| Literature DB >> 27449697 |
Holly Kramer1, Jerry Yee2, Daniel E Weiner3, Vinod Bansal4, Michael J Choi5, Laura Brereton6, Jeffrey S Berns7, Milagros Samaniego-Picota8, Paul Scheel5, Michael Rocco9.
Abstract
High hemodialysis ultrafiltration rate (UFR) is increasingly recognized as an important and modifiable risk factor for mortality among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Recently, the Kidney Care Quality Alliance (KCQA) developed a UFR measure to assess dialysis unit care quality. The UFR measure was defined as UFR≥13mL/kg/h for patients with dialysis session length less than 240 minutes and was endorsed by the National Quality Forum as a quality measure in December 2015. Despite this, implementation of a UFR threshold remains controversial. In this NKF-KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) Controversies Report, we discuss the concept of the UFR, which is governed by patients' interdialytic weight gain, body weight, and dialysis treatment time. We also examine the potential benefits and pitfalls of adopting a UFR threshold as a clinical performance measure and outline several aspects of UFR thresholds that require further research.Entities:
Keywords: Hemodialysis (HD); NKF-KDOQI; controversies; dialysis; dialysis dose; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); fluid removal; interdialytic weight gain (IDW); performance measure; quality of care; sodium; treatment time; ultrafiltration rate (UFR); volume management
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27449697 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.06.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Kidney Dis ISSN: 0272-6386 Impact factor: 8.860