a, P value =0.018