Literature DB >> 27449016

Decontamination of electronic waste-polluted soil by ultrasound-assisted soil washing.

Fu Chen1,2,3, Baodan Yang4, Jing Ma5, Junfeng Qu5, Gangjun Liu6.   

Abstract

Laboratorial scale experiments were performed to evaluate the efficacy of a washing process using the combination of methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MCD) and tea saponin (TS) for simultaneous desorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs) and heavy metals from an electronic waste (e-waste) site. Ultrasonically aided mixing of the field contaminated soil with a combination of MCD and TS solutions simultaneously mobilizes most of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and the analyte metal (Pb, Cu, and Ni) burdens. It is found that 15 g/L MCD and 10 g/L TS is an efficient reagent combination reconciling extraction performance and reagent costs. Under these conditions, the removal efficiencies of HOCs and heavy metals are 93.5 and 91.2 %, respectively, after 2 cycles of 60-min ultrasound-assisted washing cycles. By contrast, 86.3 % of HOCs and 88.4 % of metals are removed from the soil in the absence of ultrasound after 3 cycles of 120-min washing. The ultrasound-assisted soil washing could generate high removal efficiency and decrease the operating time significantly. Finally, the feasibility of regenerating and reusing the spent washing solution in extracting pollutants from the soil is also demonstrated. By application of this integrated technology, it is possible to recycle the washing solution for a purpose to reduce the consumption of surfactant solutions. Collectively, it has provided an effective and economic treatment of e-waste-polluted soil.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Desorption; Soil washing; Tea saponin; Ultrasonication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27449016     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7271-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  17 in total

Review 1.  Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: a review.

Authors:  Xuhui Mao; Rui Jiang; Wei Xiao; Jiaguo Yu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and metal-contaminated soil by successive methyl-β-cyclodextrin-enhanced soil washing-microbial augmentation: a laboratory evaluation.

Authors:  Mingming Sun; Yongming Luo; Ying Teng; Zhongjun Jia; Zhengao Li; Shiping Deng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Remediation of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) contaminated site by successive methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MCD) and sunflower oil enhanced soil washing - Portulaca oleracea L. cultivation.

Authors:  Mao Ye; Mingming Sun; Feng Hu; Fredrick Orori Kengara; Xin Jiang; Yongming Luo; Xinlun Yang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Bioaccumulation of PCDD/Fs, PCBs and PBDEs by earthworms in field soils of an E-waste dismantling area in China.

Authors:  Hongtao Shang; Pu Wang; Thanh Wang; Yawei Wang; Haidong Zhang; Jianjie Fu; Daiwei Ren; Weihai Chen; Qinghua Zhang; Guibin Jiang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Cyclodextrins as complexation and extraction agents for pesticides from contaminated soil.

Authors:  Ryan J Flaherty; Bertil Nshime; Michael Delamarre; Sam Dejong; Pamela Scott; Andrew W Lantz
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Removal of Cu, Pb and Zn by foam fractionation and a soil washing process from contaminated industrial soils using soapberry-derived saponin: a comparative effectiveness assessment.

Authors:  Jyoti Prakash Maity; Yuh Ming Huang; Chun-Mei Hsu; Ching-I Wu; Chien-Cheng Chen; Chun-Yi Li; Jiin-Shuh Jean; Young-Fo Chang; Chen-Yen Chen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 7.  Extraction agents for the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil in soil washing technologies.

Authors:  Ee Von Lau; Suyin Gan; Hoon Kiat Ng; Phaik Eong Poh
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Evaluation of soil washing process with carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin and carboxymethyl chitosan for recovery of PAHs/heavy metals/fluorine from metallurgic plant site.

Authors:  Mao Ye; Mingming Sun; Fredrick Orori Kengara; Jingting Wang; Ni Ni; Li Wang; Yang Song; Xinglun Yang; Huixin Li; Feng Hu; Xin Jiang
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.565

Review 9.  Removal of hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil washing/flushing solutions: A critical review.

Authors:  Clément Trellu; Emmanuel Mousset; Yoan Pechaud; David Huguenot; Eric D van Hullebusch; Giovanni Esposito; Mehmet A Oturan
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  The study of operating variables in soil washing with EDTA.

Authors:  Zeli Zou; Rongliang Qiu; Weihua Zhang; Hanying Dong; Zhihao Zhao; Tao Zhang; Xiange Wei; Xinde Cai
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Pb Smelting on the Soil Bacterial Community near a Secondary Lead Plant.

Authors:  Zhanbin Luo; Jing Ma; Fu Chen; Xiaoxiao Li; Shaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Environmental Heavy Metal Contamination from Electronic Waste (E-Waste) Recycling Activities Worldwide: A Systematic Review from 2005 to 2017.

Authors:  M G Karel Houessionon; Edgard-Marius D Ouendo; Catherine Bouland; Sylvia A Takyi; Nonvignon Marius Kedote; Benjamin Fayomi; Julius N Fobil; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.