Literature DB >> 27449761

Comparison of the effect of region-of-interest methods using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging on staging hepatic fibrosis.

Ying Ding1, Shengxiang Rao2, Li Yang1, Caizhong Chen1, Mengsu Zeng1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and DWI for staging liver fibrosis and assess the influence of ROI positioning on interobserver variability, T1 relaxation time and ADC value.
METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and included 150 patients (mean age 58 years old; 91 men and 59 women). Liver fibrosis stages (S) were histopathologically determined. T1 relaxation time and ADC value of liver were measured by three distinct ROI protocols (the whole left lobe liver, the whole right lobe liver and the individual ROIs). T1 relaxation time measurements were compared with ADC values according to S scores. Interobserver variability for the T1 relaxation times and ADC values by the three distinct ROI protocols was analyzed by calculating the ICC.
RESULTS: T1 relaxation time measurements by the three distinct ROI protocols on severe fibrosis stage were significantly higher than the relative values on mild fibrosis stage. The mean ADC values on severe fibrosis stage showed no significantly different when measured by means of the whole right lobe liver (p = 0.057) and the individual ROIs (p = 0.10), compared with the relative values on mild fibrosis stage. AUCs of T1 relaxation time and ADC value by the means of the three distinct ROI protocols were 0.614, 0.676, 0.677 and 0.656, 0.585, 0.575 for identification of severe fibrosis stage. The interobserver reproducibility was excellent for measuring the right lobe liver T1 relaxation time and the individual ROIs T1 relaxation time (ICC 0.814, 0.883, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: T1 relaxation time measurements by means of the three distinct ROI protocols on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging were a potential biomarker in staging of hepatic fibrosis, which were more accuracy than DWI-ADC measurements. The more reproducible results were obtained when measuring T1 relaxation time of the whole right lobe liver and the individual ROIs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Gadoxetic acid; Liver fibrosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Observer variation; T1 relaxation time

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27449761     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0669-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  25 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive monitoring of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Robert Scott; Indra Neil Guha
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation provides safe and effective analgesia for percutaneous liver biopsy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  L Castéra; I Nègre; K Samii; C Buffet
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Laurent Castéra; Julien Vergniol; Juliette Foucher; Brigitte Le Bail; Elise Chanteloup; Maud Haaser; Monique Darriet; Patrice Couzigou; Victor De Lédinghen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Liver fibrosis staging using T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI compared with DW imaging.

Authors:  Y Ding; S-X Rao; T Zhu; C-Z Chen; R-C Li; M-S Zeng
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Staging hepatic fibrosis: comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging--preliminary observations.

Authors:  Haruo Watanabe; Masayuki Kanematsu; Satoshi Goshima; Hiroshi Kondo; Minoru Onozuka; Noriyuki Moriyama; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Real-time Tissue Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Adults Without Known Liver Disease.

Authors:  Yu Hu; Hai-Yan Gong; Hong-Jun Lin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 7.  Assessment of hepatic function with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatic MRI.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Bae; So Yeon Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Kyoung Won Kim; Hyung Jin Won; Yong Moon Shin; Pyo Nyun Kim; Moon-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.404

8.  Factors of accuracy of transient elastography (fibroscan) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Damien Lucidarme; Juliette Foucher; Brigitte Le Bail; Julien Vergniol; Laurent Castera; Clotilde Duburque; Gérard Forzy; Bernard Filoche; Patrice Couzigou; Victor de Lédinghen
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Relationship between diffusion parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion MRI and perfusion measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  Simona Marzi; Linda Stefanetti; Francesca Sperati; Vincenzo Anelli
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Measuring hepatic functional reserve using low temporal resolution Gd-EOB-DTPA dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a preliminary study comparing galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy with indocyanine green retention.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Saito; Joseph Ledsam; Steven Sourbron; Tsuyoshi Hashimoto; Yoichi Araki; Soichi Akata; Koichi Tokuuye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis: a review from the society of abdominal radiology disease focus panel.

Authors:  Jeanne M Horowitz; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Kartik Jhaveri; Patrick Kamath; Michael A Ohliger; Anthony E Samir; Alvin C Silva; Bachir Taouli; Michael S Torbenson; Michael L Wells; Benjamin Yeh; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

2.  Impact of Liver Fibrosis and Fatty Liver on T1rho Measurements: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Xie; Qing Li; Yue Cheng; Yu Zhang; Zhizheng Zhuo; Guiming Zhao; Wen Shen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Magnetic resonance T1-mapping evaluates the degree of thyroid destruction in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Min Liu; Zhe Chen; Yumei Jia; Guang Wang
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.335

4.  Value of T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Chenyi Rao; Xinquan Wang; Minda Li; Guofeng Zhou; Hongmei Gu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 5.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of liver: Principles, clinical applications and recent updates.

Authors:  Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle; Vinit Baliyan; Hamed Kordbacheh; Alexander R Guimaraes; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.