Christoph Oing1, Winfried H Alsdorf2, Gunhild von Amsberg2, Karin Oechsle2, Carsten Bokemeyer2. 1. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. c.oing@uke.de. 2. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In general, 50 % up to 80 % of metastasized germ cell tumor patients can be cured by platinum-based chemotherapy. However, 3-5 % of patients will still die of platinum-refractory disease and new systemic treatment options are needed to improve treatment success in this difficult setting. This review aims to give an overview on treatment options and current developments in the field of platinum-refractory male germ cell tumors. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and Embase to identify clinical trials regarding the treatment of platinum-refractory disease. ASCO, EAU and ESMO conference proceedings were searched to identify unpublished results of relevant trials. Comprehensive review papers were hand searched for additional references. Clinicaltrials.gov was checked for ongoing clinical trials in the field of platinum-refractory germ cell tumors. RESULTS: Outcome of platinum-refractory disease remains poor. Single-agents with reasonable activity are gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel, but complete remissions resulting in long-term survival could not be achieved. The triple-combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel followed by resection of residual masses provides the best outcomes with objective responses in 51 % of patients and long-term survival in approximately 10-15 %. To date, no molecularly targeted agent has shown reasonable activity. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment options for platinum-refractory disease are limited, but a small subset of patients may achieve long-term disease-free survival by multimodal treatment. The potential of novel targeted agents, i.e. by immune-checkpoint-inhibition remains to be defined.
PURPOSE: In general, 50 % up to 80 % of metastasized germ cell tumorpatients can be cured by platinum-based chemotherapy. However, 3-5 % of patients will still die of platinum-refractory disease and new systemic treatment options are needed to improve treatment success in this difficult setting. This review aims to give an overview on treatment options and current developments in the field of platinum-refractory male germ cell tumors. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and Embase to identify clinical trials regarding the treatment of platinum-refractory disease. ASCO, EAU and ESMO conference proceedings were searched to identify unpublished results of relevant trials. Comprehensive review papers were hand searched for additional references. Clinicaltrials.gov was checked for ongoing clinical trials in the field of platinum-refractory germ cell tumors. RESULTS: Outcome of platinum-refractory disease remains poor. Single-agents with reasonable activity are gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel, but complete remissions resulting in long-term survival could not be achieved. The triple-combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel followed by resection of residual masses provides the best outcomes with objective responses in 51 % of patients and long-term survival in approximately 10-15 %. To date, no molecularly targeted agent has shown reasonable activity. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment options for platinum-refractory disease are limited, but a small subset of patients may achieve long-term disease-free survival by multimodal treatment. The potential of novel targeted agents, i.e. by immune-checkpoint-inhibition remains to be defined.
Authors: Stephen D W Beck; Richard S Foster; Richard Bihrle; Lawrence H Einhorn; John P Donohue Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: J Beyer; A Kramar; R Mandanas; W Linkesch; A Greinix; J P Droz; J L Pico; A Diehl; C Bokemeyer; H J Schmoll; C R Nichols; L H Einhorn; W Siegert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David J Vaughn; Wei-Ting Hwang; Priti Lal; Mark A Rosen; Maryann Gallagher; Peter J O'Dwyer Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michal Mego; Daniela Svetlovska; Vera Miskovska; Jana Obertova; Patrik Palacka; Jan Rajec; Zuzana Sycova-Mila; Michal Chovanec; Katarina Rejlekova; Peter Zuzák; Dalibor Ondrus; Stanislav Spanik; Maria Reckova; Jozef Mardiak Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: A Lorch; A Neubauer; M Hackenthal; A Dieing; J T Hartmann; O Rick; C Bokemeyer; J Beyer Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-10-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M Juliachs; C Muñoz; C A Moutinho; A Vidal; E Condom; M Esteller; M Graupera; O Casanovas; J R Germà; A Villanueva; F Viñals Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vera Miranda-Gonçalves; João Lobo; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Catarina Guimarães-Teixeira; Daniela Barros-Silva; Rita Guimarães; Mariana Cantante; Isaac Braga; Joaquina Maurício; Christoph Oing; Friedemann Honecker; Daniel Nettersheim; Leendert H J Looijenga Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-08-25
Authors: Stefanie Zschäbitz; Florian A Distler; Benjamin Krieger; Patrick Wuchter; Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart; Maximilian Jenzer; Markus Hohenfellner; Peter Dreger; Georg Martin Haag; Dirk Jäger; Sascha Pahernik; Carsten Grüllich Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-04-27
Authors: Andrea Hinsch; Niclas C Blessin; Ronald Simon; Martina Kluth; Kristine Fischer; Claudia Hube-Magg; Wenchao Li; Georgia Makrypidi-Fraune; Björn Wellge; Tim Mandelkow; Nicolaus F Debatin; Doris Höflmayer; Maximilian Lennartz; Guido Sauter; Jakob R Izbicki; Sarah Minner; Franziska Büscheck; Ria Uhlig; David Dum; Till Krech; Andreas M Luebke; Corinna Wittmer; Frank Jacobsen; Eike Burandt; Stefan Steurer; Waldemar Wilczak Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 2.967