Literature DB >> 27448856

Farmers' attitude toward the introduction of selective dry cow therapy.

C G M Scherpenzeel1, S H W Tijs2, I E M den Uijl2, I M G A Santman-Berends2, A G J Velthuis2, T J G M Lam3.   

Abstract

The attitude of Dutch dairy farmers toward selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) is unknown, although a favorable mindset toward application of SDCT seems crucial for successful implementation. Given the fact that blanket dry cow treatment has been strongly promoted until recently, the implementation of SDCT was expected to be quite a challenge. This study aimed to provide insight into the level of implementation of SDCT in 2013 in the Netherlands, the methods used by farmers for selection of cows for dry cow treatment (DCT), the relation between SDCT and udder health and antimicrobial usage (AMU) in 2013, and the mindset of farmers toward SDCT. In 2014, a questionnaire was conducted in a group of 177 herds included in a large-scale udder health study in 2013 and for which all clinical mastitis cases during this year were recorded. In addition, data on somatic cell count (SCC) parameters and AMU was available for these herds. The questionnaire included questions with regard to DCT with a special emphasis on farmers' attitude and mindset with regard to applying DCT in 2013. The data that were obtained from the questionnaire were combined with the data on clinical mastitis, SCC, and AMU. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data and to study the association between DCT, udder health, and AMU. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with a logit link function were applied to evaluate potential associations between DCT and farmers' mindset. Selective DCT was taken up progressively by the farmers in our study, with 75% of them implementing SDCT in 2013. The main criterion used to select cows for DCT was the SCC history during the complete previous lactation. The herds were divided into 3 groups based on the percentage of cows dried off with antibiotics in 2013 as indicated by the farmers during interviews. The first group applied BDCT, and the herds for which SDCT was applied were split in 2 equally sized groups based on the median percentage of cows dried off with antibiotics (67%). The incidence rate of subclinical and clinical mastitis were comparable between the groups. Results of the multivariable model showed that 4 factors related to farmers' mindset were associated with the probability to apply SDCT: "financial consequences of SDCT," "uncertainty whether a cow will recover without antimicrobials," the statement "I do not have a problem with the (potential) negative consequences of SDCT," and the usage of internal teat sealants. Application of SDCT appeared to be associated with farmers' attitude. The mindset of farmers with respect to reduction of AMU and the implementation of SDCT was generally positive.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobials; attitude; selective dry cow therapy; udder health

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27448856     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

Review 1.  The RESET Mindset Model applied on decreasing antibiotic usage in dairy cattle in the Netherlands.

Authors:  T J G M Lam; J Jansen; R J Wessels
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.146

2.  Comparison of Defined Course Doses (DCDvet) for Blanket and Selective Antimicrobial Dry Cow Therapy on Conventional and Organic Farms.

Authors:  Clair L Firth; Annemarie Käsbohrer; Christa Egger-Danner; Klemens Fuchs; Beate Pinior; Franz-Ferdinand Roch; Walter Obritzhauser
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Mastitis Control and Intramammary Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ireland: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Simon J More; Catherine McAloon; Pablo Silva Boloña; Luke O'Grady; Frank O'Sullivan; Michelle McGrath; Willie Buckley; Kevin Downing; Patrick Kelly; Eoin G Ryan; Finola McCoy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Understanding Antibiotic Resistance as a Perceived Threat towards Dairy Cattle through Beliefs and Practices: A Survey-Based Study of Dairy Farmers.

Authors:  Eleni Casseri; Ece Bulut; Sebastian Llanos Soto; Michelle Wemette; Alison Stout; Amelia Greiner Safi; Robert Lynch; Paolo Moroni; Renata Ivanek
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Antibiotic dry buffalo therapy: effect of intramammary administration of benzathine cloxacillin against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy water buffalo.

Authors:  Jacopo Guccione; Luigi D'Andrea; Antonella Pesce; Fausto Toni; Giuliano Borriello; Caterina Salzano; Francesco Diuccio; Massimo Pascale; Paolo Ciaramella
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Understanding the effect of producers' attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control on intentions to use antimicrobials prudently on New York dairy farms.

Authors:  Amy K Vasquez; Carla Foditsch; Stéphie-Anne C Dulièpre; Julie D Siler; David R Just; Lorin D Warnick; Daryl V Nydam; Jaap Sok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  2018 Survey of antimicrobial drug use and stewardship practices in adult cows on California dairies: post-Senate Bill 27.

Authors:  Pius S Ekong; Essam M Abdelfattah; Emmanuel Okello; Deniece R Williams; Terry W Lehenbauer; Betsy M Karle; Joan D Rowe; Edith S Marshall; Sharif S Aly
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.