Literature DB >> 27449386

Erosive effect of different dietary substances on deciduous and permanent teeth.

T S Carvalho1, T M Schmid2, T Baumann2, A Lussi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of different dietary substances on deciduous and permanent enamel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enamel specimens were prepared from human teeth (n = 108 deciduous molars and n = 108 permanent premolars). We measured the chemical parameters (pH, titratable acidity, viscosity, calcium, phosphate, fluoride concentration and degree of saturation) of nine dietary substances. The teeth were immersed in the respective substance (2 × 2 min; 30 °C; shaking), and we measured the baseline surface hardness (SH) in Vickers hardness numbers (VHN), and the changes in SH after 2 min (ΔSH2-0) and the 4 min (ΔSH4-0) immersion. We analysed the differences between deciduous and permanent teeth using the Wilcoxon test and correlated ΔSH to the different chemical parameters.
RESULTS: Deciduous teeth were significantly softer (549.53 ± 59.41 VHN) than permanent teeth (590.15 ± 55.31 VHN; p < 0.001) at baseline, but they were not more vulnerable to erosive demineralization. Only orange juice, which presented milder erosive potential, caused significantly more demineralisation in deciduous teeth at ΔSH4-0. Practically all chemical parameters significantly correlated with ΔSH (p < 0.05). Substances with lower pH, higher titratable acidity, lower Ca, higher Pi and lower F concentrations, higher viscosity and more undersaturated solutions presented more erosive demineralisation.
CONCLUSION: Different parameters in dietary substances affect erosive demineralisation in deciduous and permanent teeth, but we generally observed no differences in susceptibility to erosion between both types of teeth; only orange juice (less severe acid conditions) caused perceptible differences. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We observe that permanent teeth are harder than deciduous teeth, but most substances cause no perceptible difference in erosive demineralisation in both types of teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical properties; Dental erosion; Dietary factors; Liability; Permanent teeth; Primary teeth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27449386     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1915-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  49 in total

1.  A comparison of the erosive potential of different beverages in primary and permanent teeth using an in vitro model.

Authors:  A Lussi; N Kohler; D Zero; M Schaffner; B Megert
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.612

Review 2.  The role of diet in the aetiology of dental erosion.

Authors:  A Lussi; T Jaeggi; D Zero
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Variation in the organic content of deciduous enamel and dentine.

Authors:  M V STACK
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1953-05       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Impact of modified acidic soft drinks on enamel erosion.

Authors:  T Attin; K Weiss; K Becker; W Buchalla; A Wiegand
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.511

5.  Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography.

Authors:  P R Wilson; A D Beynon
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  The solubility of fluorapatite and its relationship to that of calcium fluoride.

Authors:  H G McCann
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Relationship between human enamel structure and the formation of caries-like lesions in vitro.

Authors:  R P Shellis
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  The erosive potential of lollipops.

Authors:  H S Brand; D L Gambon; A Paap; M S Bulthuis; E C I Veerman; A V Nieuw Amerongen
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Understanding the chemistry of dental erosion.

Authors:  R Peter Shellis; John D B Featherstone; Adrian Lussi
Journal:  Monogr Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06-26

10.  Effects of buffering properties and undissociated acid concentration on dissolution of dental enamel in relation to pH and acid type.

Authors:  R P Shellis; M E Barbour; A Jesani; A Lussi
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  5 in total

1.  Are grape juices more erosive than orange juices?

Authors:  A P C A Beltrame; R A T Noschang; D P Lacerda; L C Souza; I C S Almeida
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 2.  The use of fluoride for the prevention of dental erosion and erosive tooth wear in children and adolescents.

Authors:  A Lussi; M A R Buzalaf; D Duangthip; V Anttonen; C Ganss; S H João-Souza; T Baumann; T S Carvalho
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Impact of honey on dental erosion and adhesion of early bacterial colonizers.

Authors:  Alexandra Habluetzel; Christoph Schmid; Thiago S Carvalho; Adrian Lussi; Sigrun Eick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Differences in susceptibility of deciduous and permanent teeth to erosion exist, albeit depending on protocol design and method of assessment.

Authors:  Thiago Saads Carvalho; Adrian Lussi; Nadine Schlueter; Tommy Baumann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effect of Popping Chocolate and Candy on Enamel Microhardness of Primary and Permanent Teeth.

Authors:  Mitra Tabari; Homayoon Alaghemand; Durdi Qujeq; Elahe Mohammadi
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-12-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.